More powerful evidence that Trump’s cryptocurrency ventures are nothing more than a fig leaf for pay offs from foreign nationals & foreign gov'ts. I've opened an inquiry through PSI into Trump’s crypto-backed plan to auction off access to the White House.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Connecticut
Richard Blumenthal
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 830
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Richard Blumenthal
U.S. SenatorDemocratConnecticut
SoupScore
Richard's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 111 sponsored · 587 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
We must also remain committed to legislation that enacts safeguards & works to prevent senseless tragedies—legislation like Ethan's Law, that ensures firearms are safely stored so those in crisis can’t access them easily.
School-based mental health programs save lives. The Trump Administration must reverse these cuts now. At a time when students are facing a mental health crisis, we should be furthering ways to bolster mental health-not cutting funding for student support.
www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/u...
Proud to join veterans today to show Trump & his hacks that the VA is not for sale. Their approach to VA is slash & trash—putting it on the auction block & privatizing its services. Veterans deserve better & are making their voices heard.
At today’s hearing, VA Sec. Collins failed to answer my most basic questions. He can fill the words with air—but veterans deserve answers & accountability.
They’re among America’s most skilled & dedicated workers, making some of America’s most advanced aircraft engines & other aerospace defense products. They deserve Pratt’s respect—basic fairness.
Proud to join striking Pratt machinists in East Hartford—standing up for fair pay, pensions, job security & more.
Our nation's students are facing a mental health crisis. As the Trump Administration guts school-based mental health funding, we must come together & fight for mental health resources—giving it the same priority as physical health & ensuring students have the support they need.
Great Americans created our National Parks, a legacy that left our world a better place than they found it. Trump’s plan proves the adage “Any jackass can kick down a barn.”
VA Sec. Collins will face tough questions on Tuesday in a Veterans Affairs Committee hearing about mental health care failings, funding cuts, firings, grant cancellations & much more. He’s stonewalled & slow walked us for too long.
Sadly & shamefully, VA Sec. Collins is degrading & disintegrating mental health care—just when it’s most desperately needed. Abject disregard for privacy in caregiving is hurtful, heartlessly cruel, & simply stupid.
Time & again, Trump has shown that he is willing to sell out America for his own personal profit. $TRUMP represents his newest & most unprecedented, pay-to-play scheme—giving access to the highest bidder while hiding wealth in the blockchain.
The scope & scale of Trump’s brazen, craven crypto corruption is staggering. He has made it clear he is going to use the Presidency to make as much money as he can in office—conflicts of interest & national security threats be damned. That’s why an investigation is beyond necessary.
Our state’s prosperity & progress depends on proper, fair treatment of workers, especially at Pratt where their products are critical to our national defense.
I stand with Pratt Machinists in fighting for basic workplace fairness—decent, well deserved pay, pensions & job security. Workers need long term certainty in jobs & income to make the American dream real.
Trump’s contempt for basic Constitutional rights seems boundless—& deeply dangerous. A President who doubts his most fundamental duty—his sworn oath to the Constitution—is unfit for the office. Defiance of the law is becoming this Admin’s hallmark, with irreparable harm.
Squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on a Trump military Birthday Parade—Army organized, funded, staffed—seems a perfect target for Musk’s so-called waste police. His tech bro squad could try baking a cake instead—& use the savings to rehire federal workers, especially vets.
Army Plans for a Potential Parade on Trump's Birthday Call for 6,600 Soldiers, AP Learns www.military.com/daily-news/2...
Glorious, joyous University of Bridgeport graduation! Proud to join in, congratulating such accomplished, dedicated young people & their friends & loved ones in this wonderful celebration.
This Administration should celebrate the Army’s 250th Birthday by honoring past & present soldiers & reinstating thousands of vets fired from the federal workforce. Spend millions on rehiring heroes, not an extravagant military parade—on Trump’s birthday.
Even considering eliminating long-celebrated Veterans Day on Nov 11 & calling it “Victory Day” seems pretty insulting to veterans. But not surprising for a President who’s called them “suckers” & is dismantling the VA.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History830 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
830 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (5-94) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-53) |
| 2025-04-04 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H. Con. Res. 14 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 26 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-83) |
| 2025-04-03 | S.J. Res. 33 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (15-82) |
| 2025-04-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-04-03 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (53-42) |
| 2025-04-02 | H.J. Res. 24 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-04-02 | S.J. Res. 37 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-04-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-04-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-03-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-42) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-03-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-03-27 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (52-48) |
| 2025-03-26 | S.J. Res. 18 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | H.J. Res. 25 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-43) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-03-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-44) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-03-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (73-25) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (60-31) |
| 2025-03-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-30) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (63-32) |
| 2025-03-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (64-33) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (54-46) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (27-73) |
| 2025-03-14 | H.R. 1968 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.