Gas prices, housing, energy, groceries - Nevadans can see costs soaring all around us, and we need the President focused on bringing those prices back down. Instead, he’s making it worse.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Nevada
Catherine Cortez Masto
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 840
Yes36%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align91%
Cross-party8%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Catherine Cortez Masto
U.S. SenatorDemocratNevada
SoupScore
Catherine's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 105 sponsored · 251 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Republicans in the Senate should be ashamed that they voted to prevent a report into Hernández’s record in Honduras that could show the extent of these crimes. (2/2)
Juan Orlando Hernández is a drug trafficking criminal who raked in millions helping El Chapo smuggle drugs into the United States. That’s the man Trump pardoned. (1/2)
Today, I’m forcing a vote to require the Trump Admin. to give us details about Hernandez’s human rights violations and his country’s relationship to drug traffickers under his leadership. (2/2)
Former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández is a convicted drug trafficker who helped smuggle cocaine into the United States and took bribes from El Chapo. Donald Trump gave him a pardon. (1/2)
Reposted bySen. Catherine Cortez Masto
In March, Trump said that no taxpayer would put up even 10 cents for his ballroom. Now, taxpayers are covering more than half of his $600 million project.
Can the president stop lying to the American people?
That’s why I’m fighting for this legislation to cut bureaucracy and unlock our country’s full potential. (2/2)
subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eene...
In Nevada, we’ve felt the impact of presidential overreach and government red tape that’s held up key solar energy projects – and thousands of jobs with them. I believe that we need an all-of-the-above approach to energy, not the President picking winners and losers. (1/2)
Think about what you could do with an extra $2,900.
That’s what President Trump is taking from Americans by driving up costs with his reckless tariffs and war of choice.
Trump lied again.
Taxpayers are footing the bill for his ridiculous golden ballroom while working Americans lose their health care because of his policies.
All that Dreamers are asking for is the same freedoms and opportunities that our Founding Fathers envisioned for this country 250 years ago. America was founded as a nation of immigrants. It is who we are and what makes our country great, and we can never lose sight of that.
My Tribal Warrant Fairness Act would ensure Tribal law enforcement have the same tools as state and local police to protect their communities.
Right now, U.S. Marshals are restricted from helping Tribal law enforcement find and arrest fugitives and help search for missing children. I just passed a bill in the Senate to change that.
DACA recipients’ shining success prove that immigrants are a benefit to this country. They work hard, they give back, and they are just as American as each of us. They deserve our support, not the cruel racism coming from this President. (2/2)
Why is the Trump Admin. going after DACA recipients? Because Trump and Stephen Miller have decided what “Real Americans” look and sound like, and that’s not Dreamers. (1/2)
We’ve had enough of the political games. Americans agree that Dreamers should have an earned pathway to citizenship. Let’s get it done.
DACA has allowed individuals who were brought to America as children to come out of the shadows and live the American Dream. But as this program comes under repeated attack, it’s clear that we need legislation like the Dream Act to give Dreamers the stability they deserve.
youtu.be/qeq4_r2PPVA
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History840 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
840 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17