At a Glance

Seat

U.S. Senator from Delaware

Born

February 10, 1962

Age 64

Phone

(202) 224-2441

Office

513 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515

Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware

Lisa Blunt Rochester

Lisa LaTrelle Blunt Rochester is an American politician serving since 2025 as the junior United States senator from Delaware. From 2017 to 2025, she served as the U.S. representative for Delaware's at-large congressional district. A member of the Democratic Party, she is the first woman and first African American to represent Delaware in both chambers of Congress.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)

SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown

Loading…

Voting Record — 772

Yes27%

No73%

Present0%

Not Voting0%

Party align98%

Cross-party1%

SoupScore

District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.

Social & Web

Official site Bluesky X @SenLBR Facebook Instagram

External Resources

Wikipedia Ballotpedia VoteSmart GovTrack OpenSecrets

Lisa Blunt Rochester

U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware

SoupScore

Lisa's ATmosphere Activity

20 recent posts · 30 sponsored · 177 cosponsored

View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 22(source)

Exactly right. This is an incredible threat to our nation, and @merkley.senate.gov has been holding the Senate floor for hours to call it out. Tune in ⬇️ www.youtube.com/live/ymDt1Xe...

Senator Jeff Merkley

@merkley.senate.gov

Open post ↗

THIS IS NOT NORMAL. I'm holding the floor to protest Trump dragging us further into authoritarianism. www.youtube.com/shorts/Lm26u...

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 21(source)

This weekend, I joined Rev. Al Sharpton on Politics Nation with a simple message: the President and Speaker Johnson need to call House Republicans back to work. We can’t negotiate with people who aren’t even in the CITY, much less the Capitol.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 21(source)

First, Republicans gutted health care access for millions of Americans. Then, they shut down the government for 21 days— with no end in sight. Now, they’re throwing themselves a party to celebrate. Up next: YOUR premiums go up because of their inaction.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 21(source)

Trump promised to lower costs and help working class Americans. Now, costs are higher than ever, and no one can find a new job. His economic leadership has been nothing short of a disaster.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 20(source)

Reflecting on this weekend’s No Kings rallies, I’m filled with energy and resolve. This is not just a one time deal—we’re going to have to stay strong and keep this energy going. Together, we can defend our democracy.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 20(source)

We have the chance to help people who are struggling the most have it better tomorrow than they do today. That’s what we're fighting for. This administration sows division to distract from the fact that they’re selling all of us - regardless of party - out to the highest bidder.

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govOct 17(source)

Republicans own this shutdown.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 17(source)

We want to reopen the government, but we’re unwilling to support a status quo that sells out millions of our constituents to make our nation poorer and sicker. They want our votes? Come to the table and help us fix this.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 17(source)

But Republicans are saying health care for millions of Americans is too expensive. Make it make sense.

More Perfect Union

@moreperfectunion.bsky.social

Open post ↗

BREAKING: The Trump administration is doubling its Argentina bailout to $40 billion.

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialOct 16(source)

I do not want your premiums to double next year. Republicans do.

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse@whitehouse.senate.govOct 16(source)

If you thought your electric bill jumped a lot in this Trump administration, it’s because it did! What you didn’t know is that they are jacking your electricity prices on purpose to reward big donors with big bucks.

Bar graph showing year-over-year increase in electricity rates during presidential terms.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 16(source)

This administration wants to shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. That’s the agency tasked with protecting consumers, like you, from fraud, price gouging, and corporate abuse. If you were wondering whose side they were on, here’s your answer.

Link

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 16(source)

Let Me Be Blunt: your premiums are about to DOUBLE. We still have a chance to set things right, but we’re on the clock. Republicans have TWO WEEKS left to come to the table and help us fix this. There’s no time to waste.

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Congresswoman Sarah McBride@mcbride.house.govOct 16(source)

Let’s be clear: Republicans control the White House, Senate, and House. This shutdown is on them. Democrats are ready to end this—and protect your health care.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 15(source)

A look at this Republican government shutdown, by the numbers:

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Senator Tammy Baldwin@baldwin.senate.govOct 15(source)

Republicans don’t have a strategy to reopen the government, and it shows. On Day #15 of Donald Trump’s shutdown, I am STILL waiting for Republicans to get their act together and help us lower Americans' health care costs.

Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester

Senator Jeff Merkley@merkley.senate.govOct 15(source)

Republicans control the House, Senate, and White House. They shut down the government to slash YOUR health care.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 15(source)

This is what we’ve been saying: shutdown or not, this administration has been withholding funds, cancelling grants to things like cancer research, and carelessly firing dedicated federal workers. They’ve given us no reason to trust their word—it’s time Congress took a stand.

Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester@bluntrochester.senate.govOct 14(source)

It's been two weeks since Republicans shut down the government. Reminder: they could come to the table and negotiate to reopen things today and restore people's health care coverage. They're actively choosing not to.

← Newer postsPosts page 12Older posts →

Sponsored Bills(30)

S. 4262 (119th)
A bill to promote shared equity models of homeownership, and for other purposes.
S.J. Res. 133 (119th)
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, Unite…
S. 4102 (119th)
A bill to amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to reauthorize Dela…
S. 4080 (119th)
A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide bonus depreciation for long-ter…
S. Res. 618 (119th)
A resolution recognizing the importance of career and technical education ("CTE") educators …

Cosponsored Bills(177)

S. Res. 710 (119th)
A resolution recognizing Maternal Mental Health Day to raise awareness about maternal mental…
Joined: 2026-04-30
S. Res. 706 (119th)
A resolution expressing support for the designation of April 2026 as "National Child Abuse P…
Joined: 2026-04-29
S. Res. 694 (119th)
A resolution designating April 2026 as "Financial Literacy Month".
Joined: 2026-04-28
S. 4395 (119th)
A bill to reauthorize the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002, and for other purposes.
Joined: 2026-04-27
S. Res. 688 (119th)
A resolution expressing support for the staff of public, school, academic, and special libra…
Joined: 2026-04-27

Leadership

No leadership roles

Committees

SoupScore Breakdown

Loading analysis metrics…

Voting History

772 total votes

ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

Date	Bill	Question	Position	Party Maj	Align?	Result
2025-09-17	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Rejected (51-48, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-16	S. Con. Res. 22 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (36-62)
2025-09-16	S.J. Res. 60 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2025-09-15	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (48-47)
2025-09-15	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2025-09-15	S. Res. 377 (119th)	Resolution S.Res. 377	NO	NO	✓	Resolution Agreed to (51-44)
2025-09-11	S. Res. 377 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-09-11	S. Res. 377 (119th)	Decision of the Chair S.Res. 377	YES	YES	✓	Decision of Chair Not Sustained (45-53)
2025-09-11	S. Res. 377 (119th)	Motion to Reconsider S.Res. 377	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Reconsider Agreed to (52-45)
2025-09-11	S. Res. 377 (119th)	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-09-10	S. 2296 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Table Agreed to (51-49)
2025-09-09	S. Res. 377 (119th)	Begin consideration	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-09	S. Res. 377 (119th)	Kill the motion	NO	NO	✓	Motion to Table Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-09	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-09-09	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-09-09	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (49-46)
2025-09-09	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-09-09	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-09-08	—	Confirm nominee	NOT_VOTING	NO	—	Nomination Confirmed (50-43)
2025-09-04	S. 2296 (119th)	Begin consideration	YES	YES	✓	Motion to Proceed Agreed to (83-13)
2025-09-04	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-09-04	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-09-02	S. 2296 (119th)	End filibuster to begin debate	YES	YES	✓	Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-14, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (71-23)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	—	—	Nomination Confirmed (72-22)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (59-35)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-42)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	YES	✕	Nomination Confirmed (78-17)
2025-08-02	—	End debate	NO	YES	✕	Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-19)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-45)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (49-44)
2025-08-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-08-02	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-08-02	—	End debate	NO	NO	✓	Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-41)
2025-08-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (50-45)
2025-08-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-08-01	—	Confirm nominee	NO	NO	✓	Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Agreed to (81-15)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Final passage	YES	YES	✓	Bill Passed (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Agreed to (87-9, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	NO	NO	✓	Amendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01	H.R. 3944 (119th)	Vote on amendment	YES	YES	✓	Amendment Rejected (44-51)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 6 / 16Next →