Tulsi Gabbard's dangerous attempt to sow fear, pit people against each other, and smear the Muslim Americans of Paterson, NJ is dishonest, cruel, and un-American – it endangers an entire community. In Jersey, we know our state's diversity is our strength and we stand up for our own.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Cory A. Booker
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes26%
No69%
Present1%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party3%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cory A. Booker
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Cory A.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 99 sponsored · 458 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Paterson is one of New Jersey’s oldest cities and has always embodied the best American values - industry, perseverance, and diversity.
This still stands. The American people deserve the truth about the crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein.
Judge Esther Salas stands for justice & speaks truth to power. Threats against judges undermine judicial independence and the rule of law. This Administration’s dangerous rhetoric and partisan attacks on judges who have ruled against its unlawful actions are breeding hostility and must be condemned.
In one year Trump has vastly expanded his personal wealth, while jobs for Americans are harder than ever to find.
This jobs report proves what Americans are feeling: Trump’s chaos is stagnating growth and limiting opportunity, all while prices keep climbing up.
As unemployment climbs the Republican-controlled Congress has done nothing to deliver solutions for American families.
Hanukkah reminds us of the power of our light, especially amidst the darkness and when facing adversity. Happy Hanukkah to those celebrating in New Jersey and around the world.
I’m horrified by the terror attack in Australia targeting a celebration of Hanukkah. We all must stand against this hatred. No one should be targeted for their religion.
It’s heartbreaking that, 13 years after Sandy Hook, we’ve done far too little to stop these reoccuring tragedies. The American people want common sense gun safety measures. If you need a license to drive a car or open a business, you should need one to operate a weapon of war.
Thirteen years ago, 20 children and 6 educators were murdered at Sandy Hook—an attack that stole futures and shook our nation to its core. We owe their families more than remembrance, we owe them action. Today, I recommit to doing everything in my power to stop this from ever happening again.
Last night at Brown, students were studying for their last exams, excited to return home to reunite with their family and friends, their lives were forever altered by gun violence. We must do better for each other and not allow our futures to be dictated by the gun industry.
Achieving genuine peace requires more than the ceremonialism of signing documents and empty declarations of success by President Trump; It requires implementation and inclusive processes to address root causes of conflict.
I call on DRC, Rwanda, and M23 to end the violence.
This is wrong, and we must continue to stand and fight to lower costs and increase access to health care for Americans.
Today, Democrats voted vote to lower health care costs for Americans, instead of joining with us, Senate Republicans voted against stopping premium increases for more than 20 million Americans.
This year Trump and the GOP have launched an all-out assault on Americans health care–cutting medicaid, kicking 17 million off health insurance, and eliminating funding for life-saving research.
Congressional Republicans have no plan to deal with the twin health care tsunamis they created. Today they can vote for our plan to protect Americans’ health care and give us the time we need to make the system stronger.
Today the Senate will vote whether to lower health insurance costs for Americans, or let them double for millions. I urge my Republican colleagues to join us and address this crisis.
Too many Americans are already one lost job or one twist of fate away from losing their health care. Now Republicans are letting costs skyrocket for over 20 million Americans, we have to stop this crisis.
There’s a clear pattern: Trump is turning the pardon power, which is meant for mercy, into rewards for the wealthy and well-connected, eroding trust in both the law and the presidency.
Quid pro quo pardons are plain corruption.
Imaad Zuberi was serving 12 years for violating lobbying, campaign finance, and tax laws, and obstructing an investigation into Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee. Zuberi had donated $1.1M post-2016 election and posted photos with Trump and his top aides. Trump pardoned him.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.