Tammy Duckworth headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Illinois
Born
March 12, 1968
Age 58
Phone
(202) 224-2854
Office
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois

Tammy Duckworth

Ladda Tammy Duckworth is an American politician and Army National Guard veteran serving as the junior United States senator from Illinois, a seat she has held since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented Illinois's 8th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives from 2013 to 2017.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 783
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Tammy Duckworth headshot
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 49 sponsored · 366 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

It's almost graduation season for students across the nation. It should be a time of celebration—instead, we have students fleeing from a shooter on campus.   Enough.   Republicans must help us pass gun reform.   My thoughts are with the victims' loved ones and everyone at FSU.
Growing up, my family depended on food stamps. Today, millions rely on SNAP to get a square meal. With their budget, Republicans are proposing $12 billion in cuts to SNAP. Let's call this what it is: They're taking food out of children's mouths to fund tax cuts for billionaires.
Not only was he not given due process, the Trump Administration is now blatantly—and willfully—defying the Supreme Court's ruling. This is a dangerous escalation that threatens the rule of law. Bring Mr. Abrego Garcia home.
Beth Benike served our nation and then built a thriving small business helping parents and their babies. Trump’s 145% China tariff puts her business—and her home—at risk. Billionaires can bounce back—but for the middle class, Trump’s chaos is devastating. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/p...
18 years ago today, a shooter killed 32 and injured 17 at Virginia Tech.   And all these years later, America is still the only country where this type of tragedy is commonplace.   It’s shameful Republicans won’t work with us to pass commonsense gun reform and help us save lives.
My heart goes out to the families and loved ones of these servicemembers—just tragic news. I will be seeking more information from DoD about the circumstances of these deaths and what can be done to prevent them in the future.
Two service members were killed and a third seriously injured Tuesday morning in a vehicle accident near Santa Teresa, N.M., Joint Task Force Southern Border said in a news release.
Trump’s plans to gut the State Department would jeopardize our global standing and national security, do almost nothing to cut the deficit and send a loud invitation to China and Russia to fill the leadership vacuum Trump would single-handedly create. apnews.com/article/stat...
This is dangerous for democracy *and* distracts our military from its mission of protecting you. Separating the Armed Forces from civilian law enforcement is a core tenet of our democracy that helps protect you and your rights from government overreach. apnews.com/article/bord...
Americans pay into Social Security their entire working lives to live comfortably as seniors— But Elon Musk and Donald Trump don't care. Seniors are already seeing delays, and DOGE is teeing up more cuts to cripple the program. They're playing with YOUR money and YOUR future.
Trump's purging the military of highly-experienced senior officers. Why? Because he doesn't care about qualifications. He cares about loyalty. Our heroes—and our national security—deserve better. My op-ed for Fox News: www.foxnews.com/opinion/sen-...
As we continue to learn more about this deadly helicopter crash, I’m deeply saddened to learn the pilot grew up in Chicago and trained at Naval Station Great Lakes. I’m keeping his family and loved ones—as well as those of all 6 lost in this crash—in my thoughts.
The pilot killed in a New York City tourist helicopter crash on Thursday was from the Chicago area, a family member confirmed to ABC7. bit.ly/4j6NDhS
Trump is screwing over farmers BIG-TIME.

Tariffs are driving up the costs of selling their goods overseas, fertilizer AND farm equipment.

USAID cuts and soon-to-be SNAP cuts are taking away customers who would otherwise buy their produce.

It's just body blow after body blow.
If you want to know what Republicans value, look at their budget. It paves the way for massive cuts to Social Security, Medicaid and SNAP— And mammoth tax cuts for billionaires. Their top priority is pleasing Trump's golf pals and corporations shipping jobs overseas. Not you.
Yet another horrific helicopter crash. I’m heartbroken for the six lives that were cut short and thinking of their loved ones as we continue to monitor this tragedy. While we don’t yet know what happened, I remain laser-focused on keeping our skies safe.
BREAKING: All six people on board a helicopter that crashed into the Hudson River have died, a source says.
I am monitoring this tragic situation and am thinking of this officer's family, loved ones and co-workers today. If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, please know you are not alone. Help is available by phone, text, chat and videophone @988Lifeline, day or night.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
783 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-46)
2025-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (77-23)
2025-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-38)
2025-02-03Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-01-30End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (83-13)
2025-01-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (62-35)
2025-01-30Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (80-17)
2025-01-29End debateNOYESCloture Motion Agreed to (78-20)
2025-01-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (56-42)
2025-01-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (56-42)
2025-01-28H.R. 23 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-28Confirm nomineeNOYESNomination Confirmed (77-22)
2025-01-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (97-0)
2025-01-27Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (68-29)
2025-01-25End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-23)
2025-01-25Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-34)
2025-01-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-39)
2025-01-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-49)
2025-01-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (74-25)
2025-01-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (72-26)
2025-01-22S. 6 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-01-21Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46)
2025-01-20Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (99-0)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (64-35)
2025-01-20S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (75-24)
2025-01-17S. 5 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (46-49)
2025-01-15S. 5 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Agreed to (70-25)
2025-01-13S. 5 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10)
2025-01-09S. 5 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 16 / 16