Every hardworking American deserves a livable wage. It’s time to pass the Raise the Wage Act.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 28
Judy Chu
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 594
Yes43%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 28
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Judy Chu
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 28
SoupScore
Judy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 39 sponsored · 286 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
The federal minimum wage has remained at $7.25 since 2009.
Since then, its value has declined by 30% as prices for basic necessities continue to rise. Today, the minimum wage is a poverty wage, with full-time workers earning less than the federal poverty line.
And, thank you to Lee Thomas Miller, a Grammy-nominated songwriter and producer, for giving us a wonderful performance of two of your original songs!
This week, I met with Nashville Songwriters Association International (NSAI) to discuss how Congress can support musicians and other artists, including by protecting their work in the age of AI and passing my bipartisan bill to restore artists' ability to deduct their everyday business expenses.
There are more than 25 million AANHPIs, yet we only represent about 1% of elected officials. That’s why we must recommit ourselves to building a future where every community has a seat at the table, every person has the opportunity to be heard, & every future generation has the opportunity to lead.
This weekend, I attended the 2026 AAPI LEAD Summit to celebrate our fantastic AANHPI leaders from all across the nation.
As Chair Emerita of @capac.house.gov, I know how important it is to have spaces dedicated to representing, celebrating, and understanding our diverse communities. Congressional caucuses like CAPAC enable us to serve Americans better, plain and simple.
An Administration that already has a track record of repeatedly trying to throw people with disabilities off their benefits should never be given free reign to conduct open-ended experiments that could reduce benefits.
I voted NO.
But it does this by handing the Trump Administration broad new authority to test changes to the program, with no guardrails to protect people's earned benefits.
Today, House Republicans passed the Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act, a bill that claims to help remove barriers to employment for people receiving Social Security disability benefits.
An Administration that already has a track record of repeatedly trying to throw people with disabilities off their benefits should never be given free reign to conduct open-ended experiments that could reduce benefits.
I voted NO.
But it does this by handing the Trump Administration broad new authority to test changes to the program, with no guardrails to protect people's earned benefits.
Trump must follow the law and end this illegal war. It's time to put American families first.
Once again, the House has adopted a bipartisan War Powers Resolution to stop Trump's illegal war in Iran.
18 American service members have died and the affordability crisis is spiraling further out of control.
THIS is the transparency Americans deserve.
That’s why today in @waysmeanscmte.bsky.social I introduced my amendment to ensure that presidential libraries – and the tax-exempt organizations that operate them like Trump’s Presidential Library Foundation – are subject to the requirements of the Foreign Funding Transparency Act.
If Republicans are serious about ensuring certain tax-exempt organizations report contributions received from foreign nationals, then they should also be serious about holding Trump to those same standards.
Imagine wanting to donate to your local nonprofit organization only to be met with intrusive questions about your nationality. Those are the unnecessary barriers Republicans are attempting to enforce by advancing the Foreign Funding Transparency Act.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History594 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
594 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | H.R. 832 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-24 | H.R. 825 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-13 | H.R. 35 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-12 | H.R. 77 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-11 | H. Res. 122 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 736 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-10 | H.R. 692 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-07 | H.R. 26 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12