Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Voting Record — 616
Yes75%
No25%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 17 sponsored · 75 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

A perfect trifecta of morons welcomes David Ellison to X as Ellison announces that he will honor both Paramount and Warner Bros. by renaming the new company Skydance.
Moron #1: Spencer Pratt. Moron #2: Some blowhard named "CyberPunkFightClub" saying he hopes Skydance movies won't have "woke BS." Moron #3: A guy named "Kirk Reagan, Starship Captain"--JESUS H. CHRIST!--asking for Star Trek to rebooted without "social justice agendas...Get back to thought provoking space adventure."
[Deep breath} When you predict Oscar nominations for a movie based on pedigree without seeing it, you are volunteering to aid in a publicity system that favors movies the campaigns for which are already well funded, and by doing so further disadvantaging films whose primary merit is their quality.
But the movie complicates the path to its finish line admirably, and the four actors keep it idiosyncratic and specific all the way through. This will be on Netflix and honestly, I think that'll be a great way to watch it.
Day 7 of #NYFF64: Lee Chang-Dong's Possible Love goes deep and long in its portrait of two contemporary South Korean couples, one wealthy, the other pulverized by what people here like to call late capitalism and its cruel ramifications. Is their unlikely friendship going to end badly? Well, yeah. >
The movie has an MVP who it would be wrong to identify but we'll get there after it's been open for a bit. (Don't reply with a name; be cool!) For me, against stiff competition, this was the highlight of #NYFF64 so far.
Just came from Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim's You Can See Everything, and, well, uh...OH MY GOD. You will do yourselves a huge kindness if you read nothing more before you see it--with as big an audience as possible so that you can ride the waves of laughs, suspense, shock, and joy as one.
...it's both gentle and extremely tough. One reason we go to movies is to see timeless things explored in completely new ways. The last third of Everytime does that, with a daring and even alienating leap into something I won't spoil. I left knowing I had seen something I'd never seen before.
Day 6 of #NYFF64: I was flat-out stunned by Sandra Wollner's Everytime (this year's German Oscar submission). In a way that's slightly reminiscent of Aftersun (same cinematographer), it explores the disorientation and non-linearity of grief after a devastating family loss. It doesn't wring tears...>
There was a very interesting moment during a group cast interview when Sinbad got pissed off and broke through with some truth. It's in the story, but if I had been a more experienced writer, I think I would have known enough to make more of it. Anyway, Different World fans, I hope you enjoy it.
Since A Different World has been rebooted, I'm going to share something from deep, deep in the archives at the risk of embarrassment. 35 years ago, Entertainment Weekly decided to do a cover story on the original series. They sent...me. (File that under "Normal for 1991, not for 2026.") >
I was just typing something about the new Japanese movie All of a Sudden, and a little bubble popped up next to it saying "Concision: 'Suddenly' would be a better way to say this." If I could make the program that did this scream and beg for mercy, I would do it and sleep just fine tonight.
These people are utter garbage.
If you want to really know how the outrage machine gets fired up: 1. Schmitt plans to drop “bombshell” on Smith 2. Someone plants story that Schmitt is a Vance VP contender to run same day 3. Right-wing Twittersphere gets talking points 4. Schmitt steps in it 5. Scheduled tweets go out anyway
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
616 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-02-04H.J. Res. 142 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-04H.R. 4090 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-02-03H.R. 7148 (119th)Accept Senate changesYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-03H. Res. 1032 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-03H.R. 3123 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-02-02H.R. 980 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-22H. Con. Res. 68 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Failed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-22H.R. 6359 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Final passageNOYES✕Passed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-01-22H.R. 7148 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-01-22H.R. 7147 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2026-01-22H. Res. 1014 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-21H.J. Res. 140 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-21H.R. 6945 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-21H. Res. 1009 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-21H.R. 5764 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-20H.R. 5763 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-15H.R. 2988 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Agreed to
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-01-14H.R. 7006 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYES✓Failed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-14H. Res. 992 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-13H.R. 4593 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-13H.R. 2312 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-13H.R. 2270 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Failed
2026-01-13H.R. 2262 (119th)Send back to committeeNONO✓Failed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-13H. Res. 988 (119th)End debate nowYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-13H.R. 6504 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYES✕Passed
2026-01-13H.R. 6500 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYES✕Passed
2026-01-12H.R. 2683 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYES✕Passed
2026-01-09H.R. 5184 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed
2026-01-08H.R. 1834 (119th)Final passageNONO✓Passed
2026-01-08H. Res. 780 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Passed
2026-01-08H.R. 131 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingNONO✓Failed
2026-01-08H.R. 504 (119th)Passage, Objections of the President To The Contrary NotwithstandingNONO✓Failed
2026-01-08H.R. 6938 (119th)Final passageYESYES✓Passed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 5 / 13Next →