NEWS: The Senate is standing up for the Constitution and taking on Trump’s chaotic tariffs.
This week we’ve passed bills to:
Today: Overturn Trump’s across-the-board tariffs
Yesterday: Overturn the tariffs on Canada
Tuesday: Overturn the tariffs on Brazil
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 783
Yes34%
No65%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 87 sponsored · 409 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This is an actual headline in the New York Times.
Meanwhile he’s cutting food for hungry kids and letting health premiums skyrocket at home. But oh the crown! 👑
Tens of millions of Americans, including about 4 million Texans, are standing on the edge of a health care premium cliff.
Without the health care tax credits, the average annual premium for these Texas families will more than double.
Senate Democrats are fighting to stop that.
Gutting health care coverage then destroying people's credit when they can't pay their medical bills... that's a choice.
I went to the Senate floor to make the case for the resolution I lead with Senator Kaine to overturn the punishing Canadian tariffs.
No way to treat an ally 🇨🇦 and no way to treat the American people. It passed the Senate! The House needs to come back and act.
Trump’s tariffs are a nearly $2,000 tax on American families. The Senate is taking action by repealing his corrupt tariffs on Brazil, and we will vote to stop his tariffs on Canada next.
The House needs to return to work and reverse these tariff taxes and actually lower costs.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
New data confirms what American families already know: Trump’s tariffs are contributing to record high prices for everyday essentials.
President Trump should stop starting trade wars that hurt American consumers.
www.wsj.com/economy/cons...
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
You are reading that right. Some Wisconsinites could pay $30,000 more next year for the exact same health insurance.
My Republican colleagues still have a chance to stop this – the time to act is now.
Early detection of breast cancer has a strong influence on five-year survival rates: cases detected early have a nearly 99% chance of survival.
@wassermanschultz.house.gov joined me to discuss our bipartisan bill to arm women with information they need to take charge of their health.
NEWS: The Senate voted to stand up to Trump and end his corrupt tariffs on Brazil. These tariffs are driving up prices for American families in order to support his political allies.
I voted yes to lower costs and uphold the rule of law.
It’s Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Without health care, Americans won’t get the screenings they need to detect cancer early and get the care they need.
We should be extending the health care tax credits—not letting premiums double for tens of millions of Americans.
Jamaica faces a dangerous and destructive hurricane making landfall today. Our hearts are with all those impacted including Jamaican Americans who are praying for their friends and family members in Jamaica.🇯🇲
www.nytimes.com/live/2025/10...
First the administration cut food assistance for Americans in need.
Now they’re refusing to use emergency funds for food assistance—even though their now-deleted shutdown plan said they could.
They have the funding to keep families from going hungry. There’s no excuse.
A couple in their 60s in Hibbing could see their monthly premiums increase from about $200 to $475. That’s an increase of more than $3,000 a year!
With prices already rising, that means families will have to choose between paying for essentials or health care.
In northern MN, some people will see their health insurance premiums double if Congressional Republicans refuse to act.
In Bemidji, a family of four could see their monthly premiums increase more than 140% — from less than $200 to more than $470.
Let’s be clear: the administration is choosing not to tap emergency funds available to provide critical food assistance for families in need.
Their own shutdown plan — which they recently deleted — confirmed they could. Read it for yourself:
One thing that will be especially spooky this Halloween?
Candy prices 👻
They’re up more than 10% since last year as tariffs increase the cost of everything from chocolate to packaging.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
With Trump overseas and the Republican House on vacation, here’s how Republicans’ health insurance sticker shock is landing in RI: this family of 3 would see their monthly premium spike $547.
Time for Rs to get serious about fixing this.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Families are fighting to afford groceries and gas. Inflation’s up, energy costs are through the roof. Donald Trump’s biggest concern? Knocking down the White House’s historic east wing to build a ballroom for himself.
Incredible story about the bravery and quick thinking of first responders and dispatchers that saved lives at Annunciation. We are deeply grateful for their heroic actions.
www.startribune.com/the-heroes-o...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History783 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
783 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 16 / 16