Kevin Hern headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for Oklahoma District 1
Born
December 4, 1961
Age 64
Phone
(202) 225-2211
Office
171 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|Oklahoma District 1

Kevin Hern

Voting Record — 613
Yes76%
No21%
Present0%
Not Voting3%
Party align97%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 1

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Kevin Hern headshot
Kevin Hern
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanOklahoma District 1
SoupScore
Kevin's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 18 sponsored · 30 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

This is a real issue, and as a pavement user with a disabled child I can confidently say illegally parked cars are not going to be knocked off the top spot for reasons why I have to do dangerous manoeuvres
This is extremely good, delivery robots are such a win. I worry about pavement clutter but they’re far less of an issue on that than lime bikes
You might have already seen them in some places, but a mass of autonomous pavement delivery robots could be coming after ministers signalled they are likely to support a change in the law formally allowing their use, prompting worry from campaigners. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Vastly more interested in “retro graphics, modern gameplay” than the other way round. “This plays just like it did in the 90s” no! I was there! That sucks!
How long before a big studio announces an earnest demake? Huge IP with 2003 visuals. Perhaps this has already happened. I just read books and tend my pumpkin patch.
net zero dads of bluesky, i am being asked if I have a preferred brand of battery. other than 'not tesla' is this the sort of thing one ought to have strong opinions on
if my builder had been allowed to spend £350 on installing a proper window unit rather than me spending £350 on getting a portable one, I would have a strictly better AC for the same cost
In practice, the spec is interpreted as "if you ask for AC, you are told to redesign the house so it doesn't need it". It's a catch 22: you're allowed to install active cooling only if you can prove you don't need to install active cooling
It's much much much more efficient and effective if it's built in, and I don't quite understand what the trade-off is here? Why is the portable unit preferable? It still costs money, still takes up space for 50 weeks, etc etc
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
613 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-10H.R. 495 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-06H. Res. 189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-06S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-05H. Res. 189 (119th)Kill the motionNONOFailed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 42 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-05H.J. Res. 61 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H. Res. 177 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-03-04H.R. 758 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-03-03H.R. 856 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 20 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 695 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H. Con. Res. 14 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 804 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-26H.R. 788 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H. Res. 161 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 818 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-25H.R. 832 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-24H.R. 825 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-13H.R. 35 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-12H.R. 77 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-11H. Res. 122 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 736 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-10H.R. 692 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-07H.R. 26 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-06H.R. 27 (119th)Approve amendmentNOT_VOTINGNOFailed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H. Res. 93 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-02-05H.R. 776 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-02-04H.R. 43 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 21 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-23H.R. 471 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-23H.R. 375 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2025-01-22S. 5 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 165 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H. Res. 53 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2025-01-22H.R. 187 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-21H.R. 186 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-16H.R. 30 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2025-01-15H.R. 33 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2025-01-15H.R. 144 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 12 / 13Next →