PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Martin Heinrich headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from New Mexico
Born
October 17, 1971
Age 54
Phone
(202) 224-5521
Office
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Mexico

Martin Heinrich

Martin Trevor Heinrich is an American politician serving as the senior United States senator from New Mexico, a seat he has held since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, Heinrich served as the U.S. representative from New Mexico's 1st congressional district from 2009 to 2013. He and fellow senator Ben Ray Luján are the co-deans of New Mexico's congressional delegation.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 789
Yes32%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting4%
Party align93%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @MartinHeinrichFacebookInstagramYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Martin Heinrich headshot
Martin Heinrich
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Mexico
SoupScore
Martin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 250 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 13(source)
The Valle de Oro allows kids to explore the natural heritage of our state right in their neighborhood. I was proud to help establish it as the first urban wildlife refuge in the Southwest—just 15 minutes from downtown Albuquerque. I highly recommend visiting soon.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 9(source)
Making Indigenous Peoples’ Day a federal holiday would uplift the strength and resilience of Tribal Nations and honor the significant contributions and diverse cultures of Native communities. I’m proud to lead this effort in the Senate.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 9(source)
This National Wildlife Refuge Week, I’m thinking about the fall migration of Sandhill Cranes on the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. One of my favorite times of year. Photo Credit: Bryan Holliday
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 8(source)
It’s National Wildlife Refuge Week. The National Wildlife Refuge System is the world’s largest system of lands and waters dedicated to wildlife conservation. All week I’ll be sharing some of my favorite spots in New Mexico. Stay tuned.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 2(source)
Indigenous Peoples’ Day is already a holiday in New Mexico. I'm introducing legislation to take that across the country — to recognize the history & honor the cultures & traditions of Tribal Nations & Indigenous peoples. Let’s get this passed.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govOct 1(source)
Keeping the government open today with responsible spending levels is a victory for the American people. But our job is not done. We must continue the work to pass responsible bipartisan government funding bills and provide support for our allies in Ukraine: My full statement:
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govSep 29(source)
Senator Dianne Feinstein was a trailblazer. She believed in a nation that put safety first. She leaves behind a legacy marked by the paths she paved for all of us to follow. It was a privilege to be her colleague. Julie and I have her family in our thoughts.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govSep 26(source)
If we want to connect all new, clean power resources incentivized by the Inflation Reduction Act to the grid, we need to build more transmission lines. Let’s finish the job. www.denverpost.com/2023/09/26/o...
Opinion: Without approval of major transmission projects, the West’s clean energy efforts will fal...
Simply put: if we want to connect all of the new clean power resources incentivized by the IRA to the grid, we need to build more transmission lines.
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govSep 23(source)
Our public lands are also uniquely American and we must do everything we can to preserve them for our children and all future generations to enjoy. This National Public Lands Day, I hope you get a chance to enjoy YOUR public lands. #NPLD
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govSep 22(source)
When we set out to make the Organ Mountains a National Monument, we wanted to deliver a long-term economic driver that was true to the values of the surrounding community. It’s working – and it’s surpassing even our most optimistic projections.   nmpoliticalreport.com/2023/09/18/r...
Report examines economic impact of Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument
Since President Barack Obama created the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument in 2014, visitation has tripled and the national monument has spurred economic growth in the Las Cruces area …
Senator Martin Heinrich@heinrich.senate.govSep 20(source)
As the first AmeriCorps alum in the Senate, I have been calling to create a Climate Corps for years. There will be so much work to do to solve climate change and build our clean energy future. Young Americans are eager to be the heroes in this story. www.whitehouse.gov/climatecorps/
American Climate Corps | The White House
President Biden is announcing a new initiative to train young people in high-demand skills for jobs in the clean energy economy. The American Climate Corps will put a new generation of Americans to wo...
← Newer postsPosts page 60Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
789 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-02-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (24-76)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Reed Amdt. No. 172)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Baldwin Amdt. No. 276)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Wyden Amdt. No. 1156)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 776)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (51-49)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Hickenlooper Amdt. No. 925)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Warner Amdt. No. 130)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-53, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Klobuchar Amdt. No. 494)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (48-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Schumer Amdt. No. 454)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (47-52, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-20—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-49)
2025-02-20—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-02-18S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-02-18—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-18—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (48-45)
2025-02-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2025-02-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-02-13—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (72-28)
2025-02-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-48)
2025-02-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-06—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 16Next →