Nanette Diaz Barragán headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 44
Born
September 15, 1976
Age 49
Phone
(202) 225-8220
Office
2312 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 44

Nanette Diaz Barragán

Nanette Díaz Barragán is an American politician and attorney serving as the U.S. representative for California's 44th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she previously served as an Hermosa Beach city councilmember from 2013 to 2015.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 499
Yes39%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 44

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Nanette Diaz Barragán headshot
Nanette Diaz Barragán
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 44
SoupScore
Nanette Diaz's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 26 sponsored · 230 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Who deserves health care? EVERYONE! I joined @asmmarkgonzalez.bsky.social, Supervisor Holly Mitchell, St. John’s Community Health CEO Jim Mangia, union members, health care advocates, and local leaders at a rally with St. John’s Community Health to defend Americans’ health care.
I joined the @demwomencaucus.bsky.social to visit Sydney Kraemer Upcountry Regional Center that provides essential health care — but its services are at risk thanks to Trump and Republicans’ attacks on Americans’ health care that will raise costs.
Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the White House — they own this shutdown. @housedemocrats.bsky.social have been ready to and find a bipartisan solution to reopen the government and protect YOUR health care — House Republicans packed up, went home, and shutdown the government.
I joined @debbiedingell.house.gov and advocates from @littlelobbyists.com to hear how health care cuts would harm children with disabilities and their families. @housedemocrats.bsky.social want to protect access to health care for ALL AMERICANS.
Kaiser Family Foundation estimates now show health care premiums will MORE THAN DOUBLE if Republicans fail to extend health care tax credits that help Americans afford to see the doctor or get medicine they need.
Our new analysis shows that the average increase in out-of-pocket premium payments from the expiration of the ACA enhanced premium tax credits is *even higher* than previously estimated. Learn why: https://on.kff.org/3WfWxjj
KFF bar chart titled “Premium payments in 2026 would more than double on average if ACA Enhanced Premium Tax Credits Expire.” The chart shows the annual out-of-pocket premium payments for Affordable Care Act Marketplace enrollees in 2025 and 2026. For 2025, the payment is $888, and for 2026, the projected payment is $1,904. This is an increase of 114%. Note: the 2026 average premium payment assumes gross premiums increase of 18% for those who lose tax credit eligibility.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
499 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-11-20H.R. 5107 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-20H.R. 5214 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H. Res. 888 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2025-11-19S.J. Res. 80 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 131 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-19H.J. Res. 130 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 888 (119th)Motion to ReferYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 879 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-11-18H.R. 4405 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-18H. Res. 878 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-11-18H.R. 2659 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-17H.R. 1608 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-11-13H.R. 5371 (119th)Accept Senate changesNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-11-12H. Res. 873 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-19H. Res. 719 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-19H.R. 5371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-18H.R. 1047 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3015 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-18H.R. 3062 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 713 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5143 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H.R. 5125 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-17H. Res. 722 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 5140 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 4922 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-16H.R. 2721 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-09-16H. Res. 707 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-09-15H.R. 3400 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-09-15H.J. Res. 117 (119th)Kill the motionNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3486 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-11H.R. 3944 (119th)Instruct negotiatorsYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-09-10H.R. 3838 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 10Next →