The U.S. has long sought to ensure that such agreement with the Kingdom includes clear benefits for Americans and safeguards against abuses that could enable a nuclear weapons program.
What I’ve seen so far raises questions about whether these conditions have been met. 3/8
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 885
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 42 sponsored · 280 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This agreement is a serious piece of business that has major national security implications, but this administration is not treating it as such. 2/8
I love connecting with New Jerseyans at the Capitol and yesterday's Rutgers summer reception for students, internship supervisors, and alumni was no exception!
It's always a joy to hear how NJ students are spending their summers and what they're setting out to achieve.
Owning a home is out of reach, the average age of a first time homebuyer is 40.
I'm proud the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is now law – to help lower costs and put the American Dream of homeownership back within reach.
We can't just say what we're against. We have to say what we're for.
That's why I introduced MediKids – it's my vision for the future of this country.
This is a jarring visual every American should see.
Trump has made $2.24 BILLION as President.
Trump gets richer while you pay more for everything. Corruption like we've never seen.
This bill is a joke. It’s full of loopholes that let politicians continue to get rich off their positions.
Want to clean up corruption? My bill bans stock trading across all three branches and goes even further.
We don’t have to settle for performance. We can see through it and we can do better.
Every child deserves to get the care they need. That's what MediKids is all about.
I spoke with @katiecouric.bsky.social about the urgent need for this legislation to help millions of American children and families.
Our team is coming to Chatham, NJ! Have questions, concerns, or need help with a federal agency? We are here to help!
Join us for Mobile Office Hours alongside @repanalilia.bsky.social and the Borough of Chatham.
🗓️: Saturday, July 25, 2026
⏰: 10am - 2pm
📍: Chatham Borough Farmers Market
Did you know?... Nearly 4.5 million children do not have healthcare coverage.
That's why we need MediKids – guaranteed healthcare for every kid in America.
I introduced MediKids: legislation that would guarantee healthcare coverage for every American kid.
Here's why.
I want to guarantee healthcare coverage for every child in America. MediKids does that.
New Jersey, all 21 counties are under a Tornado Watch until 9pm, with certain counties already under a Tornado Warning. Expect flash flooding and severe thunderstorms.
Stay safe, stay indoors, and follow local guidance for up-to-date information.
Today, I’m introducing MediKids – guaranteed healthcare for every child no matter where they live or how much their parents make.
The concept is simple: Every kid deserves to be happy and healthy. Let's invest in our kids and build a stronger, healthier future.
I recently visited the U.S. Coast Guard Training Center in Cape May, NJ to meet with recruits and see the upgrades they are making to their facilities.
I’m proud that all Coast Guard recruits come through New Jersey and I’m thankful for their service to our country.
It's always a joy to sit down with the latest class of interns in my D.C. office as they present policy solutions for issues they care about.
From long-term care shortages to homelessness, I walked away inspired by their ideas to address these issues. Thank you for all your hard work this summer!
It was great to visit and learn about how the community came together to restore the building and open the museum for all to experience. 2/2
Cape May was home to Harriet Tubman during the early 1850s as she worked to fund Underground Railroad rescue missions.
I’m proud to have secured $1 million in federal funding to help the Harriet Tubman Museum digitize historical archives and share NJ’s abolitionist history. 1/2
Small businesses are essential to our shore communities. Today, I visited downtown Avalon to hear about how they are dealing with high costs and inflation.
It’s a wonderful time to visit the Jersey shore and support the local businesses that make our communities so special!
It was great to spend time in Cape May, a true Jersey gem!
Thanks to Cape May MAC for showing me around several historic landmarks, including the Emlen Physick Estate, and teaching the community about Cape May’s history and culture as part of the Jersey shore.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History885 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
885 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (48-52) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Wyden Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (49-51) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Motion (Schumer Motion to Commit H.R. 1 to the Committee on Finance with Instructions) | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair H.R. 1 | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-30 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Decision of the Chair S.Amdt. 2360 to H.R. 1 (No short title on file) | NO | NO | ✓ | Decision of Chair Sustained (53-47) |
| 2025-06-28 | H.R. 1 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-06-27 | S.J. Res. 59 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 59 | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (47-53) |
| 2025-06-26 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-25 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-40) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-06-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (61-35) |
| 2025-06-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (58-33) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-46) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-18 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (50-46) |
| 2025-06-17 | S. 1582 (119th) | Final passage | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Bill Passed (68-30) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-45) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-40) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-44) |
| 2025-06-17 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (46-39) |
| 2025-06-16 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (44-33) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-27, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Amendment Agreed to (67-30) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Motion (Motion to Waive All Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2307) | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Motion Agreed to (64-33, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-12 | S. 1582 (119th) | Kill the motion | YES | YES | ✓ | Motion to Table Failed (45-52) |
| 2025-06-12 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-44) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 54 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 54 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S.J. Res. 53 (119th) | Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 53 | NO | YES | ✕↔ | Motion to Discharge Rejected (39-56) |
| 2025-06-11 | S. 1582 (119th) | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (68-30, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-06-11 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-46) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-43) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-44) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (48-45) |
| 2025-06-10 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (53-41) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (53-43) |
| 2025-06-09 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (51-41) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (49-40) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-43) |
| 2025-06-05 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (52-43) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (57-38) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (48-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (60-37) |
| 2025-06-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (72-26) |
| 2025-06-03 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (66-28) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.