
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Tennessee District 9
Steve Cohen
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 568
Yes40%
No55%
Present1%
Not Voting5%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 9
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Steve Cohen
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTennessee District 9
SoupScore
Steve's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 55 sponsored · 313 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reposted bySteve Cohen
Donald Trump will use his 2nd term to bury the full extent of Special Counsel Smith's findings and shield his accomplices. I wrote to AG Garland urging him to act NOW: drop the charges against Nauta & De Oliveira, release the report, and let the truth see the light of day. Time is running out.
Donald Trump will use his 2nd term to bury the full extent of Special Counsel Smith's findings and shield his accomplices. I wrote to AG Garland urging him to act NOW: drop the charges against Nauta & De Oliveira, release the report, and let the truth see the light of day. Time is running out.
Pleased to be joined by @keating.house.gov, Rep. Joe Wilson, & Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar as original co-sponsors of the Combating Global Corruption Act. More info on the bill here: cohen.house.gov/media-center...
Corruption fuels authoritarian dictatorships, human rights abuses, & global instability—fighting it should be at the core of US foreign policy. As a senior member of the US Helsinki Commission, that’s why I reintroduced the Combating Global Corruption Act today to hold corrupt actors accountable.
Jack Smith’s subtle indictment of the Supreme Court.
As James Carville would say-ITS THE SUPREME COURT STUPID.
God,have mercy ….
Reposted bySteve Cohen
I have let my position be known to the Biden administration and others of influence that Merrick Garland act immediately to have the special counsel’s report on the classified documents case released to the public.
It can be done
but it will take immediate action by the DOJ.Trust/transparency!NOW
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/14/u...
TRUMP WOULD HAVE BEEN CONVICTED, JACK SMITH AND STEVE COHEN AND A JURY OF HIS PEERS
It’s not clear if Melania’s hand was heading in the area of her heart as it only was around stomach level or if she was simply getting her hand away from Donalds
I have let my position be known to the Biden administration and others of influence that Merrick Garland act immediately to have the special counsel’s report on the classified documents case released to the public.
It can be done
but it will take immediate action by the DOJ.Trust/transparency!NOW
Which “first” family hasn’t learned political ( or even non political) decorum?
Yes, he shouldn’t be on the court, but if he resigns Trump will probably appoint a Cannon fool and Florida who is much younger and much more of a supplicant well, maybe the same amount of a supplicant
AG Garland needs to dismiss case against 2 remaining defendants in Trump classified records case and then release Smiths report on January 19. Trumps’ AG will dismiss cases but not the report. ACT NOW!
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/11/u...
HATS OFF 🎩 TO A PATRIOT AND SCHOLAR. SHOULD HAVE BEEN APPOINTED YEAR EARLIER.
@Cnn.com Scott Jennings is frequently beyond reality in his outrageous MAGA zeal. He needs to be replaced with a logical Republican, not a crazed flame thrower.
“I Did Nothing Wrong”: Inside Donald Trump’s Hush Money Sentencing - Vanity Fair
ROY COHN TAUGHT HIM- NEVER ADMIT FAULT-NEVER
ROY IS THE DEVIL WHO MENTORED HIM.
Biden mass clemency for Fed. And DC marijuana possession ‘22 and ‘23. Not enough I know however….
More here on my Constitutional amendment to limit the presidential pardon power: cohen.house.gov/media-center...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History568 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
568 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 4275 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3357 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 1917 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3937 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3351 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-21 | H.R. 3095 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H.R. 4016 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-18 | H. Res. 590 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 1919 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-17 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-16 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Motion to Reconsider | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 1717 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-07-15 | H. Res. 580 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | S. 1596 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1770 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-14 | H.R. 1709 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Accept Senate changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-03 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.