I’m glad Minnesota is standing up to protect this precious place.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi
Cindy Hyde-Smith
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 903
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 43 sponsored · 207 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
At the end of the day, this is about a foreign company mining our metals, shipping them to China (almost certainly polluting the BWCA in the process) and then selling them back to us for their profit and our loss.
I strongly support Minnesota using all our regulatory powers to stop this mine. I also support the legislature taking action to stop this mine.
Minnesotans strongly support protecting the Boundary Waters. We are a mining state, but not this mine in this place. The Trump Administration and Republicans in Congress ignored the science and overturned protections for the Boundary Waters, but the fight continues here at home.
All this comes as the President dismisses and demeans these sailors’ sacrifices. It’s long past time for Congress to exert its war powers to rein in this war, but that will require Republicans to steel their spines and finally stand up to the President.
Men and women in uniform bear the brunt of the burden. 18 service members have died during this war, including one Minnesotan. 600 have been injured, many severely.
I’m grateful that the USS George Washington will relieve the Lincoln and its crew, but this serves as a stark warning about what happens when we stretch our military so thin.
The conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln do not make good on that promise. Food rationing. Sewage overflowing. No laundry. No hot water. Severe mental distress to the point some sailors have tried jumping overboard. All while maintaining 12–16-hour shifts in a combat zone.
We ask our sailors and their families to make incredible sacrifices. In return, we promise to move hell and high water to get them the support they need to carry out their operations.
Strip it down to the studs.
Masks covering their faces. Little or no visible identification. Unmarked vehicles. Guns. And as if that wasn’t enough, ICE is now getting electric-shock gloves straight out of a dystopian sci-fi novel.
As Americans struggle with rising costs and high gas prices, this is how Trump is choosing to spend taxpayer dollars. His priorities are clear.
www.washingtonpost.com/investigatio...
The White House normally gets $2.5 million a year for maintenance. Trump’s team has allocated $875 million.
That’s 350 years’ worth of the usual budget spent by a single administration.
My heart breaks for the firefighter who tragically lost their life near Ely while assigned to fight the Boundary Waters wildfires. I’m holding their family, friends, and all first responders in my heart as they grieve. Minnesota is eternally grateful for your service.
We’ve always known Todd Blanche won’t stand up to the President. The real question has been whether or not Republicans who know better would say enough is enough. His confirmation is maddeningly unsurprising.
Not to mention while all of this is happening, we pay the price at the pump.
These defensive missiles can’t just be restocked at a moment’s notice, considering they take at least two years to build. The President is putting our national security at risk for his reckless and unpopular war.
The Trump Administration is churning through our military’s limited supply of Patriot missiles faster than they can resupply, all for an unpopular war in the Middle East.
We’re going to fight back in the courts, and when we take back power, we need to be ready to pass my Stop Comstock Act to make sure no administration can abuse this zombie law ever again.
They grew quieter about their next moves after the fierce public backlash in the wake of the Dobbs decision, but we knew the Trump Administration wouldn’t rest until every woman in America was subject to an abortion ban, including in states where abortion rights are protected by state law.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History903 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
903 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-24 | H. Con. Res. 89 (119th) | Accept House changes | NO | NO | ✓ | Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (74-25, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-24 | S. 4668 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (77-23) |
| 2026-09-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2026-09-22 | S. 4668 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (70-21, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-45) |
| 2026-09-17 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2026-09-17 | S. 4668 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (77-22) |
| 2026-09-15 | S. 4668 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (74-24, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | H.R. 3633 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-09-15 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2026-09-14 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (47-46) |
| 2026-08-08 | S. 5271 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-49) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-08 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (61-32) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Final passage | YES | YES | ✓ | Bill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-08-07 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (32-64) |
| 2026-08-05 | S.J. Res. 187 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (48-50) |
| 2026-08-05 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | NOT_VOTING | YES | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2026-08-05 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-08-03 | H.R. 6500 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-30 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | Approve resolution | YES | YES | ✓ | Resolution Agreed to (50-47) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 181 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (49-50) |
| 2026-07-30 | S.J. Res. 199 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) |
| 2026-07-29 | S. Res. 817 (119th) | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2026-07-29 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12) |
| 2026-07-28 | H.R. 5334 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2026-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2026-07-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-43) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-44) |
| 2026-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-47) |
| 2026-07-23 | S.J. Res. 180 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180 | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-49) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-44) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (62-36) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-35) |
| 2026-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-46) |
| 2026-07-21 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-48) |
| 2026-07-20 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (43-40) |
| 2026-07-16 | S.J. Res. 198 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Rejected (46-50) |
| 2026-07-16 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-48) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2026-07-15 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2026-07-14 | S. 4784 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
Page 1 / 19Next →