PolicySoupstir the potALPHA

Amy Klobuchar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
May 25, 1960
Age 65
Phone
(202) 224-3244
Office
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Amy Klobuchar

Amy Jean Klobuchar is an American politician and lawyer serving as the senior United States senator from Minnesota, a seat she has held since 2007. A member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), Minnesota's affiliate of the Democratic Party, she previously served as the county attorney of Hennepin County, Minnesota.

Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 776
Yes33%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
Official siteBlueskyX @SenAmyKlobucharYouTube
External Resources
WikipediaBallotpediaVoteSmartGovTrackOpenSecrets
Amy Klobuchar headshot
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 87 sponsored · 403 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Senator Mark Warner@markwarner.bsky.socialNov 3(source)
When talking about Democrats, Trump said, “If they don’t vote, it’s their problem.” If Trump doesn’t sit down with Democrats and negotiate to reopen the government, he will be the problem for millions of Americans losing their food aid and paying double for health care.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Senator Mazie K. Hirono@hirono.senate.govNov 3(source)
Republicans slashed SNAP and Medicaid in their Big Ugly Bill so they could hand out tax breaks to the wealthiest people in our country, but now refuse to extend health care tax credits so working Americans can afford their health care. Talk about having the wrong priorities.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 4(source)
The administration is hiding who is paying for Trump’s gilded ballroom.   And many of the big donors giving Trump money have a reason to … they want the administration’s signoff on their deals.   This is corruption, plain and simple.
Ken Vogel
@kenvogel.bsky.social
Open post ↗
NEW: The WH did not disclose several donors to the ballroom who have business before Trump: ▶️Jeff Yass, investor in TikTok parent company: $2.5m+ to ballroom ▶️BlackRock, trying to buy Panama Canal ports: $2.5m+ ▶️Extremity Care, Medicare reimbursement issues: $2.5m ▶️Vantive, Medicare reimbursement
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 3(source)
I met Christi, a small business owner from Eagan whose employee, a cancer survivor, is seeing his family’s health costs rise by $400 a month. Christi helps pay for his premiums, doing everything she can to keep him insured. This is who we’re fighting for.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 3(source)
The courts have ordered the administration to use its contingency fund for SNAP—and have made clear it can use its transfer authorities to fully fund SNAP. It is not enough to do the bare minimum—they should do everything they can to ensure Americans put food on the table.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 2(source)
AI presents many opportunities for innovation, but there are risks that we need to address. We need common-sense rules of the road like our bipartisan NO FAKES Act, which is even supported by Google, to protect people’s voice and image from being used in unauthorized deepfakes.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 2(source)
Christi runs a small business in Eagan, MN and helps pay her employee's premiums. Now those costs are skyrocketing because Congressional Republicans refuse to extend the health care tax credits. We must prevent these price hikes.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 1(source)
Today enrollment for health insurance opens and millions of Americans including breast cancer survivors will see their premiums double. The President needs to come to the table and work with us to extend the health care tax credits so Americans don’t lose their care.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govNov 1(source)
🚨 A second judge grants a temporary restraining order requiring USDA to provide SNAP using contingency funding “as soon as possible.” Trump has no excuse: He cannot take food assistance away from families in need.
Senator Amy Klobuchar
@klobuchar.senate.gov
Open post ↗
GOOD NEWS: A judge ruled the administration is required by law to use emergency funding to provide food assistance to families in need. Trump has no excuse to withhold food assistance. If the admin does not issue SNAP, it is purely a cruel political decision, not a legal one.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govOct 31(source)
GOOD NEWS: A judge ruled the administration is required by law to use emergency funding to provide food assistance to families in need. Trump has no excuse to withhold food assistance. If the admin does not issue SNAP, it is purely a cruel political decision, not a legal one.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govOct 31(source)
Since the Administration is refusing to help Americans in need, we are standing by to vote for bills to ensure continued access to food assistance. Why won’t Republicans call up these bills for a vote? They'd rather let kids go hungry than risk a vote on the Epstein files.
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govOct 30(source)
NEWS: The Senate is standing up for the Constitution and taking on Trump’s chaotic tariffs. This week we’ve passed bills to: Today: Overturn Trump’s across-the-board tariffs Yesterday: Overturn the tariffs on Canada Tuesday: Overturn the tariffs on Brazil
Senator Amy Klobuchar@klobuchar.senate.govOct 30(source)
Tens of millions of Americans, including about 4 million Texans, are standing on the edge of a health care premium cliff. Without the health care tax credits, the average annual premium for these Texas families will more than double. Senate Democrats are fighting to stop that.
← Newer postsPosts page 27Older posts →
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
776 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-03-14—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (59-40)
2025-03-14—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-39)
2025-03-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (54-45)
2025-03-13S. 331 (119th)End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (84-15, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-45)
2025-03-13—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-03-13—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (57-41)
2025-03-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-03-12—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-46)
2025-03-12—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-03-11—Confirm nomineeYESYES✓Nomination Confirmed (78-19)
2025-03-11—End debateYESYES✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (76-20)
2025-03-11—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-46)
2025-03-11—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-10—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (67-32)
2025-03-06S. 331 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYES✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-12, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-06—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-30)
2025-03-06—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (53-43)
2025-03-06—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43)
2025-03-05S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (51-47)
2025-03-05—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-03-05—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 28 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (50-47)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (70-27)
2025-03-04S.J. Res. 3 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (70-28)
2025-03-03S. 9 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONO✓Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (51-45, 3/5 majority required)
2025-03-03—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (51-45)
2025-02-27—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-27H.J. Res. 35 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 12 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47)
2025-02-26S.J. Res. 10 (119th)Approve resolutionYESYES✓Joint Resolution Defeated (47-52)
2025-02-26—Confirm nomineeNONO✓Nomination Confirmed (56-43)
2025-02-25—Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Approve resolutionNONO✓Joint Resolution Passed (54-44)
2025-02-25S.J. Res. 11 (119th)Begin considerationNONO✓Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-42)
2025-02-25—Confirm nomineeYESNO✕↔Nomination Confirmed (66-28)
2025-02-24—End debateNONO✓Cloture Motion Agreed to (54-43)
2025-02-24—End debateYESNO✕↔Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Accept House changesNONO✓Concurrent Resolution Agreed to (52-48)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Agreed to (53-47)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (49-51)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (48-52)
2025-02-21—Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Van Hollen Amdt. No. 233)YESYES✓Motion Rejected (49-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYES✓Amendment Rejected (47-53)
2025-02-21S. Con. Res. 7 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONO✓Amendment Rejected (24-76)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 14 / 16Next →