Yet again, Trump is refusing to answer for the complete disaster he created.
He doesn’t care that Americans are paying the price for his reckless war with Iran, and neither do Republicans in Congress.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 28
Judy Chu
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 568
Yes42%
No57%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 28
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Judy Chu
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 28
SoupScore
Judy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 267 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
These outstanding students reflect the talent, determination, and commitment to discovery that define CA-28's STEM community. I can't wait to see all they accomplish through this opportunity!
Congratulations to Ryan Chen from La Cañada-Flintridge and Max Shawn Zhou from San Marino for being selected as finalists for the Center for Excellence in Education’s 2026 USA Biolympiad!
I will continue to push for legislation like my Foster Youth Postsecondary Education Access and Success Act and my Increasing Access to Foster Care Through Age 21 Act so all youth have the support needed to thrive.
Her passion for improving access to education and healthcare for older foster youth was inspiring.
Today on #FosterYouthShadowDay26, I was excited to welcome Jo Harlan, a remarkable young leader and NFYInstitute delegate. She told me about her experiences in foster care and the unique challenges she and other youth face.
Seems like Trump was being honest when he said he doesn’t think about Americans' financial situations.
Inflation crossed 4% in May for the first time in 3 years. It's up from 2.4% in February before the war with Iran.
Americans are paying more for gas, groceries, housing, and basic necessities and Trump and Republicans are letting it happen.
That’s why @housebudgetdems.bsky.social and I are voting NO on the Secure America Act.
Prices are up for gas, groceries, health care, & housing - and families are hurting. But instead of addressing this cost-of-living crisis, Republicans are choosing to dump $70 billion more for ICE & Trump's immigration agencies without enforcing any basic standards & accountability. It's shameful.
That’s why I’m a proud cosponsor of @reptimkennedy.bsky.social's DHS Release Transparency Act, which will require DHS to provide translation and interpretation services to detainees in their custody.
Everyone deserves to be treated with dignity and humanity.
With limited English proficiency, he was never meaningfully informed of what was happening or given the opportunity to contact his family or attorney. Language access could have saved his life.
In February, DHS abandoned Nurul Amin Shah Alam, who was nearly blind, outside a closed coffee shop in freezing temperatures. He was found dead days later.
This week, Republicans are pushing a bill to give an additional $70 BILLION to DHS with no oversight or accountability. Rewarding a rogue agency while working families struggle to afford the basics is cruel and reckless. I will be voting NO.
Prices are soaring, deaths in ICE custody are at record highs, and Trump's DHS refuses to implement even the most basic reforms—even after its actions contributed to the deaths of two American citizens in broad daylight.
This website exploits a vulnerable moment in women's lives to advance an ideological agenda rather than providing the medically accurate, evidence-based information that pregnant women deserve.
Moms.gov claims to support for expectant mothers, but instead directs users to anti-abortion centers that have a documented history of providing misleading reproductive health information and collecting sensitive personal data.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Today, I join @reprocaucus.bsky.social and @demwomencaucus.bsky.social to recommit to safeguarding access to contraception. Everyone deserves the freedom to decide if, when, and how to build a family.
61 years ago, Griswold v. Connecticut struck down a law criminalizing birth control & affirming that politicians have no place in Americans' private reproductive decisions.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History568 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
568 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12