Amy Klobuchar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
May 25, 1960
Age 66
Phone
(202) 224-3244
Office
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Amy Klobuchar

Amy Jean Klobuchar is an American politician and lawyer serving as the senior United States senator from Minnesota, a seat she has held since 2007. A member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), Minnesota's affiliate of the Democratic Party, she previously served as the county attorney of Hennepin County, Minnesota.

Source: WikipediaView full (CC BY-SA)
Voting Record — 828
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Amy Klobuchar headshot
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 89 sponsored · 424 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Every American deserves access to quality healthcare. I won’t stop fighting until families no longer have to decide between paying for medical care or paying their utility bill, or between paying for prescription drugs or groceries.
I want to welcome the new Chief of the Capitol Police Michael G. Sullivan. At a time when members of Congress are facing increasing threats, he will play a crucial role in protecting democracy and everyone that works in and visits the Capitol.
Republicans in the Senate had the chance to amend the budget to: -Bring down the cost of prescriptions -Preserve SNAP -Stop massive cost shifts to the states -Protect Medicaid Instead they passed a bill that will spike our debt, take away health care, and leave families hungry.
Republicans in the Senate passed a bill that will increase our debt, take away healthcare, and raise grocery prices — all to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy. This is a betrayal of the American people.
Thanks to Medicaid, Dan’s daughter Claire is able to get the at-home care she requires without their family worrying about hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. This is who the Big Beautiful Betrayal will hurt the most.
Elena’s daughter Xiomara spent the first few months of her life in the NICU. Thanks to Medicaid, they were able to bring her home and pay for home health aides and the support she needs to thrive. This is who Congressional Republicans are rushing to take health care from.
I will be forcing vote to strike Republican proposal to help Alaska by delaying major SNAP cuts only for states with HIGH error rates (AK, DC, FL, GA, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, OR). If they keep it high for another year, they get another yr of delay. Insanity reigns. Rewarding errors.
I joined my @democrats.senate.gov colleagues and Americans who will be hurt by the Big Beautiful Betrayal on the Capitol steps to share their stories. This bill: - Cuts nearly $1T from Medicaid - Triggers $500B in Medicare cuts - Takes SNAP away from millions - Shifts billions in costs to states
WATCH: @warren.senate.gov on the Capitol steps explaining how Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause 300 rural hospitals to close. That would be devastating for everyone in those communities—not just those on Medicaid.
@schumer.senate.gov is leading Senate Democrats in fighting against the Big Beautiful Betrayal. We are forcing votes on amendments that will show whether Republicans will stand up for hungry children and rural hospitals, or betray them.
Jacky Rosen is on the Capitol steps with people hurt by this bill. As she said, our voice is our power. We will not be silent as Congressional Republicans try to rip away health care from kids with rare diseases who need Medicaid to survive.
As @SenatorHassan said on the steps of the Capitol: the Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause rural hospitals to close and make it more difficult to access pediatric specialists — leaving kids and families without the care they need.
@baldwin.senate.gov on the Capitol steps with people who will be hurt by this bill. She is right: the Big Beautiful Betrayal would be devastating for the health of children. 1 in 3 kids count on Medicaid for their care.
“I represent 67,000 pediatricians across the country. … Let's be perfectly clear, this bill will cause devastating impacts to children. And while children only represent 22% of our population, they represent 100% of the future”. - @AmerAcadPeds President Dr. Susan Kressly
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey on Republican cuts to SNAP: “This is about feeding people. This is about making sure that they have enough food so that they don't go hungry, so that they don't get sick or sicker … so that they don't die.”
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
828 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (21-75)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (15-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentNONOAmendment Rejected (14-81)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (45-50)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (42-53)
2025-08-01H.R. 3944 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (44-51)
2025-08-01Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Points of Order Re: Merkley Amdt. No. 3114)YESYESMotion Rejected (44-51, 3/5 majority required)
2025-08-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-43)
2025-08-01Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-08-01End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (55-41)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-44)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (59-39)
2025-07-31Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2025-07-31End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-41)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (59-38)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 34 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 34YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (24-73)
2025-07-30S.J. Res. 41 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 41YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (27-70)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-44)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-44)
2025-07-30Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (53-45)
2025-07-30End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (54-44)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (53-45)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-29End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-47)
2025-07-29Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-47)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2025-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-39)
2025-07-28End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-45)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-48)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2025-07-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-46)
2025-07-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-46)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (48-47)
2025-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-47)
2025-07-23End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-47)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

← PrevPage 8 / 17Next →