Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Mississippi
Born
May 10, 1959
Age 67
Phone
(202) 224-5054
Office
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Republican|Mississippi

Cindy Hyde-Smith

Voting Record — 890
Yes73%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align99%
Cross-party0%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Cindy Hyde-Smith headshot
Cindy Hyde-Smith
U.S. SenatorRepublicanMississippi
SoupScore
Cindy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 205 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted byTina Smith
One of the 100K+ people who lost their health insurance when Missouri slashed Medicaid in 2005 was a woman working a $6.70/hour McDonald’s job. Her ~$300/week pay put her over the stricter income limits despite supporting 3 kids. Now, congressional GOP are considering cuts that could be bigger...
If Congress cuts $880 billion from Medicaid, Missouri could face a yearly shortfall of $2 billion. An early 2000s budget gap of about $2.4 billion prompted the state to drop 100,000 people from Medicaid. kffhealthnews.org/news/article...
I’m prepared to fight with every tool at my disposal to stop this effort and to protect the Boundary Waters for future generations.
By including this language in their big budget bill, they have made it clear they don’t care about the science or the data, which shows unequivocally that this type of mining poses an unacceptable risk.
Republicans in Congress are trying to give a foreign conglomerate full permission to build a copper-nickel sulfide mine right on the doorstep of the Boundary Waters watershed and irreversibly pollute this pristine wilderness.
NEW LEGISLATION RISKS IRREVERSIBLE POLLUTION OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS 


House Republican legislation includes language to sell out the Boundary Waters to a foreign mining conglomerate
Energy Star has saved *half a trillion dollars* since it started, so this is only going to make you pay more for energy – and they know that. They know this will raise your costs, but it helps their buddies in the oil and gas industry, who donate big money to their campaigns.
Reposted byTina Smith
"I've been working on Social Security for 50 years. It's gone through wars and pandemics. It has never seen a threat like Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and Frank Bisignano, the nominee to be commissioner. There's never been a more important time to speak up." - Nancy Altman
Republicans want to cut disability programs to give billionaires more tax breaks. Not on our watch. Disability rights are human rights. Period.
BREAKING: Republicans just installed a self-proclaimed ‘DOGE person’ to be in charge of your Social Security. Friendly reminder that Elon Musk, head of DOGE, said Social Security is a Ponzi scheme that should be eliminated.   Every Dem voted no.
Reposted byTina Smith
President Trump’s tariff taxes are raising prices and hurting small businesses.   We joined Beth Benike, owner of Busy Baby and MN Small Business Person of the Year, and small business owners from across the country to call for these reckless tariffs to be reversed.
Today is Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives Awareness Day, a time for us to pay tribute and demand justice. It should serve as a call to action for all of us to address the epidemic of violence against Native communities, especially women.
Trump’s budget proposal cuts funding for police and fire departments, child care centers and social services for rural communities. He’s cutting basic needs just so he can give tax breaks and special treatment to his rich buddies. It’s a no from me.
If you or someone you know needs help, you can call the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800-656-HOPE(4673) or the StrongHearts Native Helpline at 844-7NATIVE (762-8483).
As Sexual Assault Awareness Month comes to a close, reminder that DOGE is busy gutting programs that help survivors—without explanation. People facing the highest rates of sexual violence — like Native communities – are paying the price.   This is not how we protect survivors.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05Motion (Motion to Waive Section 305(b)(2) of the CBA re: Cortez Masto Amdt. No. 1690)NONOMotion Rejected (49-50, 3/5 majority required)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-05H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (49-50)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (5-94)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (47-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (48-51)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (46-53)
2025-04-04H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Agreed to (51-48)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-48)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-04-03Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 26 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 26NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (15-83)
2025-04-03S.J. Res. 33 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 33NONOMotion to Discharge Rejected (15-82)
2025-04-03End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-04-03H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (53-42)
2025-04-02H.J. Res. 24 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-04-02S.J. Res. 37 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOJoint Resolution Passed (51-48)
2025-04-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-04-02End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-46)
2025-04-01Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-03-31End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (49-42)
2025-03-27Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-03-27End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-03-27S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (52-48)
2025-03-26S.J. Res. 18 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESJoint Resolution Passed (70-28)
2025-03-26H.J. Res. 25 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-26End debateNOT_VOTINGYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGYESNomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-26End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-26Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-03-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (56-44)
2025-03-25End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (56-44)
2025-03-25Confirm nomineeYESYESNomination Confirmed (53-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 15 / 18Next →