Laura Friedman headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 30
Born
December 3, 1966
Age 59
Phone
(202) 225-4176
Office
1517 Longworth House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 30

Laura Friedman

Laura Syril Friedman is an American politician and former film producer who is the member for California's 30th congressional district. A member of the Democratic Party, she previously represented California's 44th State Assembly district from 2016 to 2024.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 536
Yes41%
No58%
Present1%
Not Voting1%
Party align98%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 30

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Laura Friedman headshot
Laura Friedman
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 30
SoupScore
Laura's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 10 sponsored · 65 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I met with members of the LA Chapter of Chamber of Mothers, a nonprofit that advocates for policies that support mothers and families. We talked about how important it is to increase access to affordable childcare and improve maternal outcomes. I thank them for their efforts!
This isn’t a budget — it’s a blueprint for dismantling democracy and silencing accountability. → Undermines the courts. → Blocks AI oversight. → Rewards gun lobbyists. → Punishes student borrowers. → Attacks reproductive health. → Empowers political retaliation. (8/8)
Trump could strip nonprofits of tax-exempt status if he personally claims they support terrorism. That’s not policy — it’s political retaliation. And it threatens charities, humanitarian orgs, even dissent itself. (7/8)
Attacks on reproductive health — as always. Republicans want to block Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood. That means no federal dollars to Planned Parenthood for cancer screenings, pap tests, and STI treatment — especially in underserved communities. (6/8)
Student borrowers get punished — again. This bill wipes out flexible repayment plans and replaces them with just two rigid options. And if your school defrauds you or shuts down? The GOP wants to make it harder for you to get relief. Cruel and calculated. (5/8)
Gun safety? Out the window. The bill eliminates the $200 tax on gun silencers — in place since 1934. Silencers make it harder for law enforcement to locate shooters. There’s zero public safety benefit — just another handout to the NRA. (4/8)
A 10-year ban on regulating AI. But what does that mean? It means existing state protections, like California’s new law requiring transparency when AI is used to deny healthcare, become illegal. This isn’t about innovation — it’s about letting corporations deny care & dodge accountability. (3/8)
First up: One of the most dangerous provisions.   This bill strips courts of the power to enforce laws. Section 70302 of their budget bill would make it nearly impossible for courts to hold people in contempt — just as Trump keeps defying the court. (2/8)
🧵🚨Republicans are trying to jam through their budget in the dead of night — because they don’t want the public to see what’s in it. This bill isn’t just about cuts to Medicaid or tax breaks for billionaires — it’s packed with giveaways for donors and attacks on hardworking Americans. (1/8)
Members of Congress have a legal right — and a responsibility — to conduct oversight, whether that means questioning Cabinet officials or visiting ICE detention facilities. Rep. McIver was doing her job — upholding the law, demanding accountability, and defending the rights of people in custody.
Now the GOP is proposing massive cuts to SNAP, all so they can give every last cent to their billionaire friends. It is quite literally robbing food from struggling families to line the pockets of the rich.
This isn’t about budgeting. It’s about power. And it’s about protecting Trump from the rule of law. I’ll be voting against this bill — and speaking out against any attempt to weaken our courts.
The result: 1⃣ Judges would lose one of their only tools to make sure the law is followed. 2⃣ Agencies could be dismantled in violation of court rulings. 3⃣ Trump could keep defying the courts — with no consequences.
Courts routinely waive that bond — especially in public interest cases or when the government is the defendant. This clause would block enforcement in cases where a judge already ruled and didn’t require a bond. Even permanent injunctions could become meaningless.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
536 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageNONOFailed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingYESYESFailed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Divisions B and CYESYESPassed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Retaining Division AYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 780 (119th)Motion to DischargeYESYESPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-01-07H. Res. 977 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2026-01-06Call of the HousePRESENTPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 498 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 845 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 1366 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-18H.R. 4776 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 3492 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H.R. 6703 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H.R. 3616 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 64 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Con. Res. 61 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESFailed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-12-17H. Res. 953 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 3632 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-12-16H.R. 4371 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-12-16H. Res. 951 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 11Next →