Robert Garcia headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for California District 42
Born
December 2, 1977
Age 48
Phone
(202) 225-7924
Office
109 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Democrat|California District 42

Robert Garcia

Robert Julio Garcia is an American politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 42nd congressional district since 2023. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 28th mayor of Long Beach, California from 2014 to 2022. He was both the city's youngest and first elected openly LGBT mayor, as well as the first Latino to hold the office. He is the second person of color to be mayor of Long Beach, after Republican Eunice Sato, a Japanese American who served from 1980 to 1982. A former member of the Long Beach City Council, he was vice mayor from 2012 to 2014.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 536
Yes37%
No56%
Present0%
Not Voting6%
Party align98%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 42

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Robert Garcia headshot
Robert Garcia
U.S. RepresentativeDemocratCalifornia District 42
SoupScore
Robert's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 20 sponsored · 140 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

As a strong supporter of public transit, I’m leading a group of CA Congressmembers writing to Governor Newsom & Legislative Leaders supporting transit investments in the state budget. Good transit policy is good climate & housing policy. Read it here: bit.ly/TransitAid
Strong, stable, and sustainable transit networks are critical for California. Robust public transit supports access to affordable housing and walkable dense neighborhoods, reduces harmful pollution, and promotes social justice. All these are particularly crucial for underserved communities. We write in support of timely action to provide near-term public transportation operations funding in this year's state budget.
Transit systems have been severely affected by external shocks, ranging from operating and capital cost inflation and pandemic-related changes to ridership patterns. The Democratic Congress provided over $11 billion in support to California transit agencies over three COVID relief bills, which we championed. Now as those funds are exhausted, the Republican House makes additional federal transit assistance unlikely.
Therefore, without additional state funding to address these budget shortfalls, many agencies may soon be forced to implement drastic service cuts while laying….
workers and/or increasing fares. Such actions would risk sending these agencies into a negative spiral of reduced ridership and revenue, requiring further service cuts and still deeper ridership losses.
Major transit infrastructure projects throughout the state are gearing up to leverage major, once-in-a-generation federal funds made possible by the landmark Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Many of us advocated for these funds and worked diligently to ensure they would fund projects that benefit Californians. Without direct state aid to ensure that transit agency operations remain viable, we are deeply concerned that California transit networks will be unable to benefit from these historic investments.
Operational funding needs should not come at the expense of planned capital spending, or undermine past budget commitments. Near-term operations funding and flexibility from the state will help provide agencies with time to identify long-term, sustainable funding and operational models.
Reposted byRobert Garcia
The legal (& let’s be honest, psychiatric) systems are still learning about how trauma impacts individual behavior & scales up to influence trends in society. Valuing the experience of survivors is just and I hope our legal & psychiatric systems eventually catch up to ppl’s lived experiences.
A Louisiana bill would have created a pathway out of prison for domestic violence survivors who are incarcerated over acts that responded to the abuse. The proposal has now failed for this legislative session. Bolts reported on the bill in April.
Feels so good to be back in the LBC (Long Beach City for those that don’t know) only to remember that I have to fly out to Washington DC again tomorrow to fight House Republicans.
Reposted byRobert Garcia
I also love Star Trek. Deep Space Nine is my favorite Trek series and Sisko is my captain. But I love them all! Star Trek Picard delivered one of the best seasons of Trek ever, and finally gave Beverly her due. Live long and prosper.
Reposted byRobert Garcia
Yep, and in a working paper, my coauthor Sara Angevine and I find that LGB Congress Members sponsor more bills on behalf of trans folks than their straight counterparts.
What extremist conservatives are trying to do is seperate trans people from the LGBTQ+ community. It’s ok to be gay or lesbian they say but not trans. Fuck that. It’s all of us or none of us. Happy Pride.
Reposted byRobert Garcia
Hi! I am excited to be on this platform. My name is Matt, and I am a political scientist who studies legislative politics and representation for groups that do not offer a direct electoral reward. I have a strong normative commitment to political representation for all minoritized groups.
actually folks like Marjorie Taylor Greene say this all the time. They are targeting trans people. And attacks on drag queens is also a way to attack trans people. But yes they like to attack everyone.
What extremist conservatives are trying to do is seperate trans people from the LGBTQ+ community. It’s ok to be gay or lesbian they say but not trans. Fuck that. It’s all of us or none of us. Happy Pride.
Going to spend the day reviewing the details of this debt limit deal by the President and McCarthy. Crazy part is we never should have been held hostage by the House GOP in the first place. It’s a manufactured crisis.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
536 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-07-02H. Res. 566 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-27H. Res. 516 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 275 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-26H.R. 875 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-25H.R. 3944 (119th)Approve amendmentNONOAgreed to
2025-06-25H. Res. 519 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYESYESPassed
2025-06-24Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 530 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-24H. Res. 537 (119th)Kill the motionNOT_VOTINGYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3422 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 3394 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-23H.R. 1998 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 2056 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-12H.R. 4 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-12S. 331 (119th)Final passageNOYESPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-11H. Res. 499 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 884 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H.R. 2096 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-10H. Res. 489 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 481 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYESYESPassed
2025-06-09H. Res. 488 (119th)Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNONOPassed
2025-06-09H.R. 2035 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-06H.R. 2966 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2987 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-06-05H.R. 2931 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-04H.R. 2483 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-06-04H. Res. 458 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-06-03H.R. 1642 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H.R. 1 (119th)Send back to committeeYESYESFailed
2025-05-22S.J. Res. 31 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)End debate nowNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22H. Res. 436 (119th)Consideration of the ResolutionNONOPassed
2025-05-22Motion to AdjournYESYESFailed
2025-05-20S.J. Res. 13 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 11Next →