This blueprint sets the foundation for cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, and other critical federal programs—no other way for $1.5 TRILLION in cuts without doing so.
Exactly why I voted a hard NO in the Senate.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Pennsylvania
John Fetterman
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes42%
No51%
Present0%
Not Voting7%
Party align81%
Cross-party19%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
John Fetterman
U.S. SenatorDemocratPennsylvania
SoupScore
John's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 28 sponsored · 281 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Increased fares, bus routes eliminated, rail service reduced—this isn’t good for anybody.
Pennsylvania’s leaders must come together to fix this funding issue soon and prevent these devastating impacts from rolling out.
We’ve failed families for the last 5 decades by leaving students with disabilities behind while forcing parents and teachers to make up missing resources.
It’s past time we fix it.
An honor to meet with a dozen of PA’s local emergency medical responders with the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians.
They are doing some of the toughest work imaginable, especially in our rural communities, and I’m grateful for their dedication and courage.
Just left the Senate after voting a hard NO on the “one big, beautiful bill.”
I will never support a bill that uses Medicare, Medicaid or SNAP cuts to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
DO: Deport actual MS-13 gang members here in our country.
DO NOT: Deport otherwise legal immigrants who are not MS-13.
His removal was a confirmed administrative error and, by court order, must be united with his family here in America by April 7.
I strenuously disagree with this.
These types of drugs have a profound impact on overall health and demonstrated the ability to save money—they cannot be just for the wealthy.
Withholding this from Americans on Medicare is NOT MAHA.
Attacking union membership is deeply un-American. I salute and fully support this move.
The union way of life is sacred.
SEE YOU IN COURT.
Workers should never have to choose between fighting for fair working conditions and feeding their families.
It’s past time we scrap that restriction.
www.fetterman.senate.gov/fetterman-in...
The Union Way of Life is sacred.
Public servants deserve the support and protection a union provides—and I’ll never support or understand why anybody would want to destroy them.
See yinz in court.
This is Pat + I just introduced a bill named after her brother and his wife:
The Dennis and Lois Krisfalusy Act.
Grateful to have Senator Cramer co-lead this bill with Senator McCormick’s support as we work to expand VA burial benefits for servicemembers + their families.
DO: Discuss on Signal your March Madness bracket.
DO NOT: Disclose on Signal the timing when American fighters will strike terrorist targets.
Lethality is incompatible with this sloppiness.
DO: Destroy Iran-backed Houthis.
DO NOT: Plan or discuss these plans on unsecured channels.
The most lethal U.S. military must also be the most secure.
Jackie Robinson is an American hero.
In the face of severe negativity and upheaval, he responded with dignity, restraint and poise.
Calling on the Department of Defense to restore Mr. Robinson’s deserved place in our nation’s history.
The United States government stays OPEN. 🇺🇸
My YES vote is *not* an endorsement of this deeply flawed CR.
My YES vote is 💯 about refusing to shut our government down.
I refuse to punish working families and plunge millions of Americans into chaos.
I will never, ever, ever, ever, ever vote to shut our government down.
Grateful to have had him as a professor at Kennedy School of Government.
Warm, authentic, kind and wise. To this day as a U.S. Senator, I still use his wisdom.
Pro-choice Republican, FROM WYOMING and unflinchingly real, he made a difference here and in that classroom.
The weeks of performative “resistance” from those in my party were limited to undignified antics.
Voting to shut the government down will punish millions or risk a recession.
I disagree with many points in the CR, but I will never vote to shut our government down.
Our F-350 and garage full of perfect strawberries 🍓 Gisele is distributing to folks right now.
Food insecurity is a real 🔴➕🔵 issue.
I’m fighting for SNAP, against cuts, but also fighting for common sense reforms.
Basic nutrition is a core responsibility.
The small handful of trans athletes in PA in a political maelstrom deserve an ally and I am one.
Depersonalized as “they/them” in a political ad, but are just schoolchildren.
Empty show votes or cruelty on social media aren’t part of a thoughtful, dignified solution.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | NO | NO | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (50-45) |
| 2026-07-13 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (46-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 185 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-50) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | S.J. Res. 196 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-52) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-44) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2026-06-23 | H. Con. Res. 86 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2026-06-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (67-30) |
| 2026-06-22 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | Accept House changes | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Agreed to (85-5) |
| 2026-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-39) |
| 2026-06-18 | H.R. 6644 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-8, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-06-17 | S. Res. 616 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.Res. 616 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (44-50) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-41) |
| 2026-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-39) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 18Next →