Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Lauren's daughter Harper just finished her treatments for pediatric cancer. But the Medicaid cuts in Trump's budget law could put Harper and other Georgia kids' care at risk.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 774
Yes33%
No66%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 87 sponsored · 403 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
A family of four in Elk River could see their monthly premiums increase from $1,000 to $1,600. That’s an increase of $7,200 a year.
That means families have to choose between paying for groceries, housing, and other essentials—or losing their health care.
In central MN, some people will see their health insurance premiums more than double if Congressional Republicans refuse to extend the health care tax credit.
In St. Cloud, a couple in their 60s could see their monthly premiums increase from less than $800 to almost $2,000.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Speaker Johnson: What are you hiding?
You’re more interested in covering up what happened at the Epstein Mansion than protecting Americans’ health care.
Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, especially in rural communities.
If Congressional Republicans refuse to address skyrocketing health care costs, millions of small business owners and employees will see their premiums double.
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Farmers and ranchers would be among those hit the hardest by skyrocketing premiums if Republicans allow ACA health care tax credits to expire.
Republicans must come to the table to find a way forward.
Our ag producers and their families cannot afford to live without this lifeline.
I joined the democratic women’s caucus call on House Republicans to do their jobs and bring down the cost of health care.
A family of four in Mankato could see their monthly premiums increase from $1,165 to $2,400.
That means less money for groceries, housing, and other expenses—or losing their health care altogether.
In southern MN, some families will see their health insurance premiums more than double if Congressional Republicans refuse to extend the health care tax credit.
In Rochester, an older couple could see their monthly premiums increase from less than $700 to more than $3,000.
I met Rep.-Elect Adelita Grijalva yesterday and she’s ready to serve. Avoiding a vote on the Epstein files is not an excuse for delaying her swearing in.
She’s here in DC. Where are House Republicans?
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
Republicans are imperiling lifesaving care with their cuts to Medicaid & ACA tax credits. Thousands in CT will soon lack affordable coverage. Democrats are trying to save it—at the same time as the government reopens.
AI-generated news articles are drowning out articles written by actual humans. We need clear rules of the road for AI to prevent disinformation and to ensure journalists are compensated for their work.
Republicans are more likely to get health insurance through the individual marketplace than Democrats, and most enrollees live in Republican districts.
Congressional Republicans should come to the table to protect their constituents’ health care.
Cheryl Burt and I worked to secure funding for Minnesotans and people across the country to install new carbon monoxide detectors.
No family should suffer the loss of a child like Cheryl did, and this is an important first step in preventing deaths by carbon monoxide poisoning.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
A retiree from Jackson, who is too young for Medicare, told me he found out that without the healthcare.gov tax credits, his payments are going up $1500 a month! From $440 to $1,900.
Share your story: www.slotkin.senate.gov/letters/
It's unacceptable that firefighters who die or are permanently disabled from work-related cancers don't receive the same benefits as others in the line of duty.
I'm working across the aisle to pass my bill to honor our commitment to these first responders and their families.
Reposted bySenator Amy Klobuchar
I visited a community health center in Oak Harbor today, hearing directly from doctors about the need to extend the ACA tax credits.
Patients can't afford premiums that more than double—neither can providers.
It's past time to reopen government and SAVE the ACA tax credits!
President Trump is meeting with the President of Argentina instead of meeting with Congressional leaders to end the shutdown and prevent health care premiums from skyrocketing.
$20 billion for Argentina, but no $ for Americans' health care?
The expiration of health tax credits is raising premiums for cancer patients. 86% say it will make it harder for them to access critical care. That’s wrong. Republicans in Congress should not make it harder for people battling for their lives.
tcf.org/content/comm...
My bipartisan bill with Senator Grassley to bring home the 19,000 Ukrainian children kidnapped by Russia passed the Senate. We must do everything possible to bring these children home and reunite them with their families.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History774 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
774 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (42-53) |
| 2025-08-01 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (44-51) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-43) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-08-01 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-41) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-39) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-45) |
| 2025-07-31 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-41) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (59-38) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 34 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (24-73) |
| 2025-07-30 | S.J. Res. 41 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (27-70) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-07-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-49) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-44) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-47) |
| 2025-07-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-47) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-45) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-39) |
| 2025-07-28 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-45) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-48) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-07-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-46) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | H.R. 3944 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (90-8) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-47) |
| 2025-07-23 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-41) |
| 2025-07-22 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.