Maria Cantwell headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Washington
Born
October 13, 1958
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-3441
Office
511 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Washington

Maria Cantwell

Maria Ellen Cantwell is an American politician serving as the junior U.S. senator from Washington since 2001. A member of the Democratic Party, she previously served in the Washington House of Representatives from 1987 to 1993 and in the United States House of Representatives from 1993 to 1995.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 772
Yes29%
No71%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Maria Cantwell headshot
Maria Cantwell
U.S. SenatorDemocratWashington
SoupScore
Maria's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 23 sponsored · 148 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This Administration illegally collected hundreds of billions of dollars from American businesses. I’m requesting detailed information about how the Administration plans to reimburse the payors of those tariffs. My letter to Sec. Bessent ⬇️
Dear Secretary Bessent:

In light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision today that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing certain tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) must prioritize prompt reimbursement to those businesses that have paid the substantial tariffs.

Given this Administration has illegally collected hundreds of billions of dollars from American businesses, that now must be refunded, I am requesting detailed information about how the Administration plans to fairly and expeditiously reimburse the payors of those tariffs.

The Administration should have been preparing for months for the potential that the Supreme Court would likely agree with the position taken by lower courts – including the Court of International Trade, district courts, and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – that the president exceeded his legal authority under IEEPA.[1] Many American businesses, especially small and medium-sized businesses, have struggled to pay these illegal tariffs and, for some, the financial strain has placed them on the brink of bankruptcy. Thus, it is essential Treasury implement an expeditious and transparent process to remediate the financial harm that resulted from these illegal tariffs.

As I understand it, when a good enters a U.S. port of entry, merchandise is classified and tariffs are assessed using the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Importers self-classify and declare the value or quantity of their goods and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reviews the paperwork, collects any applicable tariffs, and deposits any revenue from tariffs or other penalties into the General Fund of the United States.
The Monthly Treasury Statement provides only an aggregate line item for “customs duties,” but we must have more detailed information to see precisely which firms, particularly small businesses, are shouldering the frontline cash burden of these tariff taxes. Therefore, we ask that you provide data regarding the revenues from IEEPA tariffs.

Specifically, please provide the following breakdown of the customs duties collected for the year 2024 and 2025:

Revenues collected on imports by country of origin.
Revenues collected for each Section of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule.
Revenues collected by the geographic location or state of the U.S. importers liable for payment of the duties.
The name and specific amount of revenue collected from each of the top 500 U.S. importers responsible for the highest level of duty payments
Further, Congress must also have detailed information in order to enable proper oversight and inform possible legislative action with respect to the fiscal fallout of remediating these illegal tariffs.

As you know, many companies now are pursuing refund claims through litigation.[2] Refunds, however, must not be limited to those businesses that chose to litigate or can afford to initiate litigation to seek the relief they are entitled to in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling. All businesses must have substantial clarity that the Administration will move forward with a timely, transparent, and equitable process for refunding money to which the government is not legally entitled.

Therefore, I request a detailed explanation of the Department of Treasury’s plans to process tariff refunds and the anticipated timeline for implementation. If there are no such plans in place, I urge the Department of Treasury to begin planning immediately for a tariff refund process that takes into account the following key considerations:

Procedures that are transparent;
Applicability to all affected parties, regardless of the status or disposition in the liquidation pr…
Today's decision is so important because consumers all over our state and the country have been hurt. Small businesses, manufacturers, individual households have all had to pay higher prices on products that they can't afford. (1/2)
Today is the Day of Remembrance for Japanese internment, a day to remember that Japanese Americans were stripped of their freedom for no other reason than their heritage. We must continue to learn from this dark chapter in American history.
Childcare is a crisis in America, and we know parents need better options. Today in Spokane, I stood with parents, childcare providers, and local leaders to announce a new affordable childcare facility. By lowering these costs, we're easing the burden on families.
Senator Cantwell speaking at press conference to announce new childcare center in Spokane
Our hearts and prayers are with the Jackson family and the millions of supporters who understand the importance of the work he carried out both nationally and internationally most of his adult life. (2/2)
To further protect consumers’ pocketbooks, Congress should pass the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act that will make PBMs’ spread pricing and claw backs permanently unlawful. (3/3)
The FTC can - and should - do even more to stop PBMs from engaging in unfair practices that drive up drug prices for Americans and force independent pharmacies out of business. (2/3)
Gonzaga's world-class researchers are leading the way – and ushering in the technologies of tomorrow. Great talking to President Passerini about how new federal funding will bolster Gonzaga's R&D mission and unlock opportunities across the Spokane region.
Sen. Cantwell and President Passerini
Team USA, America is so proud of you! The United States is sending its largest Winter Olympics team ever—232 athletes from 32 states, including 10 from WA—to compete in the 2026 Games.
Washington Athletes at the 2026 Winter Olympics
Ben Richardson, Curling, Issaquah
Luc Violette, Curling, Lake Stevens
Katie Henson, Skiing, Redmond
Breezy Johnson, Skiing, WWU
Novie McCabe, Skiing, Winthrop
Jackie Wiles, Skiing, White Pass
Anna Gibson, Ski Mountaineering, UW
Eunice Lee, Speed Skating, Bellevue
Cooper McLeod, Speed Skating, Burlington
Corinne Stoddard, Speed Skating, Tacoma
The Trump Administration is demanding our state’s voter rolls so they can get personal information about Washingtonians. You can't spy on Americans. My appearance on Morning Joe ⬇️
Americans have the right to express their views without being killed. We should know that we are upholding civil liberties. The Department of Homeland Security and ICE should be investigated. My speech on the Senate floor ⬇️
Pam Bondi has sued Washington state to get sensitive voter data. I’m standing strong against efforts to undermine our voting system. Democracies don't grow on trees. They need to be protected, defended, and fought for. My letter to AG Bondi ⬇️
Letter to AG Bondi, pages 1 and 2
Letter to AG Bondi, pages 3 and 4
Letter to AG Bondi, pages 5 and 6
#BlackHistoryMonth is a time to celebrate the immense contributions of Black Americans to our society, culture, and politics. We also recommit ourselves to fighting racial inequities and ensuring equality for all Americans.
Black History Month
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
772 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESNOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16