Lisa Blunt Rochester headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Delaware
Born
February 10, 1962
Age 64
Phone
(202) 224-2441
Office
513 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware

Lisa Blunt Rochester

Voting Record — 890
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Lisa Blunt Rochester headshot
Lisa Blunt Rochester
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Lisa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 209 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Nooses are symbols of hate. Swastikas – the literal symbol of the Nazi Party, the perpetrators of the Holocaust – are symbols of hate. This isn’t controversial.⁣ ⁣ This isn’t how you recruit upstanding Americans into our armed forces.
Exclusive: The U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify the swastika, nooses and the Confederate flag as hate symbols. The military service drafted a new policy that classifies them as “potentially divisive.”
Glad to meet with the Sussex Economic Development Action Committee this morning for a conversation about our shared vision for an economy that works for all of Sussex County. I look forward to working with the partners in this room for years to come
The Department of Education’s job was never day-to-day management of classrooms, it was to protect our kids from discrimination and give every student the chance to thrive. Don’t be fooled. The impacts of their negligence will be measured in years, not weeks or months.
The White House may have a new gilded ballroom and a new marble bathroom, but hardworking Americans are struggling to afford housing. It's time for the federal government to get off the sidelines when it comes to solving our housing crisis.
I didn’t vote for this deal. But where do we go from here? I know there are House members from both parties who want to keep our health care crisis from getting worse. It’s on Speaker Johnson to hold a vote, restore these tax credits, and bring down costs.
A 50-year mortgage just shows how shortsighted this administration is. For a slightly lower monthly payment, you end up paying WAY more interest in the long term. We need to pass real solutions to bring down housing costs- not just move costs around to benefit big banks.
Header: President Trump's 50-Year-Mortgage Explained
Screenshot: Tweet from @pulte "Thanks to President Trump, we are indeed working on The 50 year Mortgage - a complete game changer.
Screenshot: Truth Social post from @realdonaldtrump "Great American Presidents: 30-year Mortgage - President Roosevelt; 50-year mortgage, President Trump.

On a black background overlayed atop a subtle suburban house.
Header: Home price: $400,000

30 Year Mortgage
Down payment: $40,000 (10%)
Interest Rate: 6%
Monthly Payment: $2,158
Payments: 360
Total Paid to Bank: $777,017

On a black background overlayed atop a subtle suburban house. Photo of Donald Trump in the bottom righthand corner
Header: Home price: $400,000

50 Year Mortgage
Down payment: $40,000 (10%)
Interest rate: (6%)
Monthly Payment: $1,895
Payments: 600
Total Paid to Bank: $1,137,034

On a black background overlayed atop a subtle suburban house. Photo of Donald Trump in the bottom lefthand corner
50 year mortgages mean YOU pay more - 'YOU' is circled in red. 


A white logo for Senator LBR features centered along the bottom edge.
The president is willing to try everything - including unproven strategies that undercut Americans’ bargaining power - to avoid extending tax credits that we KNOW will bring premiums down. It’s time for Republicans to get serious about addressing this health care crisis.
It’s unconscionable how hard this administration would fight the court to deny people access to nutritious foods.   But as they leave Americans behind, many of our states are stepping up to fill the gap.   That’s why I introduced the SNAP Back Act— to repay states that do the right thing.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Kill the motionNONOMotion to Table Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2025-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (55-44)
2025-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-45)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 18 / 18