This is a dangerous escalation, and this administration must come before Congress for public hearings and explain to the American people why they are risking pulling us into another forever war. 2/2
Congress Member Profile|U.S. Senator|Democrat|New Jersey
Andy Kim
Source: Wikipedia • View full (CC BY-SA)
SoupScoreanalysis-first civic rating · view full breakdown
Loading…
Voting Record — 834
Yes31%
No68%
Present0%
Not Voting1%
Party align94%
Cross-party4%
SoupScore
District Map
Senate District (Statewide)
U.S. Census Bureau boundary data.
Social & Web
External Resources
Andy Kim
U.S. SenatorDemocratNew Jersey
SoupScore
Andy's ATmosphere Activity
20 recent posts · 34 sponsored · 241 cosponsored
Recent ATmosphere posts, sponsorships, and cosponsorships.
This threatened military action directly contradicts what Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth told my Senate colleagues and I today about the mission and goals of their operations in the Caribbean. 1/2
This administration’s “explanations” of their boat strikes are irrational and dangerous.
The American people deserve real answers.
Americans don't want another "forever war." What I heard in the classified briefing on strikes on the Caribbean today was disturbing and something we should all be concerned about.
Costs are up, unemployment is rising, and wages are stuck. It's clear that people are hurting under this economy.
We need Trump and his admin to focus on bringing these costs and unemployment down, not growing wealth for their already rich friends.
Today, I joined NJOP and storm survivors to talk about how you deserve a FEMA and a government that helps you in your greatest time of need.
Disasters are bound to strike, from floods to hurricanes to wildfires, and we must be there to help communities recover.
The Trump administration must continue to enforce the Hong Kong Policy Act, Hong Kong Autonomy Act, and Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act, and President Trump needs to call for his release in his future engagements with President Xi. 4/4
The international community cannot allow Beijing to continue to stifle dissent without consequences. 3/4
That Beijing feels it can go after Lai – a prominent figure and UK citizen - with impunity only underscores the degree to which it believes it has won in the struggle for Hong Kong's future, reneging on promises made during negotiation of Hong Kong's return from British control. 2/4
The conviction of Jimmy Lai under the National Security Law confirms the worst fears that Hong Kongers expressed when they took to the streets in 2020 - that Beijing will use this law to silence and crush dissent. 1/4
I look forward to sitting down with her and talking through what we can work on to prioritize combating corruption and stand up to the lawlessness of the Trump Administration. I will also work to maintain the Attorney General’s power and independence, including over the State Police. 2/2
I’m encouraged by the nomination of Jennifer Davenport as the next NJ Attorney General.
She brings serious experience and a dedication to public service that is much needed. I appreciated her focus on keeping our kids safe while fighting for affordability for our families. 1/2
It was an honor to meet with members of the freshmen NJ Assembly class this morning! I look forward to working with them to deliver for New Jersey – lowering costs, improving public transit, and restoring trust in government. Let's get to work!
Sec. Rubio should speak up and send a clear signal to Beijing. We will stand with those who risk everything for human rights and basic freedoms. 3/3
The Trump Administration has shown it’s willing to cast aside our values for the sake of kicking people out of the country, even if they’re escaping cruel oppression. 2/3
Guan Heng risked his life to illuminate human rights abuses against Uyghurs, providing important evidence for the U.S. to counter Beijing's actions. It should earn him asylum, not deportation. 1/3
Corruption is corrosive. Whether at the state, local, or national level, it causes Americans to lose faith in our government.
That is why we must fight against corruption everywhere we find it and deliver a government that works for you, not against you.
Hanukkah teaches us that light overcomes the darkness. May each candle lit be a reminder of resilience and to stand with one another against hate.
Tonight, Jewish families from across our state and around the world will gather for the beginning of Hanukkah. They’ll do so following the horrific and tragic murders targeting the Jewish community in Sydney.
It's an honor to be a caregiver to our great nation. Let’s get to work.
SoupScore Breakdown
Loading analysis metrics…
Voting History834 total votesExpandCollapse
Voting History
834 total votes
Recent roll calls with party-majority context so it is easier to scan how this member tends to vote.
| Date | Bill | Question | Position | Party Maj | Align? | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (55-45) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (54-46) |
| 2025-02-04 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (77-23) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (52-46) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (59-38) |
| 2025-02-03 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (83-13) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (62-35) |
| 2025-01-30 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (80-17) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (78-20) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (56-42) |
| 2025-01-29 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (56-42) |
| 2025-01-28 | H.R. 23 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (54-45, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-28 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | YES | ✕ | Nomination Confirmed (77-22) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | End debate | YES | YES | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (97-0) |
| 2025-01-27 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (68-29) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (67-23) |
| 2025-01-25 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (59-34) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-39) |
| 2025-01-24 | — | Confirm nominee | NO | NO | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (51-49) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Nomination Confirmed (74-25) |
| 2025-01-23 | — | End debate | YES | NO | ✕↔ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (72-26) |
| 2025-01-22 | S. 6 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected (52-47, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (53-45) |
| 2025-01-21 | — | Begin consideration | NO | NO | ✓ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (54-46) |
| 2025-01-20 | — | Confirm nominee | YES | YES | ✓ | Nomination Confirmed (99-0) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Final passage | NO | NO | ✓ | Bill Passed (64-35) |
| 2025-01-20 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (75-24) |
| 2025-01-17 | S. 5 (119th) | End debate | NO | NO | ✓ | Cloture Motion Agreed to (61-35, 3/5 majority required) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | YES | YES | ✓ | Amendment Rejected (46-49) |
| 2025-01-15 | S. 5 (119th) | Vote on amendment | NO | NO | ✓ | Amendment Agreed to (70-25) |
| 2025-01-13 | S. 5 (119th) | Begin consideration | NO | YES | ✕ | Motion to Proceed Agreed to (82-10) |
| 2025-01-09 | S. 5 (119th) | End filibuster to begin debate | NO | YES | ✕ | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (84-9, 3/5 majority required) |
Alignment stats consider only votes where a clear yes/no majority existed for the legislator's party. Cross-party marks divergence where the vote matched the opposite party majority. ↔ indicates cross-party divergence.
← PrevPage 17 / 17