
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 31
Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes43%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 31
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 31
SoupScore
Gilbert Ray's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 12 sponsored · 68 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I spoke out last night because that was 100 mins of B.S.
Meanwhile in the real world, the President's tariffs are tanking our economy and making life harder for everyday Americans.
My guest for tonight's SOTU is West Covina City Councilman Ollie Cantos. He served at the U.S. Department of Education, but he was placed on leave due to Elon Musk’s DOGE cuts. I hope his presence reminds Trump and Musk that their contempt for our country’s civil servants is harming American lives.
Republican leadership wants to fund our government with a year-long Continuing Resolution. If we have a government shutdown because of this horrible idea, it's on them. I went to the House floor this morning to call them out on it:
www.instagram.com/reel/DGyXfVi...
We need humane comprehensive immigration reform that addresses bad actors, but still upholds our American values and helps bring immigrants who have been living in our country out of the shadows. My office will continue to monitor this situation.
Stoking fear, targeting our community members, and ripping apart families is not an acceptable solution for our broken immigration system.
This El Monte family was simply trying to care for the youngest daughter and work to provide her with the healthcare treatments she needs.
These arrests are sickening, and I have grave concerns with how these arrests were reported to have been carried out by ICE. The 31st District is home to many immigrant families who came to our country wanting to contribute to our communities and local economy.
@repharder.bsky.social @repgaramendi.bsky.social and all CA have your people call my people.
Let's get this party started!
Team Harder is trying their best but happy to help my fellow Californian.
Who knew that Southern California members would figure out tech faster than the Northern California member.
President Trump and Vice President Vance's views on Ukraine remain out of touch with reality. Their meeting with President Zelensky was disastrous and disgraceful. Once again, Trump is proving he is nothing more than a stooge for Putin. www.nytimes.com/live/2025/02...
AAPI communities in LA struggled to access emergency alerts during the LA wildfires -- an example of why the President's latest EO is dangerous and dumb. This is another attack on diverse communities that don't fit into Trump's outdated view of America. apnews.com/article/trum...
(3) Republicans need to get their s**t together. They control the White House, they control Congress. If we have a government shutdown, it falls on them and their inability to govern.
(2) Now, House Republicans are talking about a Continuing Resolution (CR) for the remainder of the year. A year long CR would negatively impact our military capabilities and create economic uncertainty and job insecurity. In short, a year long CR hurts the American people and our economy.
(1) The government funding bills should have been completed last year. But House Republicans made the political decision to punt them into 2025 because they wanted to wait for Trump to move into the White House. Well, they got what they wanted, but still haven't been able to pass any new funding.
These are pilots, cyber specialists, medical professionals and leaders at every level — individuals in whom we have invested millions in training and development. "
This investment isn’t just financial; it represents years of specialized training intended to build the next generation of military leadership.
"The cost to our nation’s defense of a ban is substantial and multifaceted. First, we lose qualified service members who are meeting and exceeding our standards.
thehill.com/opinion/5164...
This administration keeps arguing they want to make merit-based decisions, but they are clearly attacking our transgender servicemembers simply because they are transgender. This decision undermines our military readiness and national security. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
Washington Republicans claim to support families, but their budget slashes Medicaid by $880 billion and disproportionately harms women and children. Their budget is an attack on Americans' health. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/u...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-14 | H. Res. 992 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 4593 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2312 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2270 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 2262 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H. Res. 988 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6504 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-13 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-12 | H.R. 2683 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-09 | H.R. 5184 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 1834 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 131 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 504 (119th) | Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary Notwithstanding | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Divisions B and C | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-08 | H.R. 6938 (119th) | Retaining Division A | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 780 (119th) | Motion to Discharge | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-07 | H. Res. 977 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2026-01-06 | — | Call of the House | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 498 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 845 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 1366 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-18 | H.R. 4776 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3492 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 6703 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H.R. 3616 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 64 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Con. Res. 61 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-17 | H. Res. 953 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 3632 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-12-16 | H.R. 4371 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-12-16 | H. Res. 951 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.