Alex Pretti.
Renee Good.
Keith Porter.
Silverio Villegas González.
One life taken by Trump's violent, masked secret police is too many.
Republicans need to come to the table and help us rein them in.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Illinois
Tammy Duckworth
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes27%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting8%
Party align97%
Cross-party2%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Tammy Duckworth
U.S. SenatorDemocratIllinois
SoupScore
Tammy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 48 sponsored · 357 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Masked federal agents are gunning down American citizens in cold blood.
Kristi Noem is threatening the watchdog that’s supposed to investigate this Administration's abuse.
Things need to change. Fast.
Democrats are fighting to rein in Trump's DHS.
DHS IG denied my request for more coordinated investigations into Trump’s lawless agents.
Then, I learned Kristi Noem repeatedly reminded DHS’s IG that she can unilaterally kill any investigation.
Why would she do that? 🤔
Feels like a threat to me.
A Border Patrol agent shot her five times—then bragged about it to his buddies.
Today, a federal court ruled those texts must be released.
The American people deserve transparency just as much as Marimar deserves justice.
There is no excuse. We have seen these vile, hateful depictions before. We know its intent.
This blatant racism toward former President and First Lady Obama has no place in America.
Trump is a national embarrassment to our country.
ICE investigators were supposed to investigate the killing of Alex Pretti.
Instead, they investigated Alex. Not his killers.
With FBI now leading this probe, I’m calling on Kristi Noem and Kash Patel:
Remove all ICE agents from this investigation completely.
Trump wants to seize our elections and take away your right to vote so he can stay in power.
It’s un-American, authoritarian and dangerous.
www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...
All we’re asking Trump to do is finally start delivering on his campaign promise for free IVF.
Our federal workers deserve the same level of coverage as Members of Congress.
This should be a no-brainer.
History has proven that freedom isn’t guaranteed. It’s fought for.
This Black History Month reminds us we stand on the shoulders of civil rights leaders who peacefully protested, marched and demanded better from our government.
We won't let a wanna-be king trample our rights.
All Americans expect and deserve a government that tells the truth and doesn’t murder its own citizens.
Over the next two weeks, Republicans must prioritize the safety of the American people above all else.
This reign of terror from DHS, Border Patrol and ICE cannot continue.
Democrats are demanding three very reasonable safeguards to protect the American people:
Get Border Patrol out of our cities.
Independent investigations.
No masks and more body cams.
Trump's IRS lawsuit is demanding $10 billion from taxpayers.
$10 billion would pay for 4 months of ACA tax credits for millions who can't afford health care—because of him.
In Trump's ideal world, you make him richer.
While he makes you sicker and poorer.
Trump's ICE snatched this bright, happy 5-year-old from his driveway.
They shipped him 1,300 miles to suffer, without his mother, in a squalid Texas detention center.
And now he's growing ill.
Democrats are fighting to end this cruelty.
Liam is not a criminal. Let him go.
Trump’s illegal domestic deployments cost taxpayers $496 million—and counting.
Including $21 million in Illinois.
There’s no money for health care.
But half a billion to waste on intimidating Americans in their own communities.
This you, Rubio?
No one’s shocked the Trump Administration isn't pursuing a civil rights investigation into the killing of Alex Pretti. But everyone should be deeply disturbed.
There is no lie they won't tell to evade accountability.
Congress must force our watchdogs to hold independent investigations immediately.
Senate Republicans must be on the right side of history and help rein in Trump's lawless agents.
No more hard-earned taxpayer dollars on ICE or Border Patrol. No more lies.
We need guardrails against their abuses, independent investigations and accountability.
On International Holocaust Remembrance Day, we mourn the six million Jews and millions of others targeted, abducted and murdered by the Nazi regime.
Together, let us honor their memory by rooting out hate and antisemitism wherever we may see it.
Never again.
Too many have died. Trump can fire or demote whoever he wants, but the buck stops with him.
There must be accountability for everyone involved.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/202...
Here it is. For the third time.
I'm calling on DHS and DOJ's IGs to heed the public outcry and finally launch a joint task force to investigate the horrific pattern of brutality from Trump's agents, including the public execution of Alex Pretti.
We demand accountability. Now.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-36) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-02 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 89 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (49-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 89 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 87 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-45) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 87 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-22 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 88 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-44) |
| 2025-05-21 | H.J. Res. 88 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Joint Resolution S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Joint Resolution Passed (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
| 2025-05-21 | S.J. Res. 55 (119th) | Point of Order S.J.Res. 55 | NO | NO | ✓ | Point of Order Sustained (51-46) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.