Greg Casar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Texas District 35
Born
1989
Age 37
Phone
(202) 225-5645
Office
446 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Texas District 35

Greg Casar

Voting Record — 498
Yes30%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting19%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 35

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Greg Casar headshot
Greg Casar
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratTexas District 35
SoupScore
Greg's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 6 sponsored · 122 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Corporations shouldn’t be allowed to use your private data to jack up prices with AI. I introduced the first federal ban on ‘surveillance pricing’ because companies using private info to rip people off is unacceptable.
Trump gets: $5 billion in crypto deals, a $400 million plane, a $300 million ballroom, millions in deals from Facebook, Amazon, CBS.  Everyone else gets: higher prices for health care, electricity, and groceries.   Corruption, plain and simple.
These are just a few of the stories I heard from working Texans. But their pain is being felt across the country. I won’t support any “deal” that doesn’t make health care more affordable. Anything else is a betrayal of millions of Americans.
Health care premiums for Patricia’s family in Buda would be $400 higher every month. “We have a four year old and I am in school. Not having insurance is scary, but we can't afford it,” she told me.
Jessalynn from San Antonio said her family will have to lose their current plan — because they can’t afford another $300 a month in premiums. “That’s not even counting the medications we have to be on and can't afford to stop taking.”
John from Kyle: “We're dropping health insurance entirely. Screw the GOP for sabotaging health care in America.” His monthly payment was $1,260 in 2025. If Trump and Republicans get their way, he would pay $1,767 a month in 2026.
James from Austin told me the cost of his health insurance could jump from $142/month to $436/month — or $839/month if he goes with another policy. “As a diabetic, bipolar, and with upcoming hernia surgery, I must have health coverage,” he said.
Marisol from San Antonio told me the total cost for her family’s plan could go from $1,777 to $2,948 — increased by 66%. “We are kind of terrified. We’ve relied on the ACA for our family's health insurance for several years. But this may no longer be possible.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
498 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGYESAgreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HouseNOT_VOTINGPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNOT_VOTINGNOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeNOT_VOTINGYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 3 / 10Next →