Social Security is a lifeline for 73 million Americans, and shuttering offices and eliminating staff means more Americans will struggle to access their Social Security.
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|Minnesota
Amy Klobuchar
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 851
Yes35%
No64%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party6%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Amy Klobuchar
U.S. SenatorDemocratMinnesota
SoupScore
Amy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 91 sponsored · 441 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
I joined thousands of people gathered at the Minnesota State Capitol to stand united against the Trump-Musk attacks on our democracy. The energy was off the charts!
We were on the Senate floor taking on the billionaire budget bill until 3 AM. Got one hour of sleep and came back on a 6 AM flight to this incredible “Hands Off” rally in St. Paul. Cannot believe the crowd!
It was great to stop by FIRST’s Robotics Regional Competition at the University of Minnesota today to meet with students and their families! Their innovation is a reminder of how important it is to invest in STEM education to shape the next generation of engineers & inventors.
Last night, Senate Republicans voted to allow tax cuts for people making over $100 million per year.
❌And $500 million per year.
❌And $1 billion per year.
❌Then they voted against tax cuts for big corporations.
You just can’t make this stuff up.
Tonight, Senate Republicans are voting for a budget resolution that will give more tax cuts to the wealthy and make families pay for it by raising costs and taking away health care.
With their budget, billionaires win and families lose. Senate Democrats are fighting back.
President Trump’s tariff tax is creating economic chaos.
He’s alienating our allies and raising costs while he and Elon Musk dismantle Social Security and cut Medicaid.
He should focus on helping families who are struggling to get by, not creating an economic disaster.
I just spoke on the Senate floor to oppose a budget that gives tax cuts for billionaires while allowing President Trump and Elon Musk to continue to gut the VA.
More than 9 million veterans rely on the VA for care, including 106,000 in Minnesota — we must take care of them.
I urge my Republican colleagues to oppose this disastrous budget and instead focus on reversing President Trump's tariff tax, which will cost the average family nearly $4,000 a year.
Republicans are trying to pass a budget that gives massive tax cuts to the ultra-wealthy, and pays for it by raising costs, taking away health care and threatening the economic security of tens of millions of Americans.
I spoke on the Senate Floor to strongly oppose it. Watch:
The Administration’s tariffs will hurt farmers, consumers, and our entire economy. The chaos needs to end. Hear more from my conversation with Sen. Peter Welch:
I just spoke on the Senate floor to oppose my Republican colleagues’ budget that threatens the health care of 31 million children and 7 million seniors to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
This is not what Americans want — I'll keep fighting to protect Americans’ health care.
Headed to the Senate floor to take on this Republican budget that helps the billionaires on the backs of everyone else. Talking about Medicaid and protecting your health care tonight with more to come. And check out what they did to your savings today.
It was great to meet with Andy Ferguson of Ferguson’s Orchards while he was in DC. He has farms in Jordan & Lake City that supplied apples that were enjoyed as part of the dessert at the inaugural luncheon. 🍎
Dismantling USAID’s global health programs puts Americans’ health at risk.
Thank you to @shaheen.senate.gov for hosting an important roundtable to discuss the need to protect Americans by supporting global health efforts.
Our courts have been holding Donald Trump accountable when he violates the law. Now Ted Cruz wants to strip the courts of their power.
My response?
We have three branches of government — not a king.
Republicans have made it official: They want to give more than $2 trillion in tax breaks to billionaires, and pay for it by taking health care and food away from Americans.
That’s wrong — and Democrats are working to stop them.
www.axios.com/2025/04/02/s...
The Trump Administration fired the federal workers who help people pay utility bills like heat, especially in cold weather states.
We should be focused on lowering costs for Americans, not making it harder for them to keep their heating on.
NEWS: The Senate just passed my bipartisan bill with @kaine.senate.gov & @markwarner.bsky.social which will block President Trump from abusing his powers to put a sales tax on Canadian goods.
We must restore stability to trade with Canada & reject higher prices brought by chaotic trade policies.
I just spoke on the Senate floor in support of my bipartisan resolution with @kaine.senate.gov and @markwarner.bsky.social to stop Trump’s sales tax on Canadian goods.
The President can’t abuse his power to wage an unjustified trade war that will drive up prices and put jobs on the line.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History851 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
851 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-12 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) |
| 2025-02-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Kill the motion | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Table Agreed to (52-47) |
| 2025-02-06 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-47) |
| 2025-02-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (55-44) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NOT_VOTING | NO | — | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.