Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
The transition to clean energy is going to happen. The only question is if the United States will lead the transition or follow behind China. Projects like this show that clean energy just makes good sense — even in cold states like ours.
Winona Area Public Schools secured $5.5 million in federal tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act for installing the energy-efficient system. Even better, the geo system will pay for itself with its energy savings.
The system regulates the school temperature by harnessing the earth’s natural heat as energy to keep the building warm in the winter + cool in the summer. It’s a cheaper way to heat/cool the school, doesn’t tie them to the ups and downs of a global oil/gas market and is clean, American-made energy.
Photo of Tina Smith receiving a tour of a geothermal dehumidification system.
Photo of a control panel.
Photo of a pipe with text that reads “CHILLED WATER RETURN SECONDARY”
Pipe with the text “HEATING WATER RETURN”
Two of Winona’s public elementary schools installed something great. It’s nerdy, so bear with me… ✨geothermal dehumidification systems✨
Photo of a Winona, Minnesota elementary school.
Even under the now-halted FDA policy, patients still had to talk to their provider before getting medication for an abortion. This just bans telehealth appointments because anti-choice politicians want to make it as inconvenient and difficult as possible to get mifepristone.
We should all be paying attention to what this means. Getting rid of Roe wasn’t the end game and they will go further. Anti choice extremists in state legislatures are teaming up with allies on the federal bench to take your freedom to control the course of your life.
Minnesota and countless other states have proven how we can safely decriminalize and regulate the cannabis industry. Long overdue for the federal government to take a page out of that playbook.
Reposted byTina Smith
Last week, the U.S. Senate passed a devastating bill that will undo protections for the Boundary Waters. Listen to this feature on NPR's All Things Considered featuring Explorers Amy and Dave Freemans and @smith.senate.gov discussing what this means for the wilderness. www.npr.org/2026/04/18/n...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-08-08S. 5271 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-49)
2026-08-08End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-49)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (61-32)
2026-08-07H.R. 6500 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07S. Res. 817 (119th)Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (32-64)
2026-08-05S.J. Res. 187 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-08-05S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-08-05Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-44)
2026-08-05End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-08-03H.R. 6500 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-30S. Res. 817 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESResolution Agreed to (50-47)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 181 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 199 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-07-29S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-07-29H.R. 5334 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12)
2026-07-28H.R. 5334 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-28Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-07-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (48-47)
2026-07-23S.J. Res. 180 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-49)
2026-07-22End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-14Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-07-13Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (46-44)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationNONOMotion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesNONOConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (85-5)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →