Mark Harris headshot
At a Glance
Seat
Representative for North Carolina District 8
Born
April 24, 1966
Age 60
Phone
(202) 225-1976
Office
126 Cannon House Office Building, Washington 20515
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Representative|Republican|North Carolina District 8

Mark Harris

Mark Everette Harris is an American Baptist pastor and politician from North Carolina. A member of the Republican Party, he is the U.S. representative for North Carolina's 8th congressional district since 2025.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 497
Yes75%
No24%
Present0%
Not Voting0%
Party align93%
Cross-party1%
SoupScore
District Map

Congressional District 8

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Mark Harris headshot
Mark Harris
U.S. RepresentativeRepublicanNorth Carolina District 8
SoupScore
Mark's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 14 sponsored · 69 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Yeah, I'm going to be optimistic. No time or space for doomerism right now. Tell it to your shrink or your friends or your cat, or scream it into your coffee mug, but keep it out of my yard. Thanks.
I have hated 50. Just hated it. I'm starting to feel that the only season that would interest me at this point is one stocked entirely with players who have never watched the show.
A bit of cheerleading for you: Even some gerrymandered seats are not 100% certain to go the way the GOP wants in a wave election. In the last five midterm elections, the incumbent's party lost 9, 13, 30, 40, and 63 seats. Do you know how many turnovers Democrats need to flip the House? Three.
More than anything, Republicans want Democrats to start to believe that it's hopeless so they won't bother to turn out. But the truth is that even the Virginia decision is not enough to prevent Democrats from taking the House if we have a wave election. But we have to have a wave election.
More than anything, Republicans want Democrats to start to believe that it's hopeless so they won't bother to turn out. But the truth is that even the Virginia decision is not enough to prevent Democrats from taking the House if we have a wave election. But we have to have a wave election.
P.S. It's notable how much more supple, adaptable, and alert to the times SVU has proven to be. (Huge credit, obv., to Mariska Hargitay.) It's wrapping its best season in a few years, with an interesting mix of long- and short-term storylines and strong plotting (except for the vanishing of Ice-T).
And it's not a case of L&O being set in its old ways, because its old ways were often great. Watch early eps: the plotlines, writing, and politics were dense, idiosyncratic, often surprising, and the guest casts were the cream of NY theater instead of whoever they can lowball to keep costs down.
You can't have a cop show in 2026 where the cops still gather around the one computer in the precinct and say "See if you can zoom in" or where the police captain says thoughtfully to her officers, "Talk to witnesses and try to find out who did this." It's a disservice to good actors and to viewers.
As a diehard Law & Order fan who has seen every episode, I hope that it gets renewed for another season. But the truth is that the next truly interesting era of the show will probably not happen until Dick Wolf is out of the picture. It needs a from-the-ground-up rethink.
I did not! This one is so old that I was still a staff writer in the TV section. I did work with Ryan briefly when I became an editor--I think he contributed features to EW as late as 1994. The main thing I remember--I think I'm right about this--is that AB was pissed off when it ran.
It is my sad duty to give half of Bluesky a stroke by sharing this Hollywood Reporter headline and subhead. Please note in particular the two words following "unlikely." If. You. Dare.
Headline and subhead from The Hollywood Reporter: 
EZRA KLEIN, SO HOT RIGHT NOW
Thanks to his best-selling book and blockbuster podcast, the liberal wonk of the Obama years has become one of NYT's brightest stars--and an unlikely thirst trap. But is his deep-thinking approach suited to our clickbait world?
I think Fonda herself made the difference clearest when she said something on the order of, if you marry Ted Turner, your entire job is being Ted Turner's wife.
I love all these people who are inveighing against the 24-hour news cycle and its evils. You know you're on Bluesky, right? Don't pretend this is anything but a group home for those who are addicted to the drip-drip-drip of information and discourse.
BTW, Fonda writes with candor and deep thoughtfulness about what she calls her "subsumation" to Turner ("the only person I know who has had to apologize more than I have") in her 2005 autobiography My Life So Far, which I can't recommend highly enough.
Ted Turner had an instinct for mergers, a lot of charm, an inhuman level of self-confidence, AND a wildly overinflated sense of what he could pull off, and if I were to pick a single deal that represented all of those qualities, it would be "I think I can turn Jane Fonda into a trophy wife."
Here's a good thread (by someone who's mad at my take on Ted Turner) listing some of his positive achievements. There is no arguing with the fact that he cared deeply about (certain aspects of) America and the world in a way that his descendants, whose sole allegiance is to wealth, do not.
My hubs and I both worked at Turner, in different capacities, for many years. This post greatly minimizes his accomplishments. 1. Bought Channel 17 and then the rights to the Atlanta Braves. In 1976, beamed Channel 17’s signal up to a satellite to become cable TV’s first superstation.
Posts page 1Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
497 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-04-23H.R. 5587 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 6387 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H.R. 4690 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1182 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-22H. Res. 1189 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-21S. 1020 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 2493 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-21H.R. 5201 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 5200 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-20H.R. 1681 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve resolutionNOYESFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)Approve amendmentYESYESFailed
2026-04-17H. Res. 1175 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 1156 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 1689 (119th)Final passageNONOPassed
2026-04-16H. Res. 965 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6398 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-16H.R. 6409 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-04-16H. Con. Res. 40 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOFailed
2026-04-15H. Res. 965 (119th)Motion to DischargeNONOPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-04-15H. Res. 1174 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 7613 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-04-14H.R. 1011 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-28H. Res. 1142 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-28Motion to AdjournYESYESPassed
2026-03-27H.R. 7084 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-26H.R. 8029 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-26H. Res. 1128 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H.R. 5103 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-25H. Res. 1131 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-24H.R. 6422 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-19H.R. 4638 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.J. Res. 139 (119th)Fast-track passageYESYESFailed
2026-03-18H.R. 1958 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Final passageYESYESPassed
2026-03-18H.R. 556 (119th)Send back to committeeNONOFailed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYESPassed
2026-03-17H. Res. 1115 (119th)End debate nowYESYESPassed
2026-03-17S. 3971 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed
2026-03-17H.R. 4294 (119th)Fast-track passageNOYESPassed

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 10Next →