What a fitting way to celebrate St. Patrick's Day!
Great to see you, Mr. President ☘️
Happy St. Patrick's Day, Delaware!
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Delaware
Lisa Blunt Rochester
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 834
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Lisa Blunt Rochester
U.S. SenatorDemocratDelaware
SoupScore
Lisa's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 33 sponsored · 192 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Delaware, I won't vote to give away your voice.
I'm voting NO on this Republican funding bill.
This is a welcome decision, and I'll be glad to see our federal workers back doing the work to keep our communities safe and healthy, but we can't forget the damage that has been done in their absence.
Cutting a vital resource that millions rely on isn't efficiency.
It's about keeping our seniors in the dark as they make it harder to access benefits - or cut them entirely - so they can pay for their billionaire tax cut. This is a robbery - we need to call it out.
Grateful for the opportunity to kick off the BWR Women of Power Summit's visit to Capitol Hill.
They're here to speak truth to power and remind everyone that we'll never back down from the fight for what's right.
This morning, workers at the @usedgov.bsky.social were told to stay home. It's the first step in their plan to dismantle the department entirely.
Instead of lowering your costs, they’re focused on taking money away from schools, kids from low-income households, and kids with disabilities.
The Agriculture Secretary just called this now-canceled USDA program that helped feed kids AND support our farmers "non-essential."
You read that right - the Trump administration thinks both our children and our farmers are "non-essential."
When Trump starts reckless trade wars with our allies, they push back.
Now, more than a million families will see their energy costs go higher than ever.
His promise to cut your energy costs in half was a hollow one. Actions have consequences.
Workers all across this country have made a deal: contribute to Social Security so that when you retire, you can do so with dignity.
The richest man in the world just proposed breaking that deal - and stealing your money - like it was nothing.
OUTRAGEOUS.
...to talk about our shared work to expand and improve care for women of all ages, and to thank them all for being here to speak truth to power in the face of growing attacks on women's health.
(2/2)
There's no better advocate for women's health than physicians who can speak firsthand to the challenges they face everyday.
I was excited to join @acog-org.bsky.social this afternoon...
(1/2)
Cuts to life-saving health research would have a big impact on Delawareans.
That’s why I'm grateful to AG Jennings and all the attorneys general who've successfully sued to stop Trump's cuts to vital NIH research, including $13M+ for Delaware.
baytobaynews.com/stories/heal...
Reposted bySenator Lisa Blunt Rochester
Speaker Johnson has rolled out a slush fund continuing resolution that would give Donald Trump and Elon Musk more power over federal spending—and more power to pick winners and losers, which threatens families in blue and red states alike.
Read my full statement ⬇️
There’s never been a plan.
Planes are falling out of the sky and this admin wants to fire the people in charge of helping them land safely.
All to justify giving their billionaire friends’ companies lucrative government contracts.
They’re looking out for themselves, not you.
On the 60th anniversary of Bloody Sunday, we remember the courage of all those who remained undeterred by bigotry and violence as marched for voting rights.
As those fundamental rights that their bravery secured come under threat yet again, I’ll never back down. We’re not going back.
$2,000 may mean nothing to Trump and his billionaire friends, but for families across Delaware this would be a disaster.
But that's the point: they don't care about families living paycheck to paycheck so long as they keep getting richer.
I'll be on @cnn.com around 8:00 to talk about the Trump Tariffs and the plot to dismantle @usedgov.bsky.social.
Tune in!
USPS is one of the most popular government services we have.
Privatizing the Postal Service in the name of profit would hurt seniors, small businesses & countless others.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History834 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
834 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17