Amy Klobuchar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
May 25, 1960
Age 66
Phone
(202) 224-3244
Office
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Amy Klobuchar

Voting Record — 903
Yes35%
No63%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Amy Klobuchar headshot
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 96 sponsored · 471 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

I met with Wright County Commissioners Darek Vetsch and Nadine Schoen and County Administrator Greg Kryzer to discuss road projects along I-94 and Highway 24.    These improvements mean less congestion and safer roads for Minnesotans.
From bulldozing our rights to upending our economy, ICE needs to get out of Minnesota. Local businesses—from restaurants to home construction—are being hurt by ICE's surge in our state.
GOOD NEWS 🚨The House is set to vote to reverse the President’s tariffs on our neighbors in Canada and send Trump a clear bipartisan message: he can’t unilaterally wage a trade war against one of our strongest allies. My bill with Sen Kaine and Rand Paul already passed the Senate 50-46.
The House is set to reject Trump’s Canada tariffs today after Mike Johnson failed to contain GOP unrest over the trade war.
Minnesotans came together at Lake of the Isles for the ICE Out for Good vigil—sharing poetry, music, and snow sculptures to honor the lives of Alex and Renee.   In Minnesota, we melt ice every spring – we can melt away fear & division too.    www.mprnews.org/story/2026/0...
I met with students from some of Minnesota’s Tribal colleges. Our Tribal colleges are educating the next generation, preserving language and culture, and opening doors to in-demand careers.
My condolences to Jeff Johnson and his entire family for the loss of their daughter on Saturday night. John and I are praying for all those who loved her during this unimaginably difficult time.
Great discussion with Minnesota ag leaders.    Farmers are struggling because of the administration’s tariffs: lost export markets, higher input costs and uncertainty. We need to end the tariff chaos to keep family farms strong and put year-round E-15 in place.
It took the outcry of a nation to bring 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father back to Minnesota from an ICE detention facility, and now the Trump administration is trying to fast-track their deportations. The cruelty of this administration has no limits.
President Trump calls his tariffs an “economic miracle” but the facts tell a different story.    Inflation is up and families are still paying more at the checkout counter. We need real solutions for working families – not cherry-picked numbers.
I joined a bipartisan group of senators in introducing a resolution honoring Team USA's Olympic & Paralympic athletes as the Milano Cortina Winter Games begin. Minnesota is well represented having the 2nd-most Winter Olympians of any  state.
I had the opportunity to speak with the Speaker of Ukraine's parliament Ruslan Stefanchuk about our shared commitment to democracy and freedom. We discussed the bipartisan legislation I led, which passed in December, to help Ukraine track down children kidnapped by Russia.
Minnesota’s own Jessie Diggins said it best heading into the Winter Olympics: ‘I'm racing for an American people who stand for love, for acceptance, for compassion, honesty and respect for others. I do not stand for hate or violence or discrimination.’    www.npr.org/2026/02/03/n...
I met with online safety advocates, including Bridgette Norring—who lost her son Devin to fentanyl bought on social media—and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, to discuss repealing Section 230.    Current law shields platforms from responsibility for harms like drug sales to  kids online.
I have long worked to support local law enforcement and was honored to receive the Major County Sheriffs of America’s Legislator of the Year award.    Our sheriffs play a critical role in keeping our communities safe and upholding the rule of law.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
903 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-43)
2025-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-44)
2025-06-10—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45)
2025-06-10—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-41)
2025-06-09—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-06-09—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-41)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43)
2025-06-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-43)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (57-38)
2025-06-04—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (48-46)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-04—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37)
2025-06-04—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (72-26)
2025-06-03—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-36)
2025-06-03—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-37)
2025-06-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-06-02—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (49-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 89 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-45)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 87 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-22H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-44)
2025-05-21H.J. Res. 88 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONO✓Point of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Point of Order S.J.Res. 55NONO✓Point of Order Sustained (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Motion to Adjourn S.J.Res. 55YESYES✓Motion to Adjourn Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Ten Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-52)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Fifteen Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Thirty Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for 60 Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (45-51)
2025-05-21—Motion (Motion to Recess for Ninety Minutes)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (46-51)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionNONO✓Motion to Table Agreed to (51-46)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Kill the motionYESYES✓Motion to Table Failed (46-52)
2025-05-21S.J. Res. 55 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46)
2025-05-21S. 1582 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (69-31)
2025-05-19S. 1582 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (66-32, 3/5 majority required)
2025-05-19—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-05-19—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-05-15S. Res. 195 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.Res. 195YESYES✓Motion to Discharge Rejected (45-50)
2025-05-15—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-05-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-05-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-05-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-05-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-43)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 13 / 19Next →