Isn’t Trump supposed to be some legendary dealmaker? He’s now saying that he doesn’t want to pay TSA workers until MAGA Republicans somehow pass an impossible bill to make it harder for millions of Americans to vote. How does that make sense?
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Colorado
John W. Hickenlooper
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 772
Yes32%
No67%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
John W. Hickenlooper
U.S. SenatorDemocratColorado
SoupScore
John W.'s ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 32 sponsored · 228 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
Folks now have to choose between gas to get to work or food for their families. Coloradans are tired of paying the cost for this illegal war with Iran.
The U.S. should be a global leader in clean energy. Instead, this reckless decision puts us behind and will raise energy costs for working families at a time when they’re already sky-high.
Reposted bySenator John Hickenlooper
TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard aren't getting paid because Republicans have refused to fund them. Full stop.
Democrats have made MULTIPLE attempts to approve funding, and Republicans have rejected them.
Every. Single. Time.
The SAVE Act is only about saving this administration’s failing agenda. It would make it harder for MILLIONS of Americans to vote. I’m a NO.
Reposted bySenator John Hickenlooper
This is the only thing you need to know.
Democrats want to open TSA. Republicans are refusing because they want to attach ICE funding.
That’s why there are long lines. ICE.
The Trump admin openly admitted that they don’t care about you or the fact you’re paying the price for his illegal war in Iran.
The SAVE Act doesn’t *actually* help you save anything in Trump’s America.
Trump launched an illegal war in Iran and it’s costing Americans more and more with each day that passes. We should be focused on making life affordable for families here in the U.S.
Read more: coloradotimesrecorder.com/2026/03/excl...
This is HORRIFYING and should scare all of us. ICE is holding people at secret locations for days. We’re demanding immediate answers and a top-to-bottom overhaul of ICE.
Happy Eid al-Fitr to all who celebrate. We hope this past month of fasting and spiritual renewal was a blessed one. Eid Mubarak!
Just imagine: instead of an illegal war of choice in Iran, we could actually put Americans first – saving lives, lowering costs, and making life better in concrete ways.
99% of Colorado Republicans voted by mail in 2025. It’s safe, secure, and saves money.
The SAVE America Act would ban mail-in voting. We’re fighting to stop MAGA attacks on YOUR right to vote to make sure their bill has no chance of passing.
$200 BILLION?! Do you know what we could do with that kind of money?
Universal health care, free school meals for every child, free community college for every American. The list goes on.
I’m a NO on more money for Trump’s war with Iran.
We’ve now given Republicans multiple opportunities to pay TSA agents, FEMA, and our Coast Guard.
They’ve blocked it every single time.
(2/2)
A fair agreement is within reach. Both sides should stay at the table until the deal is done.
Collective bargaining is how working people win fair deals. That’s exactly what JBS workers are doing. They are the backbone of this company and deserve to share in its success.
(1/2)
coloradosun.com/2026/03/16/j...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History772 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
772 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16