Robert Garcia headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 42
Born
December 2, 1977
Age 48
Phone
(202) 225-7924
Office
109 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 42

Robert Garcia

Robert Julio Garcia is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 42nd congressional district since 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 28th mayor of Long Beach, California from 2014 to 2022. He was both the city's youngest and first elected openly LGBT mayor, as well as the first Latino to hold the office. He is the second person of color to be mayor of Long Beach, after Republican Eunice Sato, a Japanese American who served from 1980 to 1982. A former member of the Long Beach City Council, he was vice mayor from 2012 to 2014.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 568
Yes39%
No55%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 42

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Robert Garcia headshot
Robert Garcia
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 42
SoupScore
Robert's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 144 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

These fires are horrific. So grateful to all the first responders and all the personnel on the ground. There will be so much work to do in the future to support the families impacted.
This morning, I was honored to pay my respects to the late President Jimmy Carter. He was an incredible man who was a model for how we should live our lives. On behalf of the people I represent, I was able to say a prayer in the Rotunda today.
Former President Jimmy Carter in the Capitol Rotunda being honored.
We are all grateful for local firefighters and first responders from across the county and the state, who are working hard to protect our region. We are working with the Governor and President to ensure that we get all the federal aid we need. We need to make sure no one is left behind.
We are closely monitoring the LA fires and are greatly concerned and heartbroken by the devastation. I’ve also been in contact with Chief Buchanan and the Long Beach Fire Department who has deployed response units to Pacific Palisades and Pasadena.
Donald Trump is a danger to our country.
Garcia: He is a dangerous man and a dangerous person as president and as we think about the folks he wants to put in charge of our agencies: Kash Patel, Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard, Kristi Noem.. these are people that have no business involved in our national security apparatus..
Let’s be clear: January 6th was an insurrection and a blatant attack on our democracy, no matter how many times Trump & Marjorie Taylor Greene try to spin it. We should never stop calling out Trump for threatening the very foundation of our nation. (end thread)
Pardoning these people would mean letting violent criminals onto our streets and emboldening many more. It would threaten our national security and put our democracy at risk. We can't let that happen.
Inmates showed no remorse or regret. When they tried to shake my hand, I refused. Marjorie Taylor Greene instead gave them comfort and support. They celebrated and chanted, "Let's Go Brandon."
They were never "hostages," like Trump claims. And they are held in much better conditions than most inmates. They had tablets for entertainment and were separated from other inmates. They were being treated fairly.
Around 20 inmates were being held at the time, awaiting trial for a variety of violent crimes. Republican congress members treated the prisoners like celebrities, rather than people who attacked our capitol police and our very democracy. Many are now serving long sentences.
4 years ago a mob incited by Donald Trump attacked the Capitol to overturn the election. Now, Trump wants to pardon these insurrectionists. In 2023, I visited these prisoners at the DC jail on behalf of the Dems on the Oversight Committee. Marjorie Taylor Greene was there. Here's what happened: 🧵
Great to hear the Social Security Fairness Act was signed into law by POTUS, extending benefits to 3 million retirees. This includes millions of police officers, firefighters, and teachers across the country. I was proud to co-sponsor this legislation.
Why does Trump and Elon Musk want to eliminate the debt limit? Because they want to give huge tax breaks and cuts to themselves and their billionaire friends by redistributing hard earned income from working class folks. We can stop this.q
Bi-partisanship to House Republicans means they get everything they want - and we get nothing. They want to cut healthcare, the social safety net, and seperate familes. We need to fight like hell in Congress.
Like I have said before, working with Elon and his enablers will lead to the destruction of the social safety net. He wants to cut hard earned benefits so he can enrich his friends with tax cuts. We should NOT work with him.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
568 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-11H.R. 1156 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-11H. Res. 211 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 993 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 901 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 11 / 12Next →