H.R. 2056 (119th)Bill Overview

District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act of 2025

Immigration|District of ColumbiaFederal preemption
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 11, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The bill prohibits the District of Columbia from maintaining any statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that bars or limits District officials or entities from sharing information about an individual’s citizenship or immigration status with federal, state, or local governments, and requires compliance with Department of Homeland Security requests under INA sections 236 and 287 to honor detainers or provide notice of releases.

Passage35/100

House approval raises baseline chances, but high controversy, federalism objections, and Senate procedural dynamics lower overall probability.

CredibilityPartial

How solid the drafting looks.

Contention75/100

Local control and community trust vs. federal law and public safety

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · Immigrants
Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesEnables more direct cooperation between District and federal immigration authorities.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay increase enforcement actions against noncitizens alleged to violate immigration laws.
  • Federal agenciesPromotes uniform application of federal immigration law within the District.
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsReduces District authority to set local law enforcement and privacy policies.
  • ImmigrantsLikely to undermine immigrant trust, potentially decreasing crime reporting and cooperation.
  • FamiliesMay increase deportations and resultant family separations among District residents.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Local control and community trust vs. federal law and public safety
Progressive15%

Likely to oppose the bill as an overreach that undermines local self-governance and community trust.

Concerns would focus on civil‑rights, public‑safety tradeoffs, and impacts on immigrant willingness to contact police or access services.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Mixed but cautiously receptive: supports rule‑of‑law coordination while wanting procedural safeguards and fiscal clarity.

Sees practical value in cooperation but worries about legal liability, costs, and community trust effects.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Likely strongly supportive, viewing the bill as restoring compliance with federal law and preventing sanctuary policies.

Emphasizes public safety and federal supremacy over local sanctuary decisions.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

House approval raises baseline chances, but high controversy, federalism objections, and Senate procedural dynamics lower overall probability.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Senate floor scheduling and cloture dynamics
  • Potential legal challenges to enforcement or civil liberties
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Local control and community trust vs. federal law and public safety

House approval raises baseline chances, but high controversy, federalism objections, and Senate procedural dynamics lower overall probabili…

Unlocked analysis

Pro readers get the full perspective split, passage barriers, legislative design review, stakeholder impact map, and lens-based policy tradeoff analysis for District of Columbia Federal Immigration Compliance Act of 202…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis