
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Colorado District 1
Diana DeGette
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 583
Yes42%
No57%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 1
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources

Diana DeGette
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratColorado District 1
SoupScore
Diana's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 79 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
My full statement on the One Big Ugly Bill.
Just as bad, their bill adds trillions to the national debt and worsens our deficit— even as the so-called most fiscally conservative GOP members just voted to pass it.
Jeffries was right — in Colorado, we’d say these folks are all hat, no cattle. Shameful.
House Democrats will press on!
During his record-breaking speech, Leader Jeffries called out House GOP’s hypocrisy & extremism.
They’ll have to explain to their constituents why they supported a bill to gut Medicaid & SNAP, and defund Planned Parenthood, after publicly railing against the devastating cuts they just voted for.
Republicans say the Big Ugly Bill targets “waste, fraud, and abuse,” but what they really mean is cutting qualified people off a lifeline they rely on.
In fact, Medicaid coverage for ~377,000 Coloradans could be at risk.
Kicking people off their insurance to fund billionaire tax cuts is cruel.
Reposted byRep. Diana DeGette
Republicans have launched a full-out assault on reproductive health care.
Donald Trump's Big Ugly Bill by the numbers.
Here’s how the Big Ugly Bill would impact Colorado’s 8th District.
🏥 29,000 people would lose access to healthcare
🍞 30,000 households would lose access to food nutrition programs
⚡️ Nearly 1,000 energy jobs will be lost
Colorado can’t afford the Big Ugly Bill.
We won't stand by as House Republicans try to pass this monstrosity that slashes health care, food assistance, reproductive care, & more just to line the pockets of billionaires. (2/2)
House Democrats and I are calling out Donald Trump’s Big Ugly Bill for what it is—a cruel and staggering attack on our most vulnerable communities. (1/2)
More than 1.2 million Coloradans rely on Medicaid—yet Trump’s Big Ugly Bill would put their care at risk.
By imposing onerous paperwork requirements, over 377,000 Coloradans could lose coverage.
I won’t stand by while Republicans gut the care that hard-working families rely on.
While families struggle to make ends meet, Trump is working overtime this week to bankroll billionaires.
The One Big Ugly Bill is a scam, plain and simple.
Senate Republicans just forced through the Big Ugly Bill and it now comes back to the House.
I will be voting NO on this bill, and I will fight tooth and nail to stop Trump’s cruel cuts to health care and food benefits that the most vulnerable Coloradoans rely on.
Our state is home to some of the most unique and treasured landscapes in the country, and for many Coloradans and visitors, these outdoor spaces are what make life here so special. This National Park and Recreation Month, we’ll continue to work so that our parks are accessible and enjoyable for all.
Trump’s Big Ugly Bill would rip health care away from 16 million Americans—including kids, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities.
Hospitals may close and people could die, all so billionaires can get more tax breaks.
There is no justification for these cruel cuts.
🚨 The CBO found that the Senate’s version of Trump's Big Ugly Bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt.
This bill is a farce.
Not only will it drag our country into more debt, but it does nothing to make life better for hardworking families — no relief, no lower costs, no real solutions.
Research shows the lowest-cost path to cut Colorado’s emissions relies on renewable energy to keep energy affordable and reliable.
While Colorado has been a leader in clean energy, Trump's Big Ugly Bill will drag us backwards, putting jobs, grid reliability, & lower energy costs at risk.
The Fourteenth Amendment to our Constitution is clear: people born in the United States are citizens.
Today’s decision is a procedural loss, but we will continue fighting hard to preserve our Constitutional rights.
Trump’s Big Ugly Bill is dangerous, putting patients and providers at risk.
If his cuts to Medicaid are passed, Colorado hospitals could lose $10 billion, making it harder for Coloradans to get the care they need.
I’m fighting to stop it because our communities can’t afford these cruel cuts.
Over the past few months, we’ve seen a disturbing pattern of ICE agents arresting individuals while wearing masks & carrying no identification. This practice is completely inappropriate in our democracy. I’m sponsoring the No Secret Police Act to ensure federal officers can’t operate in the shadows.
NEW: As video and news reports of immigrants and U.S. citizens being detained by masked men claiming to be ICE agents continue to dominate headlines and spark fears from coast to coast, Attorney General Pam Bondi told Congress she had no idea this was happening.
www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-...
I won’t stop fighting against this extreme anti-choice agenda.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History583 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
583 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-06 | H.R. 27 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H. Res. 93 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-05 | H.R. 776 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-02-04 | H.R. 43 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 21 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 471 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-23 | H.R. 375 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 165 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H. Res. 53 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-22 | H.R. 187 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-21 | H.R. 186 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-16 | H.R. 30 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 33 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 144 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-15 | H.R. 164 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 28 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 153 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-14 | H.R. 152 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-13 | H.R. 192 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-09 | H.R. 23 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-07 | H.R. 29 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | Motion to Commit with Instructions | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-01-03 | H. Res. 5 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Election of the Speaker | NOT_VOTING | — | — | Johnson (LA) |
| 2025-01-03 | — | Call by States | PRESENT | — | — | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 12 / 12