Make no mistake: Republicans are coming after Social Security that YOU pay into your entire life.
They want to pay for tax cuts for billionaires by making it harder for YOU to get access to YOUR money.
It’s wrong on so many levels.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois
Tammy Duckworth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting8%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 48 sponsored · 360 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Reminder: Trump’s tariffs are not a plan—just more economic chaos with a side of higher costs, especially for farmers and middle-class Americans.
While Trump and Elon Musk take a chainsaw to vital services and rip away resources that millions of Americans rely on—
Musk himself is lining his pockets with new government contracts left and right.
Republicans' response? A budget that encourages this corrupt agenda.
Trump's tariffs tanked the stock market, raised everyday costs across the board and are slashing retirement plans so many rely on—
And Republicans are responding with a glowing thumbs up by supporting this budget plan.
They don't care about you. They care about pleasing Trump.
Republicans' budget will give Trump the all-clear to do whatever he wants to fund billionaire tax cuts—
That includes ramping up attacks on Social Security.
Trump and Musk—both billionaires—are threatening Americans' hard-earned benefits, and Republicans are giving them a hand.
Shame on Republicans for supporting this budget and giving DOGE their full seal of approval to continue firing thousands of Veterans.
Trump and Musk have no idea what it takes to serve in uniform—and Republicans just greenlit their plans to keep kicking our heroes to the curb.
By moving this budget resolution forward, Republicans are putting themselves on the record supporting Trump's plans to dig into middle-class families' pockets to fund billionaire tax cuts.
It's a complete betrayal of the American people—but Republicans have no problem with it.
Every Republican who votes for this budget will be saying they're just fine with Trump's tariffs skyrocketing costs and tanking Americans' retirement plans—
Fine with Trump's plans to slash Medicare and Medicaid to fund billionaire tax breaks—
Fine with screwing you over.
Firing 10,000 workers from HHS will do nothing for efficiency, but it will jeopardize Medicare and Medicaid.
It will cause disruptions or backlog that could be a matter of life and death.
Republicans are playing with people's lives.
Again and again, Trump chooses loyalty to himself over keeping Americans safe.
Everyone who cares about our national security knows that General Haugh should be rehired and Pete Hegseth should be fired.
It’s that simple.
Grocery bills are already high enough.
Meanwhile, Trump's tariffs will make groceries even more expensive—and he expects us to just bear with him while he refuses to rule out the possibility of a recession.
That's one of the worst plans I've ever heard.
Hegseth recklessly sharing airstrike plans on an unclassified messaging app must be investigated—not just by DoD’s watchdog, but also by the FBI and Congress.
These senior Trump officials must be held accountable for needlessly putting our troops and national security at risk.
In Myanmar’s hour of need, the U.S. is nowhere to be found.
Meanwhile, China and Russia are providing life-saving aid, gaining goodwill and filling the leadership vacuum left by Trump and Elon Musk’s foolish retreat.
An international disgrace.
www.nytimes.com/2025/04/02/u...
Heartbreaking news. I extend my deepest condolences to the loved ones of all the servicemembers who were lost in this tragic training accident, including Sgt. Jose Duenez Jr. of Joliet, Illinois.
We honor and salute their service to this nation.
Gmail. Signal chats. What else???
This pattern is proof that this is an intentional policy by the Trump Admin to use unclassified platforms to discuss classified information.
How many servicemembers have been placed at greater risk?
This demands an investigation.
We knew that you don't title “Houthi PC Small Group” if it was the first time.
This is an egregious pattern that makes it clear:
These people obviously cannot keep our servicemembers—or any of us—safe.
Don't be fooled. Trump's "Liberation Day" is a disaster in the making for middle-class Americans.
Trump's tsunami of tariffs will make groceries and other everyday items more expensive, costing families an extra $6,000 a year.
That's the last thing Americans need right now.
A tearful moment that shouldn't go unnoticed.
Watch my friend @booker.senate.gov so passionately call out Trump and Elon Musk's complete betrayal of our Veterans.
Another important moment in Congress yesterday.
With their futile attempt to block new parents from voting remotely, Republican leaders once again proved they're not actually pro-family.
Not on this. Not on IVF. Not on lowering costs for middle-class families.
Not on anything.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History776 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
776 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Amendment Rejected (14-81) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (45-50) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.