For parents trying to keep their kids healthy and safe, accurate and consistent information is vital.
We need to continue doing all we can to ensure access to vaccines.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware
Lisa Blunt Rochester
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 830
Yes28%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Lisa Blunt Rochester
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Lisa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 33 sponsored · 191 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
As we continue to process this dark and disturbing week, there can be no doubt: we need to come together, focused on keeping guns away from people who seek to carry out these senseless acts.
The safety of our communities demands that we stay in the fight to end gun violence.
Delaware is the lowest state in the nation and pollution in our air has caused serious harm to our communities' health.
This administration turning a blind eye to polluters won't stop rising sea levels or make our air safer to breathe.
It'll only make these problems harder to fix.
We have a housing crisis in this country, and we need A New Way Home.
Here’s a look at my 5-pillar plan to leverage new and existing policy tools to make sure everyone in our communities has a safe, affordable place to call home.
For the full report:
www.bluntrochester.senate.gov/wp-content/u...
Let Me Be Blunt: RFK Jr should resign.
This ain’t political, it’s public health.
Our kids can’t learn if they’re home sick.
Take it from the president of the DE School Nurse Association: clear, science-based leadership is what keeps our kids in classrooms and our communities healthy.
Dangerous diseases don’t respect state boundaries.
If, God forbid, Florida has another outbreak - of COVID, measles, or even polio - how are neighboring states supposed to protect their communities?
Thanks to RFK Jr, states are left to their own devices and the health of students depends on their ZIP code.
It's unacceptable— our kids and our communities deserve better.
When the president nominated RFK Jr to be the Secretary of Health and Human Services, @democrats.senate.gov sounded the alarm. We were ignored.
This week, I brought parents, doctors, and legislators together to shine a light on just how harmful his leadership has been.
Today, we take a moment to remember all those who lost their lives in the devastating 9/11 attacks and honor the first responders who stepped up to serve our communities.
We will never forget.
From Utah Valley University to Evergreen High School in Denver, we have seen tragic shootings at multiple schools, minutes apart.
It's reprehensible. We owe our kids a future free from the fear of gun violence.
JUST IN: Three people are in critical condition after a shooting at Evergreen High School in Evergreen, Colorado, according to St. Anthony’s Hospital. https://cnn.it/46fImzg
Communities across the country are facing a housing affordability crisis— we need to take action.
That's why last week, I released the blueprint for A New Way Home – to help people everywhere find safe, affordable places to call home.
Let's get to work.
Happy birthday to our senior Senator @coons.senate.gov!
Thank you for your friendship, your partnership, and your service to the first state. Wishing you a blessed year ahead!
Nothing about kicking millions off their health insurance, supercharging vaccine skepticism, or letting care costs skyrocket is ‘making America healthy again’.
This administration has been a disaster for our nation’s health, and RFK Jr has been at the head.
He needs to resign.
We should demand that the people leading our nation’s energy policy have a basic understanding of how the technology they regulate works.
This is embarrassing.
We shouldn’t accept that this administration can profile people who look a certain way, talk a certain way, or work a certain job as criminals. That presumption of guilt is fundamentally un-American.
We can't stand idly by in the face of this blatant attack on our civil rights.
Proud to attend the 47th Annual Nanticoke Indian Powwow today.
For decades, this event has celebrated the culture, people, and spirit of the Nanticoke. Thank you to this wonderful community for hosting me!
Let Me Be Blunt: I have big news.
We need to be tackling the housing crisis head-on, and today I release a sweeping agenda to do just that. Together, we’ll chart a path to a new way home.
When BLS reported how bad this administration’s economy is, trump fired the commissioner.
Now, as another weak jobs report looms, there are “technical difficulties” with the BLS site that publishes job data.
This admin can’t hide from their record, no matter how hard they try.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History830 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
830 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17