Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 366 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

And as DOGE cuts continue, the VA Employee Fairness Act would restore collective bargaining rights for VA health care professionals so they can speak out freely against any problems they’re facing at the VA.   This Admin cannot continue to slash and burn the VA in the dark.
VA Secretary Collins may promise to rehire VCL workers he wrongfully fired, but here's the bottom line: He should be transparent with Congress.   The Protecting Veterans in Crisis Act would require him to report to Congress before any cuts to VCL are made.
BREAKING: Today, I'm introducing two bills to help protect our nation’s VA workers—including nurses, physicians and Veterans Crisis Line workers—and the Veterans they serve against Trump's ongoing attacks.   The Protecting Veterans in Crisis Act and the VA Employee Fairness Act 🇺🇸
Trump's layoffs at the VA were so reckless, they erroneously fired Veteran Crisis Line workers. That. Never. Should. Have. Happened. Tomorrow, I'm introducing legislation to protect this lifeline that supports our heroes in their hour of need.
Absolutely shameful.   Trump's trans military service ban hurts our military readiness, makes our military's recruitment challenges even worse and disrespects Americans who are brave enough to serve in uniform.   This will make our military less lethal and Americans less safe.
The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration may start enforcing a ban on transgender troops serving in the military that had been blocked by lower courts. It will remain in place while challenges to the ban move forward. nyti.ms/434QLnQ
Jan has been a champion for Illinois and progressive values for decades in Congress. I couldn't be more proud to call her a colleague and a friend—her leadership and her advocacy will be sorely missed. Congratulations @schakowsky.house.gov on your well-earned retirement!
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) told "Face The Nation" that she expects Mike Waltz to have a "brutal hearing" for U.N. ambassador after his surprise departure last week from his post as President Trump's national security adviser. https://cbsn.ws/44RpcRh
Mike Waltz is failing up.

He’s being rewarded for an egregious national security breach by being tapped for UN Ambassador—a slap in the face to the troops he put in greater danger with SignalGate.

I’ll be voting no.
The lethal high-powered rifles I carried during my military service were designed for war.   Not our streets. Not our neighborhoods. Certainly not our schools.   Senate Democrats introduced legislation to revive the nationwide assault weapons ban.   It’s long overdue.
Took long enough. Mike Waltz knowingly made an unclassified chain to discuss classified matters. But of all the idiots in that chat, Hegseth is the biggest security risk of all—he leaked the info that put our troops in greater danger. Fire and investigate them all. www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-m...
Happy Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month! No matter what Trump or Hegseth say, diversity *is* our greatest strength—and our AANHPI communities have proven that time and again. AANHPI stories are American stories. Always have been.
A graphic with the text: 'ASIAN AMERICAN, NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER HERITAGE MONTH'
SNAP programs create 200,000 jobs and billions in wages—along with putting food on the table for millions. Republicans' budget plans to eliminate this, putting people out of work and taking food out of families' mouths so they can fund billionaire tax breaks. Beyond cruel.
This is how you make America sicker, not healthier. Trump is cancelling almost a BILLION dollars in grants to clean up poisonous pollution, get rid of lead in drinking water and other projects that help protect the health of our families. Despicable. www.washingtonpost.com/climate-envi...
Trump’s first 100 days:   DOGE cuts. Fired Veterans. SignalGate. Trade wars. Higher grocery bills. Social Security benefits at risk. Deported citizens. Economy tanked.   This is no golden age for America.   It's a shitshow.
Absolutely awful. Devastated for the four who were killed by a car crash at an after school camp in Chatham. Thank you to IL State Police and all of the first responders on the ground who responded quickly to the scene. My heart is with the entire Chatham community, the victims and their families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (54-46)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (27-73)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14H.R. 1968 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-38, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-14S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESBill Passed (84-16)
2025-03-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNOYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (47-53)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →