Happy National Trails Day, Colorado!
ENJOY THE GREAT OUTDOORS! 🌲🥾🏞️
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
John W. Hickenlooper
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 890
Yes33%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align95%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
John W. Hickenlooper
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
John W.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 36 sponsored · 291 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Thanks to Trump’s anti-science cuts, farmers are staring down a new crisis: screwworm infections in livestock.
Those cuts never should’ve happened. www.nytimes.com/2026/06/03/b...
Tina Peters is not a victim. She is a criminal. She shouldn’t receive one nickel of taxpayer money.
Tina Peters doesn’t deserve a government payout from Trump’s slush fund. We won’t stop fighting to prevent her and election criminals from getting a dime of your taxpayer dollars.
BREAKING: Senate Republicans just blocked our amendment to keep election criminals like Tina Peters from receiving taxpayer payouts from Trump’s slush fund.
Enough is enough. The American people deserve better.
Trump is too busy chasing vanity projects and building monuments to himself to care about working Americans.
The Trump administration is STILL separating families. It’s cruel, inhumane, and un-American. Not one more penny for ICE.
apnews.com/article/immi...
The DOJ needs a leader who believes in equal justice and the rule of law — not the rule of Trump.
Todd Blanche was the architect of the slush fund for Trump’s cronies, Tina Peters, and January 6 rioters.
He has no business leading the DOJ. Not now. Not ever.
There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it. Tina Peters is guilty as sin.
The Trump admin has made it crystal clear that they’d rather run with conspiracy theories than trusted science.
The American people deserve to hear directly from Trump’s NSF director nominee.
There should be a Senate hearing ASAP.
www.nytimes.com/2026/05/21/s...
Trump says he only hires the best people.
Yet his administration just hired a convicted Jan 6th rioter to work inside a Pentagon office that manages highly classified military operations.
If you attack the Capitol, you should NEVER get a government paycheck or a taxpayer payout.
Healthcare should be universal, accessible, and affordable. It’s something every American deserves, not something they have to earn.
www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/u...
I owned a brewpub.
Trust me: nobody walks into a restaurant excited to pay more.
Higher gas, grocery, and restaurant bills aren’t signs of confidence—they’re signs that this administration’s policies are hurting working families.
Bill Pulte has zero intelligence experience. He’s spent the bulk of his time in government targeting Trump’s enemies. As always, Trump is choosing loyalty over national security. That puts all of us at risk.
Parents shouldn’t have to worry about whether they can afford the healthcare their children need to survive. But that's what we heard from families in Denver.
We have fought these cuts since day one. We held up the Senate floor. We protested in the streets. We will keep fighting these blatantly retaliatory attacks. NCAR’s scientists and researchers do life-saving work that must endure. (2/2)
On a day when Tina Peters’ release has many Coloradans questioning whether the rule of law still matters, this ruling is a welcome reminder that courts can and should check abuses of power and political retaliation. (1/2)
coloradosun.com/2026/06/01/f...
June is Pride Month, Colorado!
As we get out and celebrate, let’s remember that we can’t stop fighting to make sure everyone in the LGBTQ+ community can live life without fear. 🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈
Trump's DOJ slush fund may be dead for now. But we must end it permanently.
Not a damn dime of your taxpayer dollars should go to Tina Peters, Jan. 6 rioters, or election criminals.
My reconciliation amendment will stop them. Soon, every senator will have to choose a side.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History890 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
890 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 18 / 18