Republicans in the Senate had the chance to amend the budget to:
-Bring down the cost of prescriptions
-Preserve SNAP
-Stop massive cost shifts to the states
-Protect Medicaid
Instead they passed a bill that will spike our debt, take away health care, and leave families hungry.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 91 sponsored · 441 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
News 🚨The Wisconsin Supreme Court just affirmed that women should be able to make their own healthcare decisions.
Women should not be at the mercy of a patchwork of laws when it comes to reproductive health.
x.com/jbendery/sta...
Republicans in the Senate passed a bill that will increase our debt, take away healthcare, and raise grocery prices — all to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy.
This is a betrayal of the American people.
Thanks to Medicaid, Dan’s daughter Claire is able to get the at-home care she requires without their family worrying about hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills.
This is who the Big Beautiful Betrayal will hurt the most.
Elena’s daughter Xiomara spent the first few months of her life in the NICU. Thanks to Medicaid, they were able to bring her home and pay for home health aides and the support she needs to thrive.
This is who Congressional Republicans are rushing to take health care from.
I will be forcing vote to strike Republican proposal to help Alaska by delaying major SNAP cuts only for states with HIGH error rates (AK, DC, FL, GA, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, OR). If they keep it high for another year, they get another yr of delay. Insanity reigns. Rewarding errors.
I joined my @democrats.senate.gov colleagues and Americans who will be hurt by the Big Beautiful Betrayal on the Capitol steps to share their stories.
This bill:
- Cuts nearly $1T from Medicaid
- Triggers $500B in Medicare cuts
- Takes SNAP away from millions
- Shifts billions in costs to states
WATCH: @warren.senate.gov on the Capitol steps explaining how Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause 300 rural hospitals to close.
That would be devastating for everyone in those communities—not just those on Medicaid.
@reed.senate.gov and @democrats.senate.gov are speaking truth to power and standing up for our constituents. We need more Republicans to do the same.
@schumer.senate.gov is leading Senate Democrats in fighting against the Big Beautiful Betrayal.
We are forcing votes on amendments that will show whether Republicans will stand up for hungry children and rural hospitals, or betray them.
Jacky Rosen is on the Capitol steps with people hurt by this bill. As she said, our voice is our power. We will not be silent as Congressional Republicans try to rip away health care from kids with rare diseases who need Medicaid to survive.
As @SenatorHassan said on the steps of the Capitol: the Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause rural hospitals to close and make it more difficult to access pediatric specialists — leaving kids and families without the care they need.
@baldwin.senate.gov on the Capitol steps with people who will be hurt by this bill. She is right: the Big Beautiful Betrayal would be devastating for the health of children.
1 in 3 kids count on Medicaid for their care.
As @ronwyden.bsky.social said on the Capitol steps: This is not over. We can win this.”
We are fighting right now to Save Medicaid.
As former math teacher and current Delaware Governor @MattMeyerDE said: ‘the math ain't mathin’. This bill will take food away from families, all to give tax breaks to the wealthy.
“I represent 67,000 pediatricians across the country. … Let's be perfectly clear, this bill will cause devastating impacts to children. And while children only represent 22% of our population, they represent 100% of the future”. - @AmerAcadPeds President Dr. Susan Kressly
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey on Republican cuts to SNAP: “This is about feeding people. This is about making sure that they have enough food so that they don't go hungry, so that they don't get sick or sicker … so that they don't die.”
This is the moment for four Republicans to stand up and listen to their constituents and put a stop to this bill that will drive up costs for the American people.
I spoke on the Senate Floor about why Republicans’ rushed bill is a Big Beautiful Betrayal of the hardworking people of this country.
16 million people lose their health care, $4 TRILLION in debt, and higher interest rates that will make it harder for young people to buy a home.
Today we lay two incredible Minnesotans to rest. While I met with the Hortman family yesterday, votes today and the gravity of the budget bill do not allow me to attend the funeral. John and I will be watching on live stream.
My statement:
www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index...
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.