There are only 33 people in America who make a billion dollars or more per year.
Republicans are ready to explode the deficit, shutter hospitals and rob kids of food—
So the top 0.00002% can get a tax cut they don’t need. Read that again.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois
Tammy Duckworth
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes29%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 61 sponsored · 423 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Republicans don't care how ugly this bill is.
They blocked amendments to:
Undo SNAP cuts.
Remove $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts.
Stop rural hospitals from closing.
Prevent premiums from spiking.
To them, it's about one thing and one thing only:
Tax cuts for billionaires.
This isn’t over yet. Spread the word.
Republicans' Big, Beautiful Bill would:
— Kick 16 million off their health care
— Close 1 out of 4 nursing homes
— Hike your energy bills
— Add at least $4 trillion to the national debt
It’s a gift to the rich and a disaster for families.
Trump is no savior of the middle class.
Firefighters, teachers, police officers, truck drivers—
All of these Americans are set to lose $500 on average as a result of Trump’s tariffs and his Big, Beautiful Bill.
Meanwhile, millionaires will get a $300,000 handout.
Hell no.
Today, we remember Stonewall. 🏳️🌈
No matter how much they try to erase this historic chapter, we will never forget the courageous group of LGBTQ+ Americans—led by trans women of color—who demanded equality, progress and the freedom to live as you are.
I’m begging my Republican colleagues. Please kill this abomination of a bill.
Once again, Trump's extremist Supreme Court is handing him even more power—enabling him to further infringe on our Constitution.
The Fourteenth Amendment is clear: if you're born in America, you are a citizen.
Trump is not a king above the law.
This fight is far from over.
By letting anti-choice states defund Planned Parenthood—
Trump’s Supreme Court threatens access to cancer screenings, life-saving medication and basic care.
Lives are at stake.
And while Republicans cheer, it will be their constituents who suffer the most.
BREAKING: Today, I'm introducing legislation to curb Donald Trump’s egregious misuse of the military as law enforcement.
Our nation's servicemembers should be defending Americans. Not policing them.
10 years ago, Obergefell v. Hodges affirmed what we already knew: love is love. 🏳️🌈
Democrats enshrined marriage equality into law—and we'll keep defending this right against Republican attacks.
If it weren’t for SNAP, I wouldn’t be where I am today.
Now, Republicans are trying to rip that lifeline away from millions of kids, Veterans and working families—just to hand more tax breaks to their billionaire buddies.
No one should go hungry so the rich can get richer.
“They’ll get over it.”
“We’re all going to die.”
Republicans don’t give a damn about their constituents facing life-or-death consequences if they gut Medicaid.
They’ll jam through this bill.
And leave everyone but billionaires to fend for themselves.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
LIVE NOW 🎧📺
@duckworth.senate.gov joins The People’s Cabinet with a warning for this moment:
– Trump’s dangerous Iran mindset
– How Dobbs would’ve blocked her IVF care
– Why Musk’s DOGE is hurting veterans
– What real leadership looks like in crisis
#SenDuckworth #IVF #DOGE #Veterans
👇
It’s deeply disturbing that FAA Administrator nominee Bryan Bedford refuses to commit to upholding the 1,500-hour pilot training standard.
After the DCA crash and surge in near-misses, now is NOT the time to weaken flight training requirements for pilots.
I’ll be voting no.
Reposted byTammy Duckworth
President Trump "wants to thump his chest" and is "itching to use America’s military might somewhere around the world.”
– @duckworth.senate.gov
Before he bombed Iran sites, she called him “the lead person drumming on the drums of war."
“Not in the interest of the United States.”
#ForeignPolicy
Trump bombing Iran was illegal and unjustified.
I ran for Congress to make sure our leaders consider the true costs of war.
And I will be in the Senate, standing on my titanium legs, demanding answers from Trump.
My statement:
Trump's tariffs are a tax hike on new parents.
Parents who can barely afford baby items—including strollers, car seats, cribs, high chairs and baby monitors—know who to blame.
"Liberation Day" was a failure—and families are still paying for it.
By repealing critical energy tax credits, Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill” would cost:
❌ $80 billion in U.S. manufacturing
❌ $50 billion in exports
❌ Up to $1,080 a year per household
This isn’t helping working Americans. It’s throwing them and our economy under the bus.
Trump campaigned on a promise to protect IVF. What’s the holdup?
Republicans control Congress.
I’m ready to help get it done.
It’s the least he could do since he’s the reason IVF is at risk in the first place.
But Trump is all talk. No action.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (66-28) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43) |
| 2025-02-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (24-76) |
| 2025-02-21 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-21 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-49) |
| 2025-02-20 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-02-19 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-02-18 | S. Con. Res. 7 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-45) |
| 2025-02-18 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (72-28) |
| 2025-02-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.