Cory A. Booker headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Jersey
Born
April 27, 1969
Age 57
Phone
(202) 224-3224
Office
306 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey

Cory A. Booker

Cory Anthony Booker is an American politician and lawyer serving as the senior United States senator from New Jersey, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Booker is the first African-American U.S. senator from New Jersey. He was the 38th mayor of Newark from 2006 to 2013, and served on the Municipal Council of Newark for the Central Ward from 1998 to 2002.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 774
Yes26%
No69%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cory A. Booker headshot
Cory A. Booker
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Cory A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 99 sponsored · 460 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Leader Jeffries took to the floor to remind all Americans of the devastating impacts of the Republican party’s morally bankrupt bill. It is an honor to fight alongside him, from the Capitol steps to the House and Senate floor.
Honored to host a town hall for Veterans today. Many of the patriots I spoke to today were deeply concerned about cuts to Medicaid and the VA — standing up for them in the Senate against the attacks on their health care is one of the most important parts of my work.
New Jerseyans are now facing unprecedented cuts to Medicaid and their health care. Grateful to visit Valley Hospital today to discuss the challenges hospitals and our friends and neighbors are facing in the wake of Senate Republicans’ harmful bill.
We fought hard against Trump’s terrible bill in the Senate…and three of our Republicans colleagues voted with us — but too many still feared Trump’s retribution to vote their conscience.
This investment will strengthen our economy, improve safety, and support the workers who are not just building our bridges, but building the American middle class. When we invest in infrastructure, we invest in our future.
By securing significant federal funding for this $2.2 billion project, including $495 million from Amtrak and roughly 50 percent of the remaining $1.73 billion from key federal transit programs.
Our railways are like vital arteries, carrying people, goods, and opportunity across America, but after years of neglect, they’ve become clogged by outdated and crumbling infrastructure. That’s why I’m proud to stand with our New Jersey Workers building our bridges.
At long last we are making progress on one of our nation’s largest infrastructure projects. The new Portal North Bridge will allow NJ TRANSIT and Amtrak to reliably serve New Jerseyans for years to come.
The people of New Jersey deserve a US Attorney who will work to keep our communities safe and impartially pursue justice. It’s clear that Alina Habba does not meet the standard to serve the people of New Jersey.
The passage of this bill, that does so much damage–just to give tax breaks to the ultra-wealthy–is a clear call for change in Washington. I will continue to stand up and fight for working Americans across the country.
This bill has been on the Senate floor for days and Republicans still can’t unite to kick people off of their health care and raise costs for Americans. We can fight this bill.
It appears that this bill might be too big and not beautiful enough for some of my Republican colleagues. If we stand together, we can fight back against these cuts to Medicaid, increased energy costs, and skyrocketing deficits.
Senate Democrats are standing up right now for our constituents who will lose their health care, who will face rising energy costs, and who will lose access to SNAP benefits. We have to do whatever we can to stop the “Big Beautiful Bill”.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
774 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYESMotion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYESMotion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18Begin considerationNOT_VOTINGNOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →