Trump pressured Republicans in Congress to pass his tax cuts for the rich.
When will he pressure House Republicans, who have been defunding the DC police for 5 months and counting? They're blocking DC from using $1 billion of locally raised taxes to fully fund police and other services.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|Pennsylvania District 3
Dwight Evans
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 536
Yes38%
No54%
Present1%
Not Voting8%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Congressional District 3
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Dwight Evans
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratPennsylvania District 3
SoupScore
Dwight's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 13 sponsored · 194 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
More taxes on you, but not on Trump!
As hard-working Americans are paying more for everyday items, from food to clothing to appliances, thanks to Trump’s tariffs— the president is keeping gold exempt from his reckless tariff strategy. #LetThemEatTariffs
Another distraction from the Epstein files Trump promised to release?
I applaud @pahousedems.com for being in session today & tomorrow and I urge PA Senate Republicans to get serious about funding transit for all of PA - now.
/2
Without their 3 SE PA members, Senate Republicans wouldn’t have a majority. And if they damage PA’s largest economic engine (SE PA), they will shrink the pie & there will be less money to spend on their own districts’ needs.
/1
Thank you to my district office intern, Uzo, for your hard work in Philadelphia this summer!
If you’re interested in interning in my Philly or DC office this fall, the deadline to apply has been extended to August 15! Learn more about how to apply here: evans.house.gov/services/int...
Not only do congressional Republicans not want to release the Epstein files - they closed Congress to dodge voting on the issue.
In Congress, alongside my @housedemocrats.bsky.social colleagues, I will continue to fight against these devastating actions by President Trump & work to keep our sacred promise to care for our veterans when they come home.
Our veterans have proudly served our nation and defended our freedom.
This union-busting by the Trump administration is a direct attack on workers’ rights and will make it harder for veterans to receive the benefits and care they have earned.
Under Trump & congressional Republicans' new budget law, more than 300,000 Pennsylvanians will lose their health care coverage.
If you get coverage through Geisinger Health Plan, Keystone First, or another state-funded managed care organization, these cuts could impact you.
Promises made. Promises broken.
And it’s hard-working Americans who will pay the price.
Reposted byCongressman Dwight Evans
The Department of Justice hired a former Jan. 6 defendant who was caught on tape urging rioters to "kill" police. The department calls him a "valued member" of the administration.
On the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, this fundamental right is under attack by extreme gerrymandering like in Texas, voter suppression, and election subversion.
It’s far past time we pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, to protect the right to vote for ALL.
(And other than a drug trial, if a drug company is actually paying you to take their medication, please let my office know!)
Have YOUR drug prices come down – or gone up? Trump is claiming he got drug companies to cut prices by 1,500% - which would mean the companies would be paying YOU to take their medicines.
Is this the same “math” determining his illegal, chaotic tariff scheme?
RSVP is optional; today’s South Philly event ends at 6:30 p.m.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History536 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
536 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-02 | H. Res. 566 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-27 | H. Res. 516 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 275 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-26 | H.R. 875 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-25 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Approve amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Agreed to |
| 2025-06-25 | H. Res. 519 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as Amended | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 530 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-24 | H. Res. 537 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3422 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 3394 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-23 | H.R. 1998 (119th) | Fast-track passage | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 2056 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-12 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 331 (119th) | Final passage | NO | YES | ✕ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-11 | H. Res. 499 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 884 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H.R. 2096 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-10 | H. Res. 489 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 481 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H. Res. 488 (119th) | Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-09 | H.R. 2035 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-06 | H.R. 2966 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2987 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-05 | H.R. 2931 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H.R. 2483 (119th) | Approve amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-04 | H. Res. 458 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1804 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-06-03 | H.R. 1642 (119th) | Fast-track passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-22 | S.J. Res. 31 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | End debate now | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | H. Res. 436 (119th) | Consideration of the Resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
| 2025-05-22 | — | Motion to Adjourn | YES | YES | ✓ | Failed |
| 2025-05-20 | S.J. Res. 13 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Passed |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.