Amy Klobuchar headshot
At a Glance
Seat
U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Born
May 25, 1960
Age 66
Phone
(202) 224-3244
Office
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510, Washington 20510
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota

Amy Klobuchar

Voting Record — 890
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting2%
Party align94%
Cross-party5%
SoupScore
District Map

Senate District (Statewide)

U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Amy Klobuchar headshot
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 95 sponsored · 461 cosponsored
View profile

Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.

Republicans in the Senate had the chance to amend the budget to: -Bring down the cost of prescriptions -Preserve SNAP -Stop massive cost shifts to the states -Protect Medicaid Instead they passed a bill that will spike our debt, take away health care, and leave families hungry.
Republicans in the Senate passed a bill that will increase our debt, take away healthcare, and raise grocery prices — all to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy. This is a betrayal of the American people.
Thanks to Medicaid, Dan’s daughter Claire is able to get the at-home care she requires without their family worrying about hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills. This is who the Big Beautiful Betrayal will hurt the most.
Elena’s daughter Xiomara spent the first few months of her life in the NICU. Thanks to Medicaid, they were able to bring her home and pay for home health aides and the support she needs to thrive. This is who Congressional Republicans are rushing to take health care from.
I will be forcing vote to strike Republican proposal to help Alaska by delaying major SNAP cuts only for states with HIGH error rates (AK, DC, FL, GA, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, OR). If they keep it high for another year, they get another yr of delay. Insanity reigns. Rewarding errors.
I joined my @democrats.senate.gov colleagues and Americans who will be hurt by the Big Beautiful Betrayal on the Capitol steps to share their stories. This bill: - Cuts nearly $1T from Medicaid - Triggers $500B in Medicare cuts - Takes SNAP away from millions - Shifts billions in costs to states
WATCH: @warren.senate.gov on the Capitol steps explaining how Republicans’ Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause 300 rural hospitals to close. That would be devastating for everyone in those communities—not just those on Medicaid.
@schumer.senate.gov is leading Senate Democrats in fighting against the Big Beautiful Betrayal. We are forcing votes on amendments that will show whether Republicans will stand up for hungry children and rural hospitals, or betray them.
Jacky Rosen is on the Capitol steps with people hurt by this bill. As she said, our voice is our power. We will not be silent as Congressional Republicans try to rip away health care from kids with rare diseases who need Medicaid to survive.
As @SenatorHassan said on the steps of the Capitol: the Big Beautiful Betrayal will cause rural hospitals to close and make it more difficult to access pediatric specialists — leaving kids and families without the care they need.
@baldwin.senate.gov on the Capitol steps with people who will be hurt by this bill. She is right: the Big Beautiful Betrayal would be devastating for the health of children. 1 in 3 kids count on Medicaid for their care.
“I represent 67,000 pediatricians across the country. … Let's be perfectly clear, this bill will cause devastating impacts to children. And while children only represent 22% of our population, they represent 100% of the future”. - @AmerAcadPeds President Dr. Susan Kressly
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey on Republican cuts to SNAP: “This is about feeding people. This is about making sure that they have enough food so that they don't go hungry, so that they don't get sick or sicker … so that they don't die.”
I spoke on the Senate Floor about why Republicans’ rushed bill is a Big Beautiful Betrayal of the hardworking people of this country. 16 million people lose their health care, $4 TRILLION in debt, and higher interest rates that will make it harder for young people to buy a home.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History
890 total votes
ExpandCollapse

Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.

DateBillQuestionPositionParty MajAlign?Result
2026-08-08S. 5271 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-49)
2026-08-08End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-49)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (90-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-08H.R. 6500 (119th)Kill the motionYESYESMotion to Table Agreed to (61-32)
2026-08-07H.R. 6500 (119th)End debateYESYESCloture Motion Agreed to (91-6, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07S. Res. 817 (119th)Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Final passageYESYESBill Passed (86-11, 3/5 majority required)
2026-08-07H.R. 5334 (119th)Vote on amendmentYESYESAmendment Rejected (32-64)
2026-08-05S.J. Res. 187 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (48-50)
2026-08-05S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-08-05Confirm nomineeNOT_VOTINGNONomination Confirmed (51-44)
2026-08-05End debateNOT_VOTINGNOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-08-03H.R. 6500 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (89-4, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-30S. Res. 817 (119th)Approve resolutionNONOResolution Agreed to (50-47)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 181 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 181YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (49-50)
2026-07-30S.J. Res. 199 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-52)
2026-07-29S. Res. 817 (119th)End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-45)
2026-07-29H.R. 5334 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Agreed to (84-12)
2026-07-28H.R. 5334 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateYESYESCloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (86-12, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-28Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-47)
2026-07-27End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-43)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-44)
2026-07-23Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (48-47)
2026-07-23S.J. Res. 180 (119th)Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 180YESYESMotion to Discharge Rejected (47-49)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (54-44)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (62-36)
2026-07-22End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (60-35)
2026-07-22Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (49-46)
2026-07-21Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-48)
2026-07-20End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (43-40)
2026-07-16S.J. Res. 198 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (46-50)
2026-07-16End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (49-48)
2026-07-15Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (51-46)
2026-07-15End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (51-46)
2026-07-14S. 4784 (119th)End filibuster to begin debateNONOCloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (50-46, 3/5 majority required)
2026-07-14Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-45)
2026-07-13Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (46-44)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 185 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (47-50)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24S.J. Res. 196 (119th)Begin considerationYESYESMotion to Proceed Rejected (45-52)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (50-44)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (50-44)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-24Confirm nomineeNONONomination Confirmed (52-45)
2026-06-24End debateNONOCloture Motion Agreed to (52-45)
2026-06-23H. Con. Res. 86 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESConcurrent Resolution Agreed to (50-48)
2026-06-23Confirm nomineeYESNONomination Confirmed (67-30)
2026-06-22H.R. 6644 (119th)Accept House changesYESYESMotion Agreed to (85-5)

Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.

Page 1 / 18Next →