Catherine Cortez Masto headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Nevada
Born
March 29, 1964
Age 62
Phone
(202) 224-3542
Office
309 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada

Catherine Cortez Masto

Voting Record — 890
Yes36%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align92%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Catherine Cortez Masto headshot
Catherine Cortez Masto
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Catherine's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 118 sponsored · 271 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

No racial profiling, no detaining U.S. citizens, real standards and accountability - none of this is unreasonable, it's what Americans are demanding. We've had plenty of time to work on these commonsense reforms, but we're not yet seeing good faith from the GOP or this White House.
Usually, families might use their tax refund to buy their kids new clothes, or even enjoy a well-earned vacation. This year, more and more Americans will have to use their refund to make up for the higher costs Trump's tariffs have imposed on all of us.
Holding ICE to the same standards as state and local law enforcement isn't unreasonable. Upholding our constitutional rights isn’t either. These aren't Democratic demands, they're commonsense reforms that Americans are insisting on across this country.
Donald Trump and his cronies are claiming that he's ended inflation. The truth is just the opposite. I hear from families in Nevada who are struggling with soaring costs, and they deserve leaders who will work to lower those costs.
No solo lo hemos visto en Nevada. En todo los EE.UU., trabajadores andan perdiendo no solo dinero, sino sus empleos también por el daño que Trump ha hecho a nuestra economía turística. Por eso he introducido una propuesta para invertir en esta industria y levantar a los trabajadores.
Donald Trump's incompetent tariff tax strategy has raised costs for American manufacturers, pushed up prices for our families, and potentially killed thousands of jobs. There's a smart way to use tariffs to protect key American industries. This isn't it.
Americans want federal law enforcement to hold criminals accountable. They want their Constitutional rights respected. And they want commonsense standards like the ones local police already follow.   These are reasonable reforms Republicans need to work with us to pass now.
Another continuing resolution is not a solution. Republicans need to be working with us now on the sensible reforms Americans are demanding to keep our communities safe and stop the abuses the Trump Admin. has engaged in across our country.
The list of reforms Democrats put forward are commonsense and reasonable policies that state and local law enforcement already follow across the country. And, it's what the American people are insisting on to protect our rights. It's up to Republicans now to come to the table.
When I push Trump and his cronies on what they're doing to lower costs, they point to No Tax on Tips. Now, I support No Tax on Tips. But what good does that do for hospitality workers if Trump's recklessness drives away tourists and they lose their jobs?
If you missed it yesterday - @democrats.senate.gov called up a bill to allow the Senate to sue for the release of the remaining Epstein Files. Republicans blocked it. Why are Senate Republicans standing in the way of truth and transparency?
Last year, my Epstein Files Transparency Act became law, requiring the Trump administration to release ALL of the Epstein files. They have continued to break the law by releasing ONLY A FRACTION of the files. (1/2)
I introduced a bipartisan bill today to help grow our tourism industry with our partners in Canada and Mexico. With all of the damage this President and his cronies have done to our economy, I will continue working to put Nevadans first.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-08-08S. 5271 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2026-08-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-49)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Kill the motionNOYESMotion to Table Agreed to (61-32)
2026-08-07H.R. 6500 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07S. Res. 817 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Vote on amendmentNOYESAmendment Rejected (32-64)
2026-08-05S.J. Res. 187 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-08-05S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-08-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2026-08-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-08-03H.R. 6500 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-30S. Res. 817 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOResolution Agreed to (50-47)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 181 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 199 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-07-29S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-07-29H.R. 5334 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12)
2026-07-28H.R. 5334 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-07-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-47)
2026-07-23S.J. Res. 180 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-49)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-07-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (46-44)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (85-5)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →