During women’s history month we should be celebrating all the progress and accomplishments we have made over history, not turning back the clock on reproductive rights.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico
Martin Heinrich
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes32%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 247 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
In New Mexico, when something is broken, you get to work and fix it. It is past time we protect the bump stock ban with a federal law.
www.koat.com/article/supr...
Today, SCOTUS will hear arguments on the bump stock ban.
In June, I intro'd bipartisan legislation with
Senator Collins & Senator Cortez Masto to keep this ban in place with a federal law.
I’m a firearm owner & sportsman. I believe in responsible gun ownership. Bump stocks aren't that.
What do books and public lands have in common? MAGA Republicans want to take away your access to both.
New Mexicans have a front row seat to our country’s broken immigration system. Every day, we see the real life consequences of our nonsensical system on families and communities.
The solutions won’t be easy to achieve, but difficult is not the same as impossible.
What does abortion access have to do with funding for our national parks? Nothing.
House Republicans are focused on political showmanship, not leadership. Well, shows over.
thehill.com/business/bud...
Great news: The American Climate Corps is growing.
Under this new program, more New Mexicans will have the opportunity to pursue emerging careers in their own communities.
Learn more: rb.gy/auf1i3
Earlier this month, Senate Republicans blocked our bipartisan investments in border security.
But for the Santa Teresa Border Patrol and Sunland Park Fire Department, they can’t and won’t turn away.
ICYMI: We are welcoming over $9 million in Infrastructure Law investments to our Albuquerque and Clovis airports — getting New Mexicans where they want to go and bringing in more visitors to power local economies.
ICYMI: @ENERGY has announced $63 million to ramp up heat pump manufacturing across the U.S. — a move that will lower costs and make New Mexico homes healthier.
A win for our climate and a win for your wallet.
rb.gy/rygfmg
I’m proud to welcome over $9 million from the Infrastructure Law for upgrades at the ABQ Sunport and Clovis Regional Airport. This investment and investments like these in our airports help keep our communities connected & grow our economic opportunities.
tinyurl.com/investNM
Santa Fe Community College’s work to welcome the families and experiences students bring with them is important – both for the parents and their kids.
www.santafenewmexican.com/news/educati...
For too long, Congress has been paralyzed when it comes to reducing mass shootings.
Last month, I was joined by law enforcement, firearm owners, & advocates to discuss my GOSAFE Act, a commonsense proposal designed to protect Americans from gun violence.
rb.gy/1bgfx4
The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act I helped negotiate is now delivering funding to places like the NM Central Regional Educational Cooperative and Future Focused Education to train students in peer-to-peer mental health first aid. This is exactly the type of thing we hoped to see.
This is a great opportunity to improve indoor air quality for New Mexico’s kids and an important part of what the Inflation Reduction Act is delivering. I strongly encourage all eligible entities to apply.
www.epa.gov/newsreleases...
Pleased to see the Biden Administration is heeding our calls to bring added transparency to how U.S. military aid is being used abroad.
We had a bipartisan deal to address border security and prevent things like this. I voted for it. Senate Republicans blocked it.
www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/...
Now that the physics of fusion are understood, it’s a matter of taking on the engineering challenge to unlock fusion’s limitless clean energy potential. I've started the Senate Fusion Caucus to ensure the investments and legislative attention we’re giving matches the potential.
The construction industry estimates that it will need 342,000 new folks to meet demand in 2024 alone. My PATH Act invests in the quality pre-apprenticeship programs that will help meet that demand, while also delivering careers in the community folks grew up in.
New Mexico will get over $1M from Bureau of Land Management this fiscal year for ecosystem restoration projects, from watershed restoration to campground improvements and native seed development. All funded through the Infrastructure Law we passed last Congress.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (91-7, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-07-22 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-21 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-36) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-34) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-31) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-43) |
| 2025-07-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (51-48) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-51) |
| 2025-07-17 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-50) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (47-52) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Send back to committee | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Recommit Rejected (48-51) |
| 2025-07-16 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (49-50) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | H.R. 4 (119th) | Motion to Discharge H.R. 4 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-47) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (69-30) |
| 2025-07-14 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-28) |
| 2025-07-14 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (46-42) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.