Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 846
Yes34%
No62%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 46 sponsored · 258 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Every American should be able to go to school, the grocery store, or their place of worship without fear. My thoughts are with the victims of this horrific tragedy, their family and friends, and the entire Grand Blanc community.
Earlier this month, Navajo Nation District 14 held their first annual Veterans Stand Down. My staff was there to support and make sure our veterans know that we’re here to help. From VA claims to home loans to GI Bill benefits, my office is ready to serve New Mexico’s veterans.
Senator Heinrich staff member speaks to a room full of people at the Stand Down event.
Senator Heinrich staff member stands at a table with information materials outside the Stand Down event.
Some of our best memories are spent with our family and friends on public lands. They're where we gather, hunt, fish, hike, and bike. On this National Public Lands Day, get out and enjoy these national treasures we fought so hard to protect.
We need to re-evaluate our priorities as a country when tax cuts for billionaires are considered more important than making sure kids don’t go to bed hungry. I spoke w/SNAP participants and administrators about Trump’s Big, Bad Bill and the difficult road ahead for NM families.
Quality of life depends on the care people can access. If providers lose funding under Trump’s Big Bad Bill, clinics close, jobs vanish, and health care disappears. Grateful for today's conversation with students and health care providers at Mayfield High School’s Health Clinic.
Young woman in striped tank top speaks as Senator Martin Heinrich sits at the head of the table.
Young man in gray T-shirt speaks as a young woman seated next to him in a black T-shirt listens.
A young woman in a black T-shirt speaks.
A man in a blue jacket speaks as his colleague and Senator Martin Heinrich listen.
If Republicans have their way, thousands of New Mexicans will face increased health insurance costs. My constituents deserve a government funding bill that protects them from these unsustainable price hikes and I won’t settle for anything less.
Text graphic, light blue text on dark blue background. Letter from constituent reads: I am writing as your constituent to express my strong support for extending the health care tax credit. The potential expiration of this vital credit would have a direct and significant impact on my family's ability to afford health care.

If this credit expires, my effective health care costs would increase substantially, putting additional strain on my household budget at a time when my family, like many others, is already struggling with rising costs.

Health care expenses represent one of the largest financial burdens for American families. The healthcare tax credit helps make these essential services more affordable and accessible. Extending this tax credit would provide much-needed stability and predictability for families like mine who rely on it to help manage their health care costs.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
846 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-02-12H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (49-47)
2026-02-11H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2026-02-10S.J. Res. 95 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-51)
2026-02-10Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2026-02-09End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2026-02-05End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-46)
2026-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-47)
2026-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-02-04End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2026-02-04Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (58-39)
2026-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-39)
2026-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-45)
2026-02-03End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-44)
2026-02-03Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-40)
2026-02-02End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNONOBill Passed (71-29, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 4287)YESYESMotion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (58-42)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (58-42)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (67-33)
2026-01-30H.R. 7148 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (32-67)
2026-01-29H.R. 7148 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (45-55, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-27S. 3627 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-45, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (82-15)
2026-01-15H.R. 6938 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-14S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 98NONOPoint of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea)
2026-01-13S.J. Res. 84 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-01-12H.R. 6938 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required)
2026-01-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-40)
2026-01-08S.J. Res. 98 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98YESYESMotion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47)
2026-01-07S.J. Res. 86 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (43-50)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-48)
2026-01-06Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-47)
2026-01-05Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-35)
2025-12-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-42)
2025-12-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2025-12-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (58-36)
2025-12-18End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-12-18S. Res. 532 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-12-18S.J. Res. 82 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Defeated (50-50)
2025-12-17S. Res. 412 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (71-29)
2025-12-17End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (69-27)
2025-12-17Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (67-30)
2025-12-17End debateYESNOCloture Motion Agreed to (67-30)
2025-12-17S. 1071 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (77-20)
2025-12-15S. 1071 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (76-20, 3/5 majority required)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 4 / 17Next →