ICE belongs in accountability hearings, not on a taxpayer-funded international field trip.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Vermont at-large
Becca Balint
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 615
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
At-Large District
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Becca Balint
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratVermont at-large
SoupScore
Becca's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 137 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Removing Greg Bovino from Minneapolis is a step in the right direction – but it’s a cosmetic fix. We need real reform, and those responsible must face justice in court.
FYI — LOCATION CHANGE:
Vermonters, I'm holding a town hall in Montpelier TODAY at ALUMNI HALL. Join us at 5:30PM in person or catch the livestream to talk about what's going on with ICE, healthcare and more.
Space is limited - RSVP at the link in bio!
I want to remind the President: God sees all.
Republicans never miss a chance to cite the Second Amendment - until the facts contradict the administration’s cover up. Then they disappear.
We need Republicans in Congress to put country before party and stand up with us now.
We will need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission when these cruel, lawless people are out of office. They must be held accountable in order for our nation to heal.
I am so full of rage, disgust and heartache. This man was executed at point blank range. The evidence in the videos is much stronger than their fascist lies. What will it take for Americans to admit our own government will kill us and lie about it?
ICE out of Minnesota NOW.
Heartbreak doesn’t convey the devastation of what happened to Alex Jeffrey Pretti today. His own government killed him in cold blood.
The Senate cannot pass the DHS funding bill to allow these disgusting actions to continue.
Bring Jack Smith back. He has more information to share and the American people deserve a full and honest accounting of the truth.
We’re demanding answers from Meta about their gross multi-million-dollar ad partnership with ICE to recruit more officers using white nationalist propaganda.
If you're cashing checks from hate, you're part of the problem.
Make that 186.
Trump is using the same old playbook on Jack Smith that he used on January 6th: target, inflame, and then deny responsibility. But we see through it and we will not let him renegotiate reality.
Today, Jack Smith laid out his airtight investigation into Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election. He was clear: the facts are the facts. The law is the law. He will not be intimidated - and we will not accept anything short of the truth for Americans.
The anniversary of Roe v. Wade is a reminder that Trump and Republicans have stripped women of having control over their own bodies.
When Democrats regain control in Congress, autonomy and justice must be restored to women.
Happening: Special Counsel Jack Smith is testifying before the House Judiciary Committee. Mr. Smith investigated Trump using facts and law. Every American should know what he found.
The arc of the moral universe doesn’t bend on its own. On MLK Day, amid renewed fights for justice and accountability in America, we honor Dr. King by showing up, speaking out, and doing the work.
This is sick. This is cruel. This is what abuse of power looks like. But Americans are seeing this evil conduct, they are rejecting it, and the truth will out.
There has been so much misinformation about what we as Americans can do - so I got us a refresher. I encourage everyone to continue courageously exercising your First Amendment rights.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History615 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
615 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.